EDP Sciences logo
Submit your research paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 22 / No 1 (2026) J. Eur. Opt. Society-Rapid Publ., 22 1 (2026) 22 References
Issue
J. Eur. Opt. Society-Rapid Publ.
Volume 22, Number 1, 2026
Recent Advances on Optics and Photonics 2026
Article Number 22
Number of page(s) 23
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/jeos/2026009
Published online 09 April 2026
  1. Huang ZF, Zhang Z, Li T, et al., Digital empowerment for the deep integration of culture and tourism: Theoretical logic and research framework, Tour. Sci. 38, 1–16 (2024). https://lykx.sitsh.edu.cn/CN/Y2024/V38/I1/1. [Google Scholar]
  2. Hua J, Chen QH, Immersive experience: A new business form of culture and technology, J. Shanghai Univ. Finance Econ. 21, 18–32 (2019). https://doi.org/10.16538/j.cnki.jsufe.2019.05.002. [Google Scholar]
  3. Karnchanapayap G, Activities-based virtual reality experience for better audience engagement, Comput. Hum. Behav. 146, 107796 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107796. [Google Scholar]
  4. Park J, Kang H, Huh C, Lee MJ, Do immersive displays influence exhibition attendees’ satisfaction?: A stimulus-organism-response approach, Sustainability 14, 6344 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14106344. [Google Scholar]
  5. Yao J, Wang L, Pang Q, Fang M, Coupling coordination and spatial analyses of the MICE and tourism industries: Do they fit well? Curr. Issues Tour. 27, 2783–2796 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2023.2240473. [Google Scholar]
  6. Trunfio M, Jung T, Campana S, Mixed reality experiences in museums: Exploring the impact of functional elements of the devices on visitors’ immersive experiences and post-experience behaviours, Inf. Manag. 59, 103698 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2022.103698. [Google Scholar]
  7. Liu X, Wen ZW, Song S, et al., Speckle-reduced green and yellow-green Nd:YVO4(YAG)/PPMgLN lasers for cinema exhibition industry, Optik 243, 167427 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2021.167427. [Google Scholar]
  8. Liu X, Zeng XT, Shi WJ, et al., Application of a novel Nd:YAG/PPMgLN laser module speckle-suppressed by multi-mode fibers in an exhibition environment, Photonics 9, 46 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics9010046. [Google Scholar]
  9. Houston J, Beck W, Design considerations for cinema exhibition using RGB laser illumination, SMPTE Motion Imaging J. 124, 26–41 (2015). https://doi.org/10.5594/j18547. [Google Scholar]
  10. Bruno F, Bruno S, De Sensi G, et al., From 3D reconstruction to virtual reality: A complete methodology for digital archaeological exhibition, J. Cult. Herit. 11, 42–49 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2009.02.006. [Google Scholar]
  11. Pratisto EH, Thompson N, Potdar V, Immersive technologies for tourism: A systematic review, Inf. Technol. Tour. 24, 181–219 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40558-022-00228-7. [Google Scholar]
  12. Collin-Lachaud I, Passebois J, Do immersive technologies add value to the museum-going experience? An exploratory study conducted at France’s Paleosite, Int. J. Arts Manag. 11, 60–71 (2018). https://www.jstor.org/stable/41064975. [Google Scholar]
  13. Ku ECS, Embracing the future of interactive marketing with contactless technology: Evidence from tourism businesses, J. Res. Interact. Mark. 19, 1 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-04-2024-0183. [Google Scholar]
  14. The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica, Interactive Media, (2025). https://www.britannica.com/technology/interactive-media (accessed 2 February 2025). [Google Scholar]
  15. Zimeng G, Wei Y, Qiuxia C, Xiaoting H, The contribution and interactive relationship of tourism industry development and technological innovation to the informatization level: Based on the context of low-carbon development, Front. Environ. Sci. 11, 999675 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.999675. [Google Scholar]
  16. Hua J, Zhou F, Xia Z, et al., Large-scale metagrating complex-based light field 3D display with space-variant resolution for non-uniform distribution of information and energy, Nanophotonics 12, 285–295 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2022-0637. [Google Scholar]
  17. Khuderchuluun A, Erdenebat MU, Dashdavaa E, et al., Comprehensive optimization for full-color holographic stereogram printing system based on single-shot depth estimation and time-controlled exposure, Opt. Laser Technol. 181, 111966 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2024.111966. [Google Scholar]
  18. Wang T, Yang C, Chen J, et al., Naked-eye light field display technology based on mini/micro light emitting diode panels: A systematic review and meta-analysis, Sci. Rep. 14, 24381 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-75172-z. [Google Scholar]
  19. Liu S, Li Y, Su Y, Recent progress in true 3D display technologies based on liquid crystal devices, Crystals 13, 1639 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst13121639. [Google Scholar]
  20. Gao HY, Yao QX, Liu P, et al., Latest development of display technologies, Chin. Phys. B 25, 094203 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1056/25/9/094203. [Google Scholar]
  21. Hoffman DM, Girshick AR, Akeley K, Banks MS, Vergence–accommodation conflicts hinder visual performance and cause visual fatigue, J. Vision 8, 33 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1167/8.3.33. [Google Scholar]
  22. Fattal D, Peng Z, Tran T, et al., A multi-directional backlight for a wide-angle, glasses-free three-dimensional display, Nature 495, 348–351 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11972. [Google Scholar]
  23. Blackwell C, Can C, Khan J, et al., Volumetric 3D display in real space using a diffractive lens, fast projector, and polychromatic light source, Opt. Lett. 44, 4901–4904 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.44.004901. [Google Scholar]
  24. Trolinger JD, The language of holography, Light: Adv. Manuf. 2, 34 (2021). https://doi.org/10.37188/lam.2021.034. [Google Scholar]
  25. Liu X, Yang HX, Lin HY, et al., Application of laser holographic technology in modern exhibitions and shows, Laser Infrared 52, 787–795 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-5078.2022.06.001. [Google Scholar]
  26. An J, Won K, Kim Y, et al., Slim-panel holographic video display, Nat. Commun. 11, 5568 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19298-4. [Google Scholar]
  27. Zhou P, Li Y, Chen CP, et al., 30.4: Multi-plane holographic display with a uniform 3D Gerchberg-Saxton algorithm, SID Symp Dig. Tech. Pap. 46, 442–445 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/sdtp.10411. [Google Scholar]
  28. Shi L, Li B, Kim C, et al., Towards real-time photorealistic 3D holography with deep neural networks, Nature 591, 234–239 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-03152-0. [Google Scholar]
  29. Li J, Smithwick Q, Chu D, Holobricks: Modular coarse integral holographic displays, Light Sci. Appl. 11, 57 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-022-00742-7. [Google Scholar]
  30. Panteliadou P, Optical illusions in architecture: Towards a novel classification of architectural works, Int. J. Image 2, 127–142 (2012). https://doi.org/10.18848/2154-8560/CGP/v02i02/44037. [Google Scholar]
  31. Art & Architecture. Millennium Park Foundation (2026). Retrieved January 15, 2026, from www.millenniumparkfoundation.org/art-architecture. [Google Scholar]
  32. Cheng JH, Lin HH, Design and development of interactive LED display for fan applications, in: Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Applied System Invention (ICASI), Chiba, Japan, 13–17 April 2018 (IEEE, New York, 2018), pp. 393–396. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASI.2018.8394265. [Google Scholar]
  33. Ortega MXP, Ramírez JCD, Castro JWV, et al., Application of the technical-pedagogical resource 3D holographic LED-fan display in the classroom, Smart Learn. Environ. 7, 32 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-020-00136-5. [Google Scholar]
  34. Cultural tourism projects. Hunan Ruyi Culture Technology Co., Ltd. (2026). Retrieved January 15, 2026, from https://www.ruyuan3d.com/en/cultural-tourism-projects.htm. [Google Scholar]
  35. Jia-yuan L, Nian-yu Z, Jing L, et al., Trend of action on the display effect based on Pepper’s ghost images affected by illumination and color temperature from LED light sources, Chin. Opt. 16, 339–347 (2023). https://doi.org/10.37188/co.2022-0027. [Google Scholar]
  36. Trajkova M, Desphande M, Knowlton A, Cassandra Monden, Duri Long, Brian Magerko. AI Meets Holographic Pepper’s Ghost: A Co-Creative Public Dance Experience. DIS ’23 Companion: Companion Publication of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference, 2023, 274–278. https://doi.org/10.1145/3563703.35966. [Google Scholar]
  37. Trajkova M, Desphande M, Knowlton A, et al., AI meets holographic Pepper’s ghost: A co-creative public dance experience, in: Proceedings of DIS Companion ’23, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 10–14 July 2023 (ACM, New York, 2023), 274–278. https://doi.org/10.1145/3563703.3596658. [Google Scholar]
  38. Chlubna T, Milet T, Zemčík P, Out-of-focus artifacts mitigation and autofocus methods for 3D displays, Vis. Inform. 9, 31–42 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visinf.2024.12.001. [Google Scholar]
  39. Watanabe H, Okaichi N, Omura T, et al., Aktina Vision: Full-parallax three-dimensional display with 100 million light rays, Sci. Rep. 9, 17688 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-54243-6. [Google Scholar]
  40. Suh YW, Oh J, Kim HM, et al., Three-dimensional display-induced transient myopia and the difference in myopic shift between crossed and uncrossed disparities, Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 53, 5029–5032 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.12-9588. [Google Scholar]
  41. Naked eye 3D series. Ningbo Weizhen (2026). Retrieved January 15, 2026, from http://www.wz-xs.com/en/Content/625367.html. [Google Scholar]
  42. Liu X, Li H, The progress of light-field 3-D displays, Inf. Disp. 30, 6–14 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2637-496x.2014.tb00760.x. [Google Scholar]
  43. Jian L, Qiudong Z, Si C, et al., New type of glasses-free suspending stereoscopic display system, Opt. Tech. 39, 323–327 (2013). https://doi.org/10.3788/gxjs20133904.0323. [Google Scholar]
  44. Bogaert L, Meuret Y, De Smet H, Thienpont H, Analysis of two novel concepts for multiview three-dimensional displays using one projector, Opt. Eng. 49, 127401 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.3524240. [Google Scholar]
  45. Hwang J, Shin J, Lee D, et al., A living lab approach for concurrent 3D documentation of an architectural renovation project – a showcase of Gunsan Civic Cultural Center, Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci. XLVIII-2/W4, 227–232 (2024). https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-xlviii-2-w4-2024-227-2024. [Google Scholar]
  46. Sohn Y, Park Y, Lin L, Jung M, ’Eternal Recurrence’: Development of a 3D water curtain system and real-time projection mapping for a large-scale systems artwork installation, Digit. Creat. 31, 133–142 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2020.1762664. [Google Scholar]
  47. Nar D, Kotecha R, Optimal waypoint assignment for designing drone light show formations, Results Control Optim. 9, 100174 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rico.2022.100174. [Google Scholar]
  48. Okuda S, Hashimoto N, Projection mapping using a rotating volumetric 3D display, Proc. SPIE 11766, 117661O (2021). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2591029. [Google Scholar]
  49. International drone formation performance competition concludes with Shenzhen’s GAOJU Innovation achieving excellent results. CCTV.com (2025). Retrieved January 15, 2026, from https://local.cctv.com/2025/06/18/ARTIXOmnUn8sB3Y6N0UcgcKj250618.shtml. [Google Scholar]
  50. Schuck M, Dahanaggamaarachchi DO, Sprenger B, Vyas V, Zhou S, Schoellig AP, SwarmGPT: Combining large language models with safe motion planning for drone swarm choreography, IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 10, 12237–12244 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2025.3619745. [Google Scholar]
  51. Smith DR, Pendry JB, Wiltshire MCK, Metamaterials and negative refractive index, Science 305, 788–792 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1096796. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  52. Maeda Y, Miyazaki D, Maekawa S, Volumetric aerial three-dimensional display based on heterogeneous imaging and image plane scanning, Appl. Opt. 54, 4109–4115 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.54.004109. [Google Scholar]
  53. Kim YM, Jung KM, Min SW, Analysis of off-axis integral floating system using concave mirror, J. Opt. Soc. Korea 16, 270–276 (2012). https://doi.org/10.3807/JOSK.2012.16.3.270. [Google Scholar]
  54. Martinez C, Lee Y, Clement N, Sermet F, Sarrasin D, Multi-user volumetric 360° display based on retro-reflective transparent surfaces, Opt. Express 28, 39524–39543 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.409181. [Google Scholar]
  55. Omoto T, Fujii K, Yasugi M, et al., 3D aerial display combining optical see-through aerial imaging by retro-reflection with depth-fused 3D display, Proc. Int. Display Workshops 29, 379–382 (2022). https://doi.org/10.36463/idw.2022.0379. [Google Scholar]
  56. Zhao BC, Huang RY, Lv GJ, Retro-reflection based projection 3D display with low crosstalk, Optik 226, 165691 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2020.165691. [Google Scholar]
  57. Ochiai Y, Kumagai K, Hoshi T, et al., Fairy Lights in femtoseconds: Aerial and volumetric graphics rendered by focused femtosecond laser combined with computational 3D fields, ACM Trans. Graph. 35, 17 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2850414. [Google Scholar]
  58. Gibney E, Star Wars-style 3D images created from single speck of foam, Nature 575, 272–273 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-03454-y. [Google Scholar]
  59. Hirayama R, Martinez Plasencia D, Masuda N, et al., A volumetric display for visual, tactile and audio presentation using acoustic trapping, Nature 575, 320–323 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1739-5. [Google Scholar]
  60. Zong Q, Wu JY, Chou PY, et al., Revelation and addressing of accommodation shifts in microlens array-based 3D near-eye light field displays, Opt. Lett. 45, 228–231 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.45.000228. [Google Scholar]
  61. Liu L, Cai J, Pang Z, Teng D, Super multi-view near-eye 3D display with enlarged field of view, Opt. Eng. 60, 085103 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.OE.60.8.085103. [Google Scholar]
  62. Liu B, Sang X, Yu X, et al., Multi-rays computational floating light-field display based on holographic functional screen, Optik 172, 406–411 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2018.07.006. [Google Scholar]
  63. Liu Z, Heredia Conde M, Evaluation and compensation of the effect of dirt on time-of-flight 3d imaging systems, IEEE Sens. J. 22, 16595–16606 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2022.3189773. [Google Scholar]
  64. Watanabe H, Omura T, Okaichi N, Kano M, Sasaki H, Arai J, Full-parallax three-dimensional display based on light field reproduction, Opt. Rev. 29, 366–374 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10043-022-00752-1. [Google Scholar]
  65. Zhao CB, Liu YJ, Huang YY, Zhang XT, Xing Y, Wang QH, Photonics breakthroughs 2024: Large-viewing-angle light field 3D display based on high-precision beam directionality, IEEE Photon. J. 17, 5200107 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1109/JPHOT.2025.3551384. [Google Scholar]
  66. Chlubna T, Milet T, Zemčík P, How capturing camera trajectory distortion affects user experience on looking glass 3D display, Multimed. Tools Appl. 83, 20265–20287 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-16350-5. [Google Scholar]
  67. Chlubna T, Milet T, Zemčík P, Automatic 3D-display-friendly scene extraction from video sequences and optimal focusing distance identification, Multimed. Tools Appl. 83, 74535–74562 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-024-18573-6. [Google Scholar]
  68. Song S, Lin HY, Shi WJ, et al., Small yellow-green Nd:YAG/PPMgLN laser module at 561.3 nm, Optik 232, 166557 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2021.166557. [Google Scholar]
  69. Yang T, Wang Y, Xin L, et al., Design of imaging and display systems combining freeform optics and holographic optical elements, Acta Opt. Sin. 44, 0900001 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3788/AOS231830. [Google Scholar]
  70. Gao C, Li Z, Wu R, et al., Development and prospect of portable three-dimensional displays, Laser Optoelectron. Prog. 60, 0811009 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3788/LOP230459. [Google Scholar]
  71. Liu X, Zhai RX, Geng ST, et al., Design and application of laser-engraved carbon quantum dots rewritable fluorescent paper in modern exhibitions and shows, Phys. Status Solidi RRL. 19, e202500314 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1002/pssr.202500314. [Google Scholar]
  72. Xing F, Shi Z, Chang H, et al., Holographic stereogram: From printing to computing, Laser Optoelectron. Prog. 61, 0211006 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3788/LOP232267. [Google Scholar]
  73. Zhou C, Li J, The Development of aesthetic experience through virtual and augmented reality, Sci. Rep. 14, 4290 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-53840-4. [Google Scholar]
  74. Ahmedien DAM, A drop of light: An interactive new media art investigation of human-technology symbiosis, Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun. 11, 721 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03206-y. [Google Scholar]
  75. Dai H, Chen Y, Wang M, et al., Design of multichannel tactile feedback digital glove for virtual reality, IEEE Sens. Lett. 8, 6001704 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1109/LSENS.2024.3358260. [Google Scholar]
  76. Zhan T, Yin K, Xiong J, et al., Augmented reality and virtual reality displays: Perspectives and challenges, iScience 23, 101397 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2020.101397. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.