EDP Sciences logo
Submit your research paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 22 / No 1 (2026) J. Eur. Opt. Society-Rapid Publ., 22 1 (2026) 25 References
Open Access
Issue
J. Eur. Opt. Society-Rapid Publ.
Volume 22, Number 1, 2026
Article Number 25
Number of page(s) 10
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/jeos/2026014
Published online 17 April 2026
  1. Pathak M, Sahu V, Kumar A, Kaur K, Gurnani B, Current concepts and recent updates of optical biometry – A comprehensive review, Clin. Ophthalmol. 2(18), 1191–1206 (2024). https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S464538. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bang SP, Kumar P, Yoon G, Quantifying ocular microaberration using a high-resolution Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor, Biomed. Opt. Express. 16(8), 3128–3138 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.566011. [Google Scholar]
  3. Belda-Para C, Velarde-Rodríguez G, Velasco-Ocaña M, et al., Comparing the clinical applicability of wavefront phase imaging in keratoconus versus normal eyes, Sci. Rep. 14(1), 9984 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-60842-9. [Google Scholar]
  4. Iyer RV, Nasrin F, See E, Mathews S, Smoothing splines on unit ball domains with application to corneal topography, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 36(2), 518–526 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2016.2618389. [Google Scholar]
  5. Nasrin F, Iyer RV, Mathews SM, Simultaneous estimation of corneal topography, pachymetry, and curvature, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging 37(11), 2463–2473 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2018.2836304. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ortiz S, Siedlecki D, Remon L, Marcos S, Three-dimensional ray tracing on Delaunay-based reconstructed surfaces, Appl. Opt. 48(20), 3886–3893 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.48.003886. [Google Scholar]
  7. Lévy B, Zhang H, Spectral mesh processing, in ACM SIGGRAPH 2010 Courses. SIGGRAPH ‘10 (Association for Computing Machinery, 2010). https://doi.org/10.1145/1837101.1837109. [Google Scholar]
  8. Mahajan VN, Acosta Eva, Zernike coefficients from wavefront curvature data. Appl. Opt. 59, G120–G128 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.391958. [Google Scholar]
  9. Xianfeng Gu D, Saucan E, Classical and Discrete Differential Geometry. Theory, Applications and Algorithms (CRC Press, 2023). [Google Scholar]
  10. Taubin G. A signal processing approach to fair surface design, in Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques. SIGGRAPH ‘95 (1995), pp. 351–358. https://doi.org/10.1145/218380.218473. [Google Scholar]
  11. Reuter M, Wolter FE, Peinecke N, Laplace–Beltrami spectra as “Shape-DNA” of surfaces and solids, Comput. Aid. Design 38(4), 342–366 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2005.10.011. [Google Scholar]
  12. Karni Z, Gotsman C, Spectral Compression of Mesh Geometry, in Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH Conference on Computer Graphics. 08, 2000 (2001), pp. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/344779.344924. [Google Scholar]
  13. Arvanitis G, Lalos AS, Moustakas K, Spectral processing for denoising and compression of 3D meshes using dynamic orthogonal iterations, J. Imag. 6, 6 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging6060055. [Google Scholar]
  14. Shamir A, A survey on mesh segmentation techniques, Computer Graphic. Forum 27(6), 1539–1556 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8659.2007.01103.x. [Google Scholar]
  15. Sun X, Rosin PL, Martin R, Langbein F, Fast and effective feature-preserving mesh denoising, IEEE Trans. Visual. Computer Graph. 13(5), 925–938 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2007.1065. [Google Scholar]
  16. Ovsjanikov M, Sun J, Guibas L, Global intrinsic symmetries of shapes, in Proceedings of the Symposium on Geometry Processing. SGP ‘08 (Eurographics Association, 2008), pp. 1341–1348. [Google Scholar]
  17. Chertok M, Keller Y, Spectral symmetry analysis. Pattern analysis and machine intelligence, IEEE Trans. 08(32), 1227–1238 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2009.121. [Google Scholar]
  18. Kolluri R, Shewchuk JR, O’Brien JF, Spectral surface reconstruction from noisy point clouds, in Proceedings of the 2004 Eurographics/ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Geometry Processing. SGP ‘04 (2004), pp. 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1145/1057432.1057434. [Google Scholar]
  19. Narendra M, Valarmathi ML, Anbarasi LJ. Watermarking techniques for three-dimensional (3D) mesh models: a survey. Multimedia Syst. 28(2), 623–641 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00530-021-00860-z. [Google Scholar]
  20. Reuter M, Biasotti S, Giorgi D, Patanè G, Spagnuolo M. Discrete Laplace–Beltrami operators for shape analysis and segmentation, Comput. Graph. 33(3), 381–390 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cag.2009.03.005. [Google Scholar]
  21. Zhang J, Qiao Y, Sarabi MS, et al., 3D shape modeling and analysis of retinal microvasculature in OCT-angiography images, IEEE Trans.Med. Imaging. 39(5), 1335–1346 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2019.2948867. [Google Scholar]
  22. Goetz A. Introduction to Differential Geometry (Addison-Wesley Publishing, 1968). [Google Scholar]
  23. Urakawa H. Geometry of Laplace–Beltrami operator on a complete Riemannian manifold, in Proceedings of Progress in Differential Geometry, Adv. Stud. Pure Math. 22, 347–406 (1993). [Google Scholar]
  24. Barbero S, Free-form surface discretization through surface embedded circle involutes. Submitted. [Google Scholar]
  25. Dong Q, Wang Z, Li M, et al., Laplacian2Mesh: Laplacian-based mesh understanding, IEEE Trans. Visual. Computer Graph. 30(7), 4349–4361 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  26. Rusinkiewicz S, Estimating curvatures and their derivatives on triangle meshes, in Proceedings. 2nd International Symposium on 3D Data Processing, Visualization and Transmission, 2004. 3DPVT 2004 (2004), pp. 486–493. [Google Scholar]
  27. Max N, Weights for computing vertex normals from facet normals, J. Graphics Tools 4(2), 1–6 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  28. Chen X, Schmitt F, Intrinsic surface properties from surface triangulation, in Computer Vision — ECCV’92, edited by G. Sandini (1992), pp. 739–743. [Google Scholar]
  29. Ortiz S, Pérez-Merino P, de Castro A, Marcos S, In vivo human crystalline lens topography, Biomed. Opt. Express 10(3), 2471–2488 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.3.002471. [Google Scholar]
  30. Barbero S, The concept of geodesic curvature applied to optical surfaces, Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt. 35(4), 388–393 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.12216. [Google Scholar]
  31. de Castro A, Martínez-Enríquez E, Marcos S, Effect of fixational eye movements in corneal topography measurements with optical coherence tomography, Biomed. Opt. Express. 14(5), 2138–2152 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.486460. [Google Scholar]
  32. Cavas-Martínez F, Bataille L, Fernández-Pacheco DG, Cañavate FJF, Alió J.l. A new approach to keratoconus detection based on corneal morphogeometric analysis, PLoS One 12(9), e0184569 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184569. [Google Scholar]
  33. Kreyszig E. Differential Geometry (Dover, New York, 1991). [Google Scholar]
  34. Goldstein H, Poole CP, Safko JL, Classical Mechanics, Third Edition (Harlow, Pearson, 2011). [Google Scholar]
  35. Rodríguez P, Navarro R, Rozema JJ, Eigencorneas: Application of principal component analysis to corneal topography, Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt. 34(6), 667–677 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.12155. [Google Scholar]
  36. Martinez-Enriquez E, de Castro A, Marcos S. Eigenlenses: a new model for full crystalline lens shape representation and its applications, Biomed Opt Express 11(10), 5633–5649 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.397695. [Google Scholar]
  37. Ruiz-Calvo A, Ansah D, Celik U, MacRae S, Marcos S, Martínez-Enríquez E, Automatic segmentation and quantification of OCT images before and after cataract surgery using deep learning, Appl. Opt. 63(20), 5376–5386 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.524950. [Google Scholar]
  38. Ballesta A, Velázquez JS, Barrio JLA del, Cavas F, Partial reconstruction of sparse and incomplete point clouds applied to the generation of corneal topographic maps of healthy and diseased patients, Measurement 240, 115613 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  39. Martínez-Enríquez E, Curatolo A, de Castro A, et al., Estimation of the full shape of the crystalline lens in-vivo from OCT images using eigenlenses, Biomed. Opt. Express 14(2), 608–626 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.477557. [Google Scholar]
  40. Rozema JJ, Rodríguez P, Navarro R, Koppen C. Bigaussian wavefront model for normal and keratoconic eyes, Optom. Vis. Sci. 94(6), 680–687 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  41. Wachinger C, Golland P, Kremen W, Fischl B, M R. Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging initiative. BrainPrint: a discriminative characterization of brain morphology. Neuroimage 1(109), 232–248 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  42. Burman E, Hansbo P, Larson MG, Larsson K, Massing A, Finite element approximation of the Laplace–Beltrami operator on a surface with boundary, Numerische Mathematik. 141(1), 141–172 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00211-018-0990-2. [Google Scholar]
  43. Salvi A, Arnal L, Ly K, et al., Ocular Biometry OCR: a machine learning algorithm leveraging optical character recognition to extract intra ocular lens biometry measurements, Front. Artif. Intell. 7, 1–15 (2025). https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2024.1428716. [Google Scholar]
  44. Wu Y, Fu R, Peng Y, Chen Q, Graph Convolutional networks for learning Laplace–Beltrami Operators, in Proceedings of the Geometry-Grounded Representation Learning and Generative Modeling Workshop (GRaM), Vol. 251 (PMLR, 2024), pp. 318–331. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.