EDP Sciences logo
Submit your research paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 22 / No 1 (2026) J. Eur. Opt. Society-Rapid Publ., 22 1 (2026) 20 References
Open Access
Issue
J. Eur. Opt. Society-Rapid Publ.
Volume 22, Number 1, 2026
Article Number 20
Number of page(s) 12
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/jeos/2026018
Published online 03 April 2026
  1. Harper ES, Coyle EJ, Vernon JP, Mills MS, Inverse design of broadband highly reflective metasurfaces using neural networks, Phys. Rev. B. 101, 195104 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.101.195104. [Google Scholar]
  2. Zhao J, Wu X, Cao D, Zhou M, Shen Z, Zhao X, Broadband omnidirectional visible spectral metamaterials, Photonics Res. 11, 1284–1293 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1364/PRJ.482542. [Google Scholar]
  3. Pendry JB, A chiral route to negative refraction, Science 306, 1353–1355 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1104467. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Li Z, Zhao R, Koschny T, Kafesaki M, Alici KB, Colak E, Soukoulis CM, Chiral metamaterials with negative refractive index based on four “U” split ring resonators, Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 081901 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3457448. [Google Scholar]
  5. Smith DR, Padilla WJ, Vier DC, Nemat-Nasser SC, Schultz S, Composite medium with simultaneously negative permeability and permittivity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4184–4187 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.4184. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Pendry JB, Schurig D, Smith DR, Controlling electromagnetic fields, Science 312, 1780–1782 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1125907. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Pendry JB, Negative refraction makes a perfect lens, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3966–3969 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.3966. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Shelby RA, Smith DR, Schultz S, Experimental verification of a negative index of refraction, Science 292, 77–79 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1058847. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Pallavi M, Kumar P, Ali T, Shenoy SB, Modeling of a negative refractive index metamaterial unit-cell and array for aircraft surveillance applications, IEEE Access 10, 99790–99812 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3206358. [Google Scholar]
  10. Aziz RS, Koziel S, Pietrenko-Dabrowska A, Millimeter wave negative refractive index metamaterial antenna array, Sci. Rep. 14, 16037 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-67234-z. [Google Scholar]
  11. Wang J, Allein F, Boechler N, Friend J, Vazquez-Mena O, Design and fabrication of negative-refractive-index metamaterial unit cells for near-megahertz enhanced acoustic transmission in biomedical ultrasound applications, Phys. Rev. Appl. 15, 024025 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.15.024025. [Google Scholar]
  12. Datta S, Mukherjee S, Shi X, Haq M, Deng Y, Udpa L, Rothwell E, Negative index metamaterial lens for subwavelength microwave detection, Sensors 21, 4782 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/s21144782. [Google Scholar]
  13. Padilla WJ, Basov DN, Smith DR, Negative refractive index metamaterials, Mater. Today 9, 28–35 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-7021(06)71573-5. [Google Scholar]
  14. Lee SH, Park CM, Seo YM, Kim CK, Reversed Doppler effect in double negative metamaterials, Phys. Rev. B 81, 241102 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.81.241102. [Google Scholar]
  15. Zhu R, Liu XN, Huang GL, Study of anomalous wave propagation and reflection in semi-infinite elastic metamaterials, Wave Motion 55, 73–83 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wavemoti.2014.12.007. [Google Scholar]
  16. Chen HT, Taylor AJ, Yu N, A review of metasurfaces: physics and applications, Rep. Prog. Phys. 79, 076401 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/79/7/076401. [Google Scholar]
  17. Kumar R, Kumar M, Chohan JS, Kumar S, Overview on metamaterial: history, types and applications, Mater. Today Proc. 56, 3016–3024 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.11.423. [Google Scholar]
  18. Capolino F, Applications of metamaterials, CRC Press, Boca Raton (2017). [Google Scholar]
  19. Veselago VG, The electrodynamics of substances with simultaneously negative values of ε and μ, Sov. Phys. Usp. 10, 509–514 (1968). https://doi.org/10.1070/PU1968v010n04ABEH003699. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Li J, Zeng Q, Liu R, Denidni TA, Beam-tilting antenna with negative refractive index metamaterial loading, IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 16, 2030–2033 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/LAWP.2017.2694400. [Google Scholar]
  21. Xu HX, Wang GM, Qi MQ, Lv YY, Gao X, Metamaterial lens made of fully printed resonant-type negative-refractive-index transmission lines, Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 193502 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4804602. [Google Scholar]
  22. Haxha S, AbdelMalek F, Ouerghi F, Charlton MDB, Aggoun A, Fang XJSR, Metamaterial superlenses operating at visible wavelength for imaging applications, Sci. Rep. 8, 16119 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-33572-y. [Google Scholar]
  23. Islam MM, Islam MT, Samsuzzaman M, Faruque MRI, Compact metamaterial antenna for UWB applications, Electron. Lett. 51, 1222–1224 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1049/el.2015.2131. [Google Scholar]
  24. Choudhury B, Jha RM, A review of metamaterial invisibility cloaks, Comput. Mater. Contin. 33, 275–303 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  25. Krzysztofik WJ, Cao TN: Metamaterials in application to improve antenna parameters, Metamaterials Metasurf. 12, 63–85 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  26. Antoniades MA, Zhu J, Selvanayagam M, Eleftheriades GV Compact, wideband and multiband antennas based on metamaterial concepts, in Proc. 4th Eur. Conf. Antennas Propag. (IEEE, 2010), pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  27. Saeidi T, Ismail I, Wen WP, Alhawari AR, Mohammadi A, Ultra-wideband antennas for wireless communication applications, Int. J. Antennas Propag. 2019, 7918765 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7918765. [Google Scholar]
  28. Mirbagheri G, Crouse D, Dunn K, Bendoym I, Metamaterials based hyperspectral and multi-wavelength filters for imaging applications, in Image Sensing Technologies VI, Proc. SPIE 10980, 29–35 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2522262. [Google Scholar]
  29. Padilla WJ, Averitt RD, Imaging with metamaterials, Nat. Rev. Phys. 4, 85–100 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-021-00394-3. [Google Scholar]
  30. Cerniauskas G, Sadia H, Alam P, Machine intelligence in metamaterials design: a review, Oxford Open Mater. Sci. 4, 1 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfmat/itae001. [Google Scholar]
  31. Sun S, Dong P, Zhang F, Wang J, Zhu N, Shi Y, Inverse design of ultra-compact multimode waveguide bends based on free-form curves, Laser Photon. Rev. 15, 2100162 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/lpor.202100162. [Google Scholar]
  32. Chen Y, Qiu J, Dong Z, Wang L, Liu Y, Guo H, et al., Inverse design of free-form devices with fabrication-friendly topologies based on structure transformation, J. Lightwave Technol. 41, 4762–4776 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2023.3242472. [Google Scholar]
  33. Tsuji Y, Hirayama K, Nomura T, Sato K, Nishiwaki S, Design of optical circuit devices based on topology optimization, IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 18, 850–852 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1109/LPT.2006.871686. [Google Scholar]
  34. Iguchi A, Tsuji Y, Yasui T, Hirayama K, Topology optimal design for optical waveguides using time domain beam propagation method, IEICE Electron. Express 15, 20180417 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1587/elex.15.20180417. [Google Scholar]
  35. Jakšić Z, Synergy between AI and optical metasurfaces: a critical overview of recent advances, Photonics 11, 442 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics11050442. [Google Scholar]
  36. Anjum N, Hasan R, Performance benchmarking of machine learning models for terahertz metamaterial absorber prediction, arXiv 2508.08611 (2025). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2508.08611. [Google Scholar]
  37. Mora A, Herrera-Ramos G, Ramirez-Gutierrez DL, Sanchez-Ante G, Batres R, Roman-Flores A, et al., Modeling and design of architected structures and metamaterials assisted with artificial intelligence, Mater. Res. Express 11, 122002 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ad9dbc. [Google Scholar]
  38. Lingala S, Singarapu S, Dual-mode THz metamaterial absorber: wideband EMI shielding and narrowband biosensing with machine learning integration, Phys. Scr. 100, 125512 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/ae2573. [Google Scholar]
  39. Han J, Choi J, Park HS, Layout optimization of the grid-shaped metamaterial-based resonators for frequency tuning, Dev. Built Environ. 100823 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dibe.2025.100823. [Google Scholar]
  40. Ma C, Wang Z, Zhang H, Yang F, Chen J, Ren Q, et al., Inverse design of electromagnetic metamaterials: from iterative to deep learning-based methods, J. Micromech. Microeng. 34, 053001 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6439/ad3a72. [Google Scholar]
  41. Frandsen LH, Elesin Y, Frellsen LF, Mitrovic M, Ding Y, Sigmund O, et al., Topology optimized mode conversion in a photonic crystal waveguide fabricated in silicon-on-insulator material, Opt. Express 22, 8525–8532 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.22.008525. [Google Scholar]
  42. Pita JL, Aldaya I, Dainese P, Hernandez-Figueroa HE, Gabrielli LH, Design of a compact CMOS-compatible photonic antenna by topological optimization, Opt. Express 26, 2435–2442 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.26.002435. [Google Scholar]
  43. Ji W, Chang J, Xu HX, Gao JR, Gröblacher S, Urbach HP, et al., Recent advances in metasurface design and quantum optics applications with machine learning, physics-informed neural networks, and topology optimization methods, Light Sci. Appl. 12, 169 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-023-01218-y. [Google Scholar]
  44. Jensen JS, Sigmund O, Topology optimization for nano-photonics, Laser Photon. Rev. 5, 308–321 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1002/lpor.201000014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. Backer AS, Computational inverse design for cascaded systems of metasurface optics, Opt. Express 22, 30308–30330 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.27.030308. [Google Scholar]
  46. Mansouree M, Arbabi A, Metasurface design using level-set and gradient descent optimization techniques, in: Proc. ACES-Miami 2019 (IEEE, 2019). [Google Scholar]
  47. Nanda S, Sahu PK, Mishra RK, Inverse artificial neural network modeling for metamaterial unit cell synthesis, J. Comput. Electron. 18, 1388–1399 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10825-019-01371-x. [Google Scholar]
  48. Chen Y, Zhu J, Xie Y, Feng N, Liu QH, Smart inverse design of graphene-based photonic metamaterials by an adaptive artificial neural network, Nanoscale 11, 9749–9755 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1039/C9NR01315F. [Google Scholar]
  49. Harper ES, Coyle EJ, Vernon JP, Mills MS, Inverse design of broadband highly reflective metasurfaces using neural networks, Phys. Rev. B 101, 195104 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.101.195104. [Google Scholar]
  50. Choudhury B, Thomas S, Jha RM, Implementation of soft computing optimization techniques in antenna engineering, IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag. 57, 122–131 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/MAP.2015.2439612. [Google Scholar]
  51. Bacigalupo A, Gnecco G, Lepidi M, Gambarotta L, Machine-learning techniques for the optimal design of acoustic metamaterials, J. Optim. Theory Appl. 187, 630–653 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10957-019-01614-8. [Google Scholar]
  52. Beale MH, Hagan MT, Demuth HB, Deep learning toolbox user’s guide (MathWorks, Natick, 2018). [Google Scholar]
  53. Johnson SG, Joannopoulos JD, Block-iterative frequency-domain methods for Maxwell’s equations in a planewave basis, Opt. Express 8, 173–190 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.8.000173. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  54. Oskooi AF, Roundy D, Ibanescu M, Bermel P, Joannopoulos JD, Johnson SG, MEEP: A flexible free-software package for electromagnetic simulations by the FDTD method, Comput. Phys. Commun. 181, 687–702 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2009.11.008. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  55. Alp İ, Öner BB, Eroğlu E, 285 nm AlGaN-based deep-ultraviolet LED with high internal quantum efficiency: computational design, J. Sci. Rep.-A 052, 51–64 (2023). https://doi.org/10.59313/jsr-a.1195106. [Google Scholar]
  56. Alp İ, Öner BB, Eroğlu E, Çiftci Y, Quantum efficiency improvement of InGaN near ultraviolet LED design by genetic algorithm, Sakarya Univ. J. Sci. 27, 94–112 (2023). https://doi.org/10.16984/saufenbilder.1051252. [Google Scholar]
  57. Taflove A, Hagness SC, Piket-May M, Computational electromagnetics: the finite-difference time-domain method, in The Electrical Engineering Handbook (2005), pp. 629–670. [Google Scholar]
  58. MATLAB, Version 7.10.0 (R2010a) (MathWorks, Natick, 2010). [Google Scholar]
  59. Wang Y, Pan Z, Yan Y, Yang Y, Zhao W, Ding N, et al., A review of gallium phosphide nanophotonics towards omnipotent nonlinear devices, Nanophotonics 13, 3207–3252 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2024-0172. [Google Scholar]
  60. Haynes WM, CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 93rd ed. (CRC Press, 2012). [Google Scholar]
  61. Vidal C, Tilmann B, Tiwari S, Raziman TV, Maier SA, Wenger J, et al., Fluorescence enhancement in topologically optimized gallium phosphide all-dielectric nanoantennas, Nano Lett. 24, 2437–2443 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.3c03773. [Google Scholar]
  62. Pozar DM, Microwave Engineering, 4th ed. (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, 2012), pp. 26–30. [Google Scholar]
  63. Piggott AY, Petykiewicz J, Su L, Vučković J, Fabrication-constrained nanophotonic inverse design, Sci. Rep. 7, 1786 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01939-2. [Google Scholar]
  64. Yamsiri A, Duffy DA, Machin G, Sweeney SJ, Active photonic thermometry using quantum well heterostructures and ring resonators, AIP Conf. Proc. 3230, 110004 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0234129. [Google Scholar]
  65. Komma J, Schwarz C, Hofmann G, Heinert D, Nawrodt R, Thermo-optic coefficient of silicon at 1550 nm and cryogenic temperatures, Appl. Phys. Lett. 101, 041905 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4738989. [Google Scholar]
  66. Nguyen HT, Bui TS, Yan S, Vandenbosch GAE, Lievens P, Vu LD, et al., Broadband negative refractive index obtained by plasmonic hybridization in metamaterials, Appl. Phys. Lett. 109, 221901 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4968802. [Google Scholar]
  67. Briukhanova D, Habib M, Issah I, Caglayan H, Low loss fishnet metamaterial via self-rolled nanotechnology, Appl. Phys. Lett. 119, 141101 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0063120. [Google Scholar]
  68. Islam SS, Faruque MRI, Islam MT, Ali MT, A new wideband negative refractive index metamaterial for dual-band operation, Appl. Phys. A 123, 252 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-016-0737-9. [Google Scholar]
  69. Ling F, Zhong Z, Huang R, Zhang B, A broadband tunable terahertz negative refractive index metamaterial, Sci. Rep. 8, 9843 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-28221-3. [Google Scholar]
  70. Suzuki T, Sekiya M, Sato T, Takebayashi Y, Negative refractive index metamaterial with high transmission, low reflection, and low loss in the terahertz waveband, Opt. Express 26, 8314–8324 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.26.008314. [Google Scholar]
  71. Rasad A, Yudistira HT, Qalbina F, Saputro AG, Faisal A, Multilayer flexible metamaterials based on circular shape with negative refractive index at microwave spectrum, Sens. Actuators A 332, 113208 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2021.113208. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.