EDP Sciences logo
Submit your research paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 14 / No 1 (2018) J. Eur. Opt. Soc.-Rapid Publ., 14 1 (2018) 4 References
Open Access
Issue
J. Eur. Opt. Soc.-Rapid Publ.
Volume 14, Number 1, 2018
Article Number 4
Number of page(s) 13
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/s41476-018-0075-y
Published online 15 February 2018
  1. Spaeth ML, Manes KR, Widmayer CC, Williams W, Whitman PA, Henesian M, The National Ignition Facility Wavefront Requirements and optical architecture. Proc. SPIE (2004) 5341, 25–42. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.538478 [Google Scholar]
  2. Yu G, Li H, Walker DD, Removal of mid spatial-frequency features in mirror segments. J. Eur. Opt. Soc. (2011) 6, 11044. https://doi.org/10.2971/jeos.2011.11044 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Glatzel H, Ashworth D, Bremer M, Chin R, Cummings K, Girard L, Goldstein M, Gullikson E, Hudyma R, Kennon J, Kestner B, Marchetti L, Naulleau P, Soufli R, Spiller E, Projection optics for extreme ultraviolet lithography (EUVL) micro-field exposure tools (METs) with a numerical aperture of 0.5. Proc of. SPIE (2013) 8679, 867917. [Google Scholar]
  4. Shafrir SN, Lambropoulos JC, Jacobs SD, A magnetorheological polishing-based approach for studying precision microground surfaces of tungsten carbides. Precis. Eng. (2007) 31, 283–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2006.03.002 [Google Scholar]
  5. Arnold T, Pietag F, Ion beam figuring machine for ultra-precision silicon spheres correction. Precis. Eng. (2015) 41, 119–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2015.03.009 [Google Scholar]
  6. Arnold T, Boehm G, Paetzelt H, New freeform manufacturing chain based on atmospheric plasma jet machining. J. Eur. Opt. Soc. (2016) 11, 16002. https://doi.org/10.2971/jeos.2016.16002 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Walker DD, Brooks D, King A, Freeman R, Morton R, McCavana G, Kim S, The ‘precessions’ tooling for polishing and figuring flat, spherical and aspheric surfaces. Opt. Express (2003) 11, 8958–964. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.11.000958 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Li HY, Yu GY, Walker DD, Evans R, Modelling and measurement of polishing tool influence. J. Eur. Opt. Soc. (2011) 6, 11048. https://doi.org/10.2971/jeos.2011.11048 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Walker DD, Yu G, Bibby M, Dunn C, Li H, Wu HY, Zheng X, Zhang P, Robotic automation in computer controlled polishing. J. Eur. Opt. Soc. (2016) 11, 16005. https://doi.org/10.2971/jeos.2016.16005 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Feit MD, Rubenchik AM, Influence of subsurface cracks on laser induced surface damage. Proc. SPIE (2004) 5273, 264–272. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.523864 [Google Scholar]
  11. Lawson JK, Wolfe CR, Manes KR, Trenholme JB, Aikens DM, English RE, Specification of optical components using the power spectral density function. Proc of. SPIE (1995) 2536, 38–50. [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  12. Pohl M, Börret R, Simulation of mid-spatials from the grinding process. J. Eur. Opt. Soc. (2016) 11, 16010. [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  13. Wang CJ, Yang W, Ye S, Wang ZZ, Zhong B, Guo YB, Xu Q, Optimization of parameters for bonnet polishing based on the minimum residual error method. Opt. Eng. (2014) 53, 7075108. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.OE.53.7.075108 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Wang C, Yang W, Ye S, Wang ZZ, Yang P, Peng Y, Guo Y, Xu Q, Restraint of tool path ripple based on the optimization of tool step size for sub-aperture deterministic polishing. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. (2014) 75, 1431–1438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6223-7 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Wang CJ, Wang Z, Xu Q, Unicursal random maze tool path for computer-controlled optical surfacing. Appl. Opt. (2015) 54, 3410128–10136. https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.54.010128 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Wang T, Cheng HB, Yang H, Wu WT, Tam HY, Controlling mid-spatial frequency errors in magnetorheological jet polishing with a simple vertical model. Appl. Opt. (2015) 54, 216433–6440. https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.54.006433 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Tam HY, Cheng HB, Dong ZC, Peano-like paths for subaperture polishing of optical aspherical surfaces. International journal of advanced manufacturing technology. Appl. Opt. (2015) 52, 153624–3636. https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.52.003624 [Google Scholar]
  18. Tam HY, Cheng HB, An investigation of the effects of the tool path on the removal of material in polishing. J. Mater. Process. Technol. (2010) 210, 807–818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.01.012 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Khakpour H, Birglen L, Tahan S, Uniform scanning path generation for abrasive waterjet polishing of free-form surfaces modeled by triangulated meshes. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. (2015) 77, 1167–1176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6504-1 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Dunn CR, Walker DD, Pseudo-random tool paths for CNC sub-aperture polishing and other applications. Opt. Express (2008) 16, 2318942–18949. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.16.018942 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hu H, Dai YF, Peng XQ, Restraint of tool path ripple based on surface error distribution and process parameters in deterministic finishing. Opt. Express (2010) 18, 2222973–22981. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.18.022973 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Dai YF, Shi F, Peng XQ, Li SY, Restraint of mid-spatial frequency error in magneto-rheological finishing (MRF) process by maximum entropy method. Sci. China Ser. E: Technol. Sci. (2009) 52, 103092–3097. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-009-0316-9 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.