EDP Sciences logo
Submit your research paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 22 / No 1 (2026) J. Eur. Opt. Society-Rapid Publ., 22 1 (2026) 21 References
Open Access
Issue
J. Eur. Opt. Society-Rapid Publ.
Volume 22, Number 1, 2026
Article Number 21
Number of page(s) 11
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/jeos/2026015
Published online 03 April 2026
  1. Hed, PP, Edwards, DF, Davis, JB, in Proceedings of the optical fabrication and testing, Santa Clara, 1988 (Optica Publishing Group, Washington, D.C., 1988), paper WC1. https://doi.org/10.1364/OFT.1988.WC1. [Google Scholar]
  2. Preston, FW, The structure of abraded glass surfaces, Trans. Opt. Soc. 23, 141 (1922). https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-4878/23/3/301. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Moses, EI, in Proceedings of the 20th IEEE/NPSS Symposium on Fusion Engineering, San Diego, 2003 (IEEE, 2003), p. 413. https://doi.org/10.1109/FUSION.2003.1426672. [Google Scholar]
  4. Campbell, JH, Hawley-Fedder, RA, Stolz, CJ, Menapace, JA, Borden, MR, Whitman, PK, et al., in Proceedings of the Lasers and Applications in Science and Engineering, San Jose, 2004, edited by Lane, MA. and Wuest, CR. (Proceedings Volume 5341, Optical Engineering at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory II: The National Ignition Facility, San Jose, 2004), p. 84. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.538471. [Google Scholar]
  5. Wang, H, Ma, Y, Peng, G, Hang, W, Jiang, W, Chen, H, et al., Evaluation of subsurface damage layer of BK7 glass via cross-sectional surface nanoindentation, Precis. Eng. 67, 293 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2020.10.008. [Google Scholar]
  6. Jiao, P, Xin, Q, Fan, B, Wu, Y, Wu, X, Morphology evolution of Vickers indentation in fused silica glass etched by atmospheric pressure plasma jet, Ceram. Int. 48, 31500 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.07.069. [Google Scholar]
  7. Hu, G, Zhao, Y, Liu, X, Li, D, Xiao, Q, Yi, K, Shao, J, Combining wet etching and real-time damage event imaging to reveal the most dangerous laser damage initiator in fused silica, Opt. Lett. 38, 2632 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.38.002632. [Google Scholar]
  8. Lambropoulos, JC, Li, Y, Funkenbusch, PD, Ruckman, JL, in Proceedings of the SPIE’s International Symposium on Optical Science, Engineering, and Instrumentation, Denver, CO, 1999 (SPIE, 1999), p. 41. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.369213. [Google Scholar]
  9. Fine, KR, Garbe, R, Gip, T, Nguyen, Q, in Proceedings of the Defense and Security, Orlando, 2005 (SPIE, 2005), p. 105. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.602993. [Google Scholar]
  10. Liu, H, Ye, X, Zhou, X, Huang, J, Wang, F, Zhou, X, et al., Subsurface defects characterization and laser damage performance of fused silica optics during HF-etched process, Opt. Mate. 36, 855 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2013.11.022. [Google Scholar]
  11. Lakhdari, F, Belkhir, N, Bouzid, D, Herold, V, Relationship between subsurface damage depth and breaking strength for brittle materials, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 102, 1421 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-03284-8. [Google Scholar]
  12. Zhou, Y, Funkenbusch, PD, Quesnel, DJ, Golini, D, Lindquist, A, Effect of Etching and Imaging Mode on the Measurement of Subsurface Damage in Microground Optical Glasses, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 77, 3277 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.1994.tb04585.x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lucca, DA, Wetteland, CJ, Misra, A, Klopfstein, MJ, Nastasi, M, Maggiore, CJ, Tesmer, JR, Assessment of subsurface damage in polished II–VI semiconductors by ion channeling, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. Phys. Res. B 219–220, 611 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2004.01.129. [Google Scholar]
  14. Menapace, JA, Davis, PJ, Steele, WA, Wong, LL, Suratwala, TI, Miller, PE, in Proceedings of the Boulder Damage Symposium XXXVII: Annual Symposium on Optical Materials for High Power Lasers, Boulder, 2005 (SPIE, 2005), p. 599103. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.638839. [Google Scholar]
  15. Shafrir, SN, Lambropoulos, JC, Jacobs, SD, Subsurface damage and microstructure development in precision microground hard ceramics using magnetorheological finishing spots, Appl. Opt. 46, 5500 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.46.005500. [Google Scholar]
  16. Elfallagh, F, Inkson, BJ, 3D analysis of crack morphologies in silicate glass using FIB tomography, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 29, 47 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2008.05.042. [Google Scholar]
  17. Neauport, J, Cormont, P, Legros, P, Ambard, C, Destribats, J, Imaging subsurface damage of grinded fused silica optics by confocal fluorescence microscopy, Opt. Express 17, 3543 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.17.003543. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Wang, C, Tian, A, Wang, H, Li, B, Jiang, Z, in Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Experimental Mechanics, Singapore, 2009 (SPIE, 2009), 75226K. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.852363. [Google Scholar]
  19. Neauport, J, Ambard, C, Cormont, P, Darbois, N, Destribats, J, Luitot, C, Rondeau, O, Subsurface damage measurement of ground fused silica parts by HF etching techniques, Opt. Express 17, 20448 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.17.020448. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Sergeeva, M, Khrenikov, K, Hellmuth, T, Boerret, R, Sub surface damage measurements based on short coherent interferometry, J. Eur. Opt. Soc. Rapid. Publ. 5, 10003 (2010). https://doi.org/10.2971/jeos.2010.10003. [Google Scholar]
  21. Li, Y, Huang, H, Xie, R, Li, H, Deng, Y, Chen, X, et al., A method for evaluating subsurface damage in optical glass, Opt. Express 18, 17180 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.18.017180. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Ma, B, Shen, Z, He, P, Ji, Y, Sang, T, Jiao, H, et al., Subsurface quality of polished SiO2 surface evaluated by quasi-Brewster angle technique, Optik. 122, 1418 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2010.09.019. [Google Scholar]
  23. Ma, B, Shen, Z, He, P, Sha, F, Wang, C, Wang, B, et al., Evaluation and analysis of polished fused silica subsurface quality by the nanoindenter technique, Appl. Opt. 50, C279–C285 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.50.00C279. [Google Scholar]
  24. Trost, M, Herffurth, T, Schmitz, D, Schröder, S, Duparré, A, Tünnermann, A, Evaluation of subsurface damage by light scattering techniques, Appl. Opt. 52, 6579 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.52.006579. [Google Scholar]
  25. Aida, H, Takeda, H, Kim, S-W, Aota, N, Koyama, K, Yamazaki, T, Doi, T, Evaluation of subsurface damage in GaN substrate induced by mechanical polishing with diamond abrasives, Appl. Surf. Sci. 292, 531 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.12.005. [Google Scholar]
  26. Li, HN, Yu, TB, Da Zhu, L, Wang, WS, Evaluation of grinding-induced subsurface damage in optical glass BK7, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 229, 785 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.11.003. [Google Scholar]
  27. Luo, J, Huynh, H, Pantano, CG, Kim, SH, Hydrothermal reactions of soda lime silica glass – Revealing subsurface damage and alteration of mechanical properties and chemical structure of glass surfaces, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 452, 93 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2016.08.021. [Google Scholar]
  28. Seiler, M, Tianis, L, Bliedtner, J, Berlinger, M, Gürtler, S, in Proceedings of the Conferences on Optical Technologies, München, 2019 (EPJ Web Conferences 215, Les Ulis, 2019), p. 08001. https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201921508001. [Google Scholar]
  29. Wu, X, Gao, W, He, Y, Liu, H, Quantitative measurement of subsurface damage with self-referenced spectral domain optical coherence tomography, Opt. Mater. Express 7, 3919 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1364/OME.7.003919. [Google Scholar]
  30. Schnurbusch, G, Brinksmeier, E, Riemer, O, Influence of cutting speed on subsurface damage morphology and distribution in ground fused Silica, Inventions 2, 15 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3390/inventions2030015. [Google Scholar]
  31. Trum, CJ, Vogt, C, Sitzberger, S, Rascher, R, Faehnle, O, in Proceedings of the Fifth European Seminar on Precision Optics Manufacturing, Teisnach, 2018, edited by Rascher, R. and Schopf, C. (Proceedings Volume 10826, SPIE, 2018), p. 11. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2318576. [Google Scholar]
  32. Yin, J, Bai, Q, Haitjema, H, Zhang, B, Two-dimensional detection of subsurface damage in silicon wafers with polarized laser scattering, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 284, 116746 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2020.116746. [Google Scholar]
  33. Liu, J, Liu, J, Liu, C, Wang, Y, 3D dark-field confocal microscopy for subsurface defects detection, Opt. Lett. 45, 660 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.384487. [Google Scholar]
  34. Miller, PE, Suratwala, TI, Wong, LL, Feit, MD, Menapace, JA, Davis, PJ, Steele, RA., in Proceedings of the Boulder Damage Symposium XXXVII: Annual Symposium on Optical Materials for High Power Lasers, Boulder, 2005, edited by Gregory, JE., Arthur, HG., Keith, LL., Detlev, R., Soileau, MJ., Christopher, JS. (Proceedings Volume 5991, SPIE 2005), p. 599101. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.638821. [Google Scholar]
  35. Börret, R, Wiedemann, D, Kelm, A, in Proceedings of the 58th Ilmenau Scientific Colloquium (Technical University of Ilmenau, Ilmenau, 2014). https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:gbv:ilm1-2014iwk-199:0. [Google Scholar]
  36. Cui, Y, Wang, C, Liu, X, Wu, Y, Li, Z, Li, R, He, W, A review of subsurface damage detection methods for optical components, AIP Adv. 13, (2023). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0151498. [Google Scholar]
  37. Frank, S, Seiler, M, Bliedtner, J, Three-dimensional evaluation of subsurface damage in optical glasses with ground and polished surfaces using FF-OCT, Appl. Opt. 60, 2118 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.413090. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Shen, J, Liu, S, Yi, K, He, H, Shao, J, Fan, Z, Subsurface damage in optical substrates, Optik 116, 288 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2005.02.002. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. Lu, W, Pei, ZJ, Sun, JG, Non-destructive evaluation methods for subsurface damage in silicon wafers: a literature review, IJMMM 2, 125 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMMM.2007.012672. [Google Scholar]
  40. Wang, J, Li, YG, Han, JH, Xu, Q, Guo, YB, Evaluating subsurface damage in optical glasses, J. Eur. Opt. Society-Rapid Publ. 6, (2011). https://doi.org/10.1051/jeos.2011.11001. [Google Scholar]
  41. Yin, J, Bai, Q, Zhang, B, Methods for detection of subsurface damage: a review, Chin. J. Mech. Eng. 31, (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s10033-018-0229-2. [Google Scholar]
  42. Frank, S, Schwörer, L, Alvan, V, Hohmann, P, Burger, I, Jedamzik, S, et al., in Proceedings of the Eleventh European Seminar on Precision Optics Manufacturing, Teisnach, 2024, edited by Fütterer, G., Wünsche, C., Fähnle, OW., Thieß, H. and Ahaberl, A. (Proceedings Volume 13221, SPIE, 2024), p. 5. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3031491. [Google Scholar]
  43. Frank, S, Reichenbächer, M, Seiler, M, Arnold, T, Bliedtner, J, in Proceedings of the EOSAM 2023, Dijon, 2023 (EPJ Web Conferences 287, Les Ulis, 2023), p. 5024. https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202328705024. [Google Scholar]
  44. Hu, Y, Gao, W, Detecting subsurface damage within glasses with polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography, Opt. Laser Technol. 177, 111146 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2024.111146. [Google Scholar]
  45. Ou, L, He, H, Wang, F, Sun, L, Yu, J, Recent advances in the characterization of subsurface damage in optical materials, Materials (Basel) 18, (2025). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18163883. [Google Scholar]
  46. Thelemann, D, Frank, S, Schneider, K, Henkel, S, Schulze, C, Bliedtner, J, in Proceedings of the Twelfth European Seminar on Precision Optics Manufacturing, Teisnach, 2025, edited by Fütterer, G., Wünsche, C., Fähnle, OW., Thieß, H. and Ahaberl, A. (Proceedings Volume 13789, SPIE, 2025), p. 7. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3075984. [Google Scholar]
  47. Seiler, M, Frank, S, Thelemann, D, Elies, O, Teymori, P, Bliedtner, J, How laser material processing can benefit from OCT technology, Photonics Views 22, 52 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1002/phvs.202400037. [Google Scholar]
  48. Nie, J, Wang, Y, Wang, D, Ding, Y, Zhou, C, Wang, J, et al., Method for extracting optical element information using optical coherence tomography, Sensors (Basel) 24, 6953 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/s24216953. [Google Scholar]
  49. Wang, L, Fu, R, Xu, C, Xu, M, Methods and applications of full-field optical coherence tomography: a review, J. Biomed. Opt. 27, 050901(2022). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.27.5.050901. [Google Scholar]
  50. Huang, D, Swanson, EA, Lin, CP, Schuman, JS, Stinson, WG, Chang, W, et al., Optical coherence tomography, Science 254, 1178 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1957169. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Stifter, D, Beyond biomedicine: a review of alternative applications and developments for optical coherence tomography, Appl. Phys. B 88, 337 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00340-007-2743-2. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  52. Fujimoto, J, Swanson, E, The development, commercialization, and impact of optical coherence tomography, invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 57, OCT1–OCT13 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.16-19963. [Google Scholar]
  53. Su, R, Kirillin, M, Chang, EW, Sergeeva, E, Yun, SH, Mattsson, L, Perspectives of mid-infrared optical coherence tomography for inspection and micrometrology of industrial ceramics, Opt. Express 22, 15804 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.22.015804. [Google Scholar]
  54. Sakamoto, F, Takahashi, T, Tatami, J, Iijima, M, Prediction of strength based on defect analysis in Al2O3 ceramics via non-destructive and three-dimensional observation using optical coherence tomography, J. Ceram. Soc. Japan 127, 462 (2019). https://doi.org/10.2109/jcersj2.19020. [Google Scholar]
  55. Toyokura, S, Contactless mapping of ceramic green density using optical coherence tomography, Open Ceram. 5, 100061 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceram.2021.100061. [Google Scholar]
  56. Takahashi, T, Sakamoto, F, Tatami, J, Iijima, M, In situ observation of evolution of internal structure of alumina during sintering by swept‐source OCT, Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol. 19, 1171 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1111/ijac.13909. [Google Scholar]
  57. Kopycinska-Müller, M, Schreiber, L, Schwarzer-Fischer, E, Günther, A, Phillips, C, Moritz, T, et al., Signal-decay based approach for visualization of buried defects in 3-D printed ceramic components imaged with help of optical coherence tomography, Materials 16, 3607 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16103607. [Google Scholar]
  58. Chen, Z, Shen, Y, Bao, W, Li, P, Wang, X, Ding, Z, Identification of surface defects on glass by parallel spectral domain optical coherence tomography, Opt. Express 23, 23634 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.23.023634. [Google Scholar]
  59. Guss, G, Bass, I, Hackel, R, Mailhiot, C, Demos, SG, in Proceedings of the Boulder Damage Symposium XXXIX: Annual Symposium on Optical Materials for High Power Lasers, Boulder, 2007, edited by Gregory, JE., Arthur, HG., Keith, LL., Detlev, R., Soileau, MJ., Christopher, JS. (Proceedings Volume 6720, SPIE, 2007), p. 67201F. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.748452. [Google Scholar]
  60. Hou, F, Zhang, M, Zheng, Y, Ding, L, Tang, X, Liang, Y, Detection of laser-induced bulk damage in optical crystals by swept-source optical coherence tomography, Opt. Express 27, 3698 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.27.003698. [Google Scholar]
  61. Frank, S, Zhang, W, Thelemann, D, Elies, O, Arnold, T, Bliedtner, J, in Proceedings of the EOSAM 2024, Neapel, 2024 (EPJ Web Conferences 309, Les Ulis, 2024), p. 3010. https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202430903010. [Google Scholar]
  62. Frank, S, Reichenbächer, M, Seiler, M, Thelemann, D, Arnold, T, Bliedtner, J, Revealing subsurface damage morphology and patterns in areal ultrashort pulse laser machining of glass, Lasers Manuf. Mater. Proc. 11, 631 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40516-024-00262-9. [Google Scholar]
  63. Müller, H, Arnold, T, in Proceedings of the Twelfth European Seminar on Precision Optics Manufacturing, Teisnach, 2025, edited by Fütterer, G., Wünsche, C., Fähnle, OW., Thieß, H. and Ahaberl, A. (Proceedings Volume 13789, SPIE, 2025), p. 5. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3074295. [Google Scholar]
  64. Yang, F, Effect of subsurface damage on indentation behavior of ground ULE™ glass, J. non-Cryst. Solids 351, 3861 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2005.10.022. [Google Scholar]
  65. Yao, P, Wang, W, Huang, CZ, Wang, J, Zhu, HT, Kuriyagawa, T, Indentation crack initiation and ductile to brittle transition behavior of fused Silica, AMR 797, 667 (2013). https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.797.667. [Google Scholar]
  66. Weeks, WP, Flores, KM, Improving the precision of Vickers indentation measurements in soda-lime glass with increased dwell time, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 605, 122174 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2023.122174. [Google Scholar]
  67. Sung, Y, Yoshida, S, Kato, Y, Kurkjian, C, Three‐dimensional densification measurement of Vickers‐indented glass using digital holographic tomography, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 102, 5866 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.16508. [Google Scholar]
  68. Lacondemine, T, Réthoré, J, Maire, É, Célarié, F, Houizot, P, Roux-Langlois, C, et al., Direct observation of the displacement field and microcracking in a glass by means of X-ray tomography during in situ Vickers indentation experiment, Acta Mater. 179, 424 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2019.07.053. [Google Scholar]
  69. Arnold, T, Boehm, G, Eichentopf, I-M, Janietz, M, Meister, J, Schindler, A, Plasma jet machining, Vak. Forsch. Prax. 22, 10 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1002/vipr.201000423. [Google Scholar]
  70. Arnold, T, Boehm, G, Paetzelt, H, New freeform manufacturing chains based on atmospheric plasma jet machining, J. Eur. Opt. Soc.-Rapid Publ. 11, 16002 (2016). https://doi.org/10.2971/jeos.2016.16002. [Google Scholar]
  71. Arnold, T, Böhm, G, Paetzelt, H, Ultra‐precision surface machining with reactive plasma jets, Contrib. Plasma Phys. 54, 145 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/ctpp.201310058. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  72. Müller, H, Böhm, G, Arnold, T, in Proceedings of the Sixth European Seminar on Precision Optics Manufacturing, Teisnach, 2019, edited by Rascher, R. and Schopf, C. (Proceedings Volume 11171, SPIE, 2019), p. 21. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2526746. [Google Scholar]
  73. Arnold, T, Böhm, G, Fechner, R, Meister, J, Nickel, A, Frost, F, et al., Ultra-precision surface finishing by ion beam and plasma jet techniques – status and outlook, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 616, 147 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2009.11.013. [Google Scholar]
  74. Müller, H, Waak, T, Birnbaum, U, Böhm, G, Arnold, T, Atmospheric plasma jet processing for figure error correction of an optical element made from S-BSL7, J. Eur. Opt. Soc.-Rapid Publ. 18, 4 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1051/jeos/2022003. [Google Scholar]
  75. Kazemi, F, Boehm, G, Arnold, T, An investigation on effectiveness of temperature treatment for fluorine‐based reactive plasma jet machining of N‐BK7®, Plasma Process. Polym. 17 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/ppap.202000016. [Google Scholar]
  76. Hagan, JT, Cone cracks around Vickers indentations in fused silica glass, J. Mater. Sci. 14, 462 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00589840. [Google Scholar]
  77. Lawn, B, Wilshaw, R, Indentation fracture: principles and applications, J. Mater. Sci. 10, 1049 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00823224. [Google Scholar]
  78. Li, C, Ding, J, Zhang, L, Wu, C, Sun, L, Lin, Q, et al., Densification effects on the fracture in fused silica under Vickers indentation, Ceram. Int. 48, 9330 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.12.128. [Google Scholar]
  79. Tomić, Z, Jukić, K, Jarak, T, Fabijanić, TA, Tonković, Z, Phase-field modeling of fused silica cone-crack Vickers indentation, Nanomaterials (Basel) 12 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12142356. [Google Scholar]
  80. Michel, MD, Serbena, FC, Lepienski, CM, Effect of temperature on hardness and indentation cracking of fused silica, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 352, 3550 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2006.02.113. [Google Scholar]
  81. Suratwala, TI, Wong, L, Miller, PE, Feit, MD, Menapace, JA, Steele, R, et al., Sub-surface mechanical damage distributions during grinding of fused silica, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 352, 5601–5617 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2006.09.012. [Google Scholar]
  82. Wong, L, Suratwala, T, Feit, MD, Miller, PE, Steele, R, The effect of HF/NH4F etching on the morphology of surface fractures on fused silica, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 355, 797 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2009.01.037. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  83. Konstantinova, TG, Andronic, MM, Baklykov, DA, Stukalova, VE, Ezenkova, DA, Zikiy, EV, et al., Deep multilevel wet etching of fused silica glass microstructures in BOE solution, Sci. Rep. 13, 5228 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-32503-w. [Google Scholar]
  84. Enni, K, Sreelakshmy, K, Lal R, M, Comparative study on the effects of dry and wet etching on surface characteristics of fused silica optics, Opt. Mater. 162, 116809 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2025.116809. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.