EDP Sciences logo
Submit your research paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 22 / No 1 (2026) J. Eur. Opt. Society-Rapid Publ., 22 1 (2026) 24 References
Open Access
Issue
J. Eur. Opt. Society-Rapid Publ.
Volume 22, Number 1, 2026
Article Number 24
Number of page(s) 15
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/jeos/2026012
Published online 14 April 2026
  1. Saad A, et al., Refractive outcomes of small lenticule extraction (SMILE) Pro® with a 2 MHz femtosecond laser, Int. Ophthalmol. 44(1), 52 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-024-02915-2. [Google Scholar]
  2. Pradhan KR, Arba-Mosquera S. Smart, Sight correction of compound myopic astigmatism treatments with preoperative astigmatism >1.00 diopter using the SCHWIND ATOS: A retrospective case series, J. Refract. Surg. 40(5), e328–e335 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20240415-02. [Google Scholar]
  3. Teng P, et al., Acoustic studies of the role of immersion in plasma-mediated laser ablation, IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 23(10), 1845–1852 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1109/JQE.1987.1073233. [Google Scholar]
  4. Niemz MH, Klancnik EG, Bille JF. Plasma-mediated ablation of corneal tissue at 1053 nm using a Nd:YLF oscillator/regenerative amplifier laser, Lasers Surg. Med. 11(5), 426–431 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.1900110507. [Google Scholar]
  5. Aron-Rosa D, et al., Use of the neodymium-YAG laser to open the posterior capsule after lens implant surgery: A preliminary report, J. Am. Intraocul. Implant. Soc. 6(4), 352–354 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0146-2776(80)80036-x. [Google Scholar]
  6. Krasnov MM. Laseropuncture of anterior chamber angle in glaucoma, Am. J. Ophthalmol. 75(4), 674–678 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9394(73)90819-2. [Google Scholar]
  7. Reinstein DZ et al., Accuracy and reproducibility of artemis central flap thickness and visual outcomes of LASIK with the Carl Zeiss Meditec VisuMax femtosecond laser and MEL 80 excimer laser platforms, J. Refract. Surg. 26(2), 107–119 (2010). https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20100121-06. [Google Scholar]
  8. Tinne N, et al., Effects of cavitation bubble interaction with temporally separated fs-laser pulses, J. Biomed. Opt. 19(4), 048001 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.19.4.048001. [Google Scholar]
  9. Verma S, Arba-Mosquera S, A refined model for ablation through cavitation bubbles with ultrashort pulse lasers, Photonics 11(11), 1047 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics11111047. [Google Scholar]
  10. Vogel A, et al., Mechanisms of femtosecond laser nanosurgery of cells and tissues, Appl. Phys. B Lasers Opt. 81, 1015–1047 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00340-005-2036-6. [Google Scholar]
  11. Juhasz T, et al., Corneal refractive surgery with femtosecond lasers, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quant. Electron. 5(4), 902–910 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1109/2944.796309. [Google Scholar]
  12. Dick HB, Elling M, Willert A. Femtosecond laser in ophthalmology – A short overview of current applications, Med. Laser Appl. 25(4), 258–261 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mla.2010.07.005. [Google Scholar]
  13. Farjo AA, et al., Femtosecond lasers for LASIK flap creation: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology, Ophthalmology 120(3), e5–e20 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.08.013. [Google Scholar]
  14. Ratkay-Traub I, et al., Ultra-short pulse (femtosecond) laser surgery: initial use in LASIK flap creation, Ophthalmol Clin North Am. 14(2), 347–355, viii–ix (2001). [Google Scholar]
  15. Freidank S, Vogel A, Linz N Mechanisms of corneal intrastromal laser dissection for refractive surgery: ultra-high-speed photographic investigation at up to 50 million frames per second, Biomed. Opt. Express 13(5), 3056–3079 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.455926. [Google Scholar]
  16. Stonecipher KG, et al., Laser in situ keratomileusis flap complications and complication rates using mechanical microkeratomes versus femtosecond laser: retrospective review, Med. Res. Arch. 2(3) (2015). [Google Scholar]
  17. Tinne N, et al., Interaction mechanisms of cavitation bubbles induced by spatially and temporally separated fs-laser pulses, PLoS One 9(12), e114437 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114437. [Google Scholar]
  18. Minoguchi H, Teus M, Fu H. Atomic force microscopy and scanning electron microscopy for characterization of interface surface roughness after ELITA femtosecond laser treatments, Transl. Vis. Sci. Technol. 14(10), 30 (2024). https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4934376/v1. [Google Scholar]
  19. Mian S, Abbasi O, Juhasz T. Femtosecond laser-assisted posterior lamellar keratoplasty: Initial studies of surgical technique in eye bank eyes, Ophthalmology 112, 44–49 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.06.037. [Google Scholar]
  20. Tinne N, et al., Interaction dynamics of spatially separated cavitation bubbles in water, J. Biomed. Opt. 15(6), 068003 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.3526366. [Google Scholar]
  21. Tinne N, Lübking E, Lubatschowski H, Krüger A, Ripken T. The influence of a spatial and temporal pulse-overlap on the laser-tissue-interaction of modern ophthalmic laser systems, Biomed. Eng. 57, 302–305. https://doi.org/10.1515/bmt-2012-4115. [Google Scholar]
  22. Schultz T et al., Greater vertical spot spacing to improve femtosecond laser capsulotomy quality, J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 43(3), 353–357 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.12.028. [Google Scholar]
  23. Lombardo M, et al., Surface quality of femtosecond dissected posterior human corneal stroma investigated with atomic force microscopy, Cornea 31(12), 1369–1375 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0b013e31823f774c. [Google Scholar]
  24. Amann H, Arba-Mosquera S. Optimization of the spot spacings for reducing roughness in laser-induced optical breakdown processes for corneal laser vision correction, Photonics 11(2), 114, (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics11020114. [Google Scholar]
  25. Arba-Mosquera S, Verma S. Analytical optimization of the ablation efficiency at normal and non-normal incidence for generic super Gaussian beam profiles, Biomed. Opt. Express 4(8), 1422–1433 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.4.001422. [Google Scholar]
  26. Arba-Mosquera S, et al., Analytical optimization of the cutting efficiency for generic cavitation bubbles, Biomed. Opt. Express 12(7), 3819–3835 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.425895. [Google Scholar]
  27. Arba-Mosquera S, et al., Influence of extrinsic and intrinsic parameters on myopic correction in small incision lenticule extraction, J. Refract. Surg. 35(11), 712–720 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20191003-01. [Google Scholar]
  28. Pradhan KR, Arba-Mosquera S. Comparing high and low energy outcomes on day one for SmartSight myopic-astigmatism treatments with the SCHWIND ATOS: a retrospective case series, BMC Ophthalmol. 23, 328 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-023-03076-z. [Google Scholar]
  29. Darzi S, Pradhan KR, Arba-Mosquera S. Enhancing predicted visual acuity after smartsight lenticule extraction: identifying key factors with machine learning, J. Refract. Surg. 40(12), e974–e984 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20241030-01. [Google Scholar]
  30. Sobutas S, Arba-Mosquera S. Model of the effects of femtosecond laser pulse energy on the effective z-position of the resulting cut after laser-induced optical breakdown, Photonics 11(8), 685, (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics11080685. [Google Scholar]
  31. Ryu S, et al., Optimizing plasma formation and minimizing microcavitation to enhance clinical outcomes in keratorefractive lenticule extraction, J. Refract. Surg. 41(7), e635–e644 (2025). https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20250509-05. [Google Scholar]
  32. Park ES et al., Reducing higher-order aberrations after keratorefractive lenticule extraction using asymmetric spacing spot/track distances with low-energy levels, J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 51(10), 895–902 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001713. [Google Scholar]
  33. Verma S, Hesser J, Arba-Mosquera S. Optimum laser beam characteristics for achieving smoother ablations in laser vision correction. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 58(4), 2021–2037 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.16-21025. [Google Scholar]
  34. Bohač M, et al., Epithelial remodelling in myopia after keratorefractive lenticule extraction, Ophthalmol. Ther. 14(6), 1237–1247 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-025-01138-7. [Google Scholar]
  35. Gabric I, Pradhan KR, Arba-Mosquera S. Unique features of the ATOS laser for lenticule extraction: programming, intraoperative software use, and dissection techniques, in Femtosecond Laser Assisted Lenticule Extraction: Principles, Techniques, Complication Management, and Future Concepts in KLEx, edited by W. Sekundo, F. M. Wagner (Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham, 2024), pp. 339–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-60424-9_24. [Google Scholar]
  36. Pradhan K, Arba-Mosquera S, Lenticule and interface properties and geometries in SmartSight®, in Femtosecond Laser Assisted Lenticule Extraction: Principles, Techniques, Complication Management, and Future Concepts in KLEx, edited by W. Sekundo, F. M. Wagner (Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham, 2024), pp. 329–338 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-60424-9_23 [Google Scholar]
  37. Pradhan KR et al., Clinical results of SmartSight in four years experience, in Femtosecond Laser Assisted Lenticule Extraction: Principles, Techniques, Complication Management, and Future Concepts in KLEx, edited by W. Sekundo, F. M. Wagner (Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham, 2024), pp. 349–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-60424-9_25. [Google Scholar]
  38. Taneri S, et al., Results of thin-cap small-incision lenticule extraction, J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 47(4), 439–444 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000470. [Google Scholar]
  39. Brar S, Ganesh S, Bhargav S. Comparison of intraoperative time taken for docking, lenticule dissection, and overall workflow for SMILE performed with the VisuMax 800 versus the VisuMax 500 femtosecond laser, J. Refract. Surg. 39(9), 648 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20230726-03. [Google Scholar]
  40. Li H, et al., Multi-focus non-periodic scanning method for femtosecond lasers based on DMD and galvanometer scanners [Invited], Chin. Opt. Lett. 22(5), 051701 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1364/COL.22.051701. [Google Scholar]
  41. Juhasz T, et al., Time-resolved observations of shock waves and cavitation bubbles generated by femtosecond laser pulses in corneal tissue and water, Lasers Surg. Med. 19(1), 23–31 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9101(1996)19:1%3C23::AID-LSM4%3E3.0.CO;2-S. [Google Scholar]
  42. Kehrer T, Arba-Mosquera S, A simple cornea deformation model, Adv. Opt. Technol. 10(6), 433–450 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1515/aot-2021-0039. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.