EDP Sciences logo
Submit your research paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 14 / No 1 (2018) J. Eur. Opt. Soc.-Rapid Publ., 14 1 (2018) 5 References
Open Access
Issue
J. Eur. Opt. Soc.-Rapid Publ.
Volume 14, Number 1, 2018
Article Number 5
Number of page(s) 8
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/s41476-018-0073-0
Published online 20 February 2018
  1. Hardy JW, Active optics: a new technology for the control of light. Proceedings of the IEEE (1978) 651–697. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fernandez E, Artal P, Membrane deformable mirror for adaptive optics: performance limits in visual optics. Opt. Express (2003) 11, 1056–1069. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.11.001056 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Booth, M.: Adaptive optics in microscopy. In: Optical and Digital Image Processing: Fundamentals and Applications, pp. 295–321. Wiley-VCH Verlag, Weinheim (2011) [Google Scholar]
  4. Yoo, H.W., Van Royen, M.E., Van Cappellen, W.A., Houtsmuller, A.B., Verhaegen, M., Schitter, G.: Automated spherical aberration correction in scanning confocal microscopy. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 85, 123706 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  5. Dong S, Haist T, Osten W, Hybrid wavefront sensor for the fast detection of wavefront disturbances. Appl. Opt. (2012) 51, 6268–6274. https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.51.006268 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Haber A, Polo A, Smith CS, Pereira SF, Urbach P, Verhaegen M, Iterative learning control of a membrane deformable mirror for optimal wavefront correction. Appl. Opt. (2013) 52, 2363–2373. https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.52.002363 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Xie Y, Zhang W, Tao D, Hu W, Qu Y, Wang H, Removing turbulence effect via hybrid total variation and deformation-guided kernel regression. IEEE Trans. Image Process. (2016) 25, 4943–4958. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2016.2598638 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kulcsár C, Raynaud H-F, Petit C, Conan J-M, Minimum variance prediction and control for adaptive optics. Automatica (2012) 48, 1939–1954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2012.03.030 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Koukourakis N, Fregin B, König J, Büttner L, Czarske JW, Wavefront shaping for imaging-based flow velocity measurements through distortions using a Fresnel guide star. Opt. Express (2016) 24, 1922074–22087. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.24.022074 [Google Scholar]
  10. Bourgenot, C., Saunter, C.D., Love, G.D., Girkin, J.M.: Comparison of closed loop and sensorless adaptive optics in widefield optical microscopy. J. Eur. Opt. Soc. 8, 13027 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  11. Booth M, Wavefront sensor-less adaptive optics: a model-based approach using sphere packings. Opt. Express (2006) 14, 1339–1352. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.14.001339 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Booth MJ, Wavefront sensorless adaptive optics for large aberrations. Opt. Lett. (2007) 32, 5–7. https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.32.000005 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Debarre D, Booth MJ, Wilson T, Image based adaptive optics through optimisation of low spatial frequencies. Opt. Express (2007) 15, 8176–8190. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.15.008176 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Burke D, Patton B, Huang F, Bewersdorf J, Booth MJ, Adaptive optics correction of specimen-induced aberrations in single-molecule switching microscopy. Optica (2015) 2, 177–185. https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.2.000177 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Warber M, Maier S, Haist T, Osten W, Combination of scene-based and stochastic measurement for wide-field aberration correction in microscopic imaging. Appl. Opt. (2010) 49, 5474–5479. https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.49.005474 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Antonello J, Verhaegen M, Fraanje R, van Werkhoven T, Gerritsen HC, Keller CU, Semidefinite programming for model-based sensorless adaptive optics. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A Opt. Image Sci. Vis. (2012) 29, 2428–2438. https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.29.002428 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Thielicke W, Stamhuis EJ, PIVlab - towards user-friendly, affordable and accurate digital particle image velocimetry in MATLAB. J. Open Res. Softw. (2014) 2, e30. https://doi.org/10.5334/jors.bl [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Murray LP, Smart Optics: Wavefront Sensor-less Adaptive Optics-Image Correction through Sharpness Maximisation (2006) [Google Scholar]
  19. Facomprez A, Beaurepaire E, Débarre D, Accuracy of correction in modal sensorless adaptive optics. Opt. Express (2012) 20, 2598. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.20.002598 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Doble, N.: Image Sharpness Metrics and Search Strategies for Indirect Adaptive Optics, Durham Theses. Durham University, Durham (2000) [Google Scholar]
  21. Muller RA, Buffington A, Through image sharpening. J. Opt. Soc. Am. (1974) 64, 1200–1210. https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSA.64.001200 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Fienup JR, Miller JJ, Aberration correction by maximizing generalized sharpness metrics. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A Opt. Image Sci. Vis. (2003) 20, 609–620. https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.20.000609 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lagarias JC, Reeds JA, Wright MH, Wright PE, Convergence properties of the Nelder--Mead simplex method in low dimensions. SIAM J. Optim. (1998) 9, 112–147. https://doi.org/10.1137/S1052623496303470 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Noll RJ, Zernike polynomials and atmospheric turbulence. J. Opt. Soc. Am. (1976) 66, 207. https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSA.66.000207 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Mendelsohn, M.L., Hungerford, D.A., Mayall, B.H., Perrv, B., Conway, T., Prewitt, J.M.S.: Computer-oriented analysis of human chromosomes. II. integrated optical density as a single parameter for karyotype analysis. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 376–392 (1969) [Google Scholar]
  26. Ferzli R, Karam LJ, A no reference objective sharpness metric using riemannian tensor. IEEE 3rd International Workshop on Video Processing and Quality Metrics for Consumer Electronics (2007) [Google Scholar]
  27. Büttner L, Leithold C, Czarske J, Interferometric velocity measurements through a fluctuating gas-liquid interface employing adaptive optics. Opt. Express (2013) 21, 30653–30663. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.21.030653 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Radner H, Büttner L, Czarske J, Interferometric velocity measurements through a fluctuating phase boundary using two Fresnel guide stars. Opt. Lett. (2015) 40, 3766–3769. https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.40.003766 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.