EDP Sciences logo
Submit your research paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 21 / No 2 (2025) J. Eur. Opt. Society-Rapid Publ., 21 2 (2025) 43 References
Open Access
Issue
J. Eur. Opt. Society-Rapid Publ.
Volume 21, Number 2, 2025
Article Number 43
Number of page(s) 13
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/jeos/2025038
Published online 26 September 2025
  1. Su H, Wu Z, Zhang H, Du Q, Hyperspectral anomaly detection: a survey, IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Mag. 10, 64–90 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/MGRS.2021.3105440. [Google Scholar]
  2. Xu Y, Zhang L, Du B, Zhang L, Hyperspectral anomaly detection based on machine learning: an overview, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote. Sens. 15, 3351–3364 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2022.3167830. [Google Scholar]
  3. Xie W, Fan S, Qu J, Wu X, Lu Y, Du Q, Spectral distribution-aware estimation network for hyperspectral anomaly detection, IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Mag. 60, 5512312 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2021.3089711. [Google Scholar]
  4. Zhao C, Li C, Feng S, Li W, Spectral-spatial anomaly detection via collaborative representation constraint stacked autoencoders for hyperspectral images, IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 19, 5503105 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2021.3050308. [Google Scholar]
  5. Zhao R, Yang Z, Meng X, Shao F, A novel fully convolutional auto-encoder based on dual clustering and latent feature adversarial consistency for hyperspectral anomaly detection, Remote Sens. 16, 717 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16040717. [Google Scholar]
  6. Hu X, Xie C, Fan Z, Duan Q, Zhang D, Jiang L, Wei X, Hong D, Li G, Zeng X, Hyperspectral anomaly detection using deep learning: a review, Remote Sens. 14, 1973 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14091973. [Google Scholar]
  7. Zhang JJ, Xiang P, Shi J, Teng X, Zhao D, Zhou HX, Li H, Song JL, A light CNN based on residual learning and background estimation for hyperspectral anomaly detection, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 132, 104069 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2024.104069. [Google Scholar]
  8. Cheng X, Deep feature aggregation network for hyperspectral anomaly detection, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 73, 5033016 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2024.3403211. [Google Scholar]
  9. Reed IS, Yu X, Adaptive multiple-band CFAR detection of an optical pattern with unknown spectral distribution, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process. 38, 1760–1770 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1109/29.60107. [Google Scholar]
  10. Kwon H, Der SZ, Nasrabadi NM, Adaptive anomaly detection using subspace separation for hyperspectral imagery, Opt. Eng. 42, 3342–3351 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.1614265. [Google Scholar]
  11. Guo Q, Zhang B, Ran Q, Gao L, Li J, Plaza A, Weighted-RXD and linear filter-based RXD: improving background statistics estimation for anomaly detection in hyperspectral imagery, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 7, 2351–2366 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2014.2302446. [Google Scholar]
  12. Liu J, Hou Z, Li W, Tao R, Orlando D, Li H, Multipixel anomaly detection with unknown patterns for hyperspectral imagery, IEEE Trans. Neur. Netw. Learn. Syst. 33, 5557–5567 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2021.3071026. [Google Scholar]
  13. Ling Q, Guo Y, Lin Z, An W, A constrained sparse representation model for hyperspectral anomaly detection, IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Mag. 57, 2358–2371 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2018.2872900. [Google Scholar]
  14. Li W, Du Q, Collaborative representation for hyperspectral anomaly detection, IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Mag. 53, 1463–1474 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2014.2343955. [Google Scholar]
  15. Sun W, Liu C, Li J, Lai YM, Li W, Low-rank and sparse matrix decomposition-based anomaly detection for hyperspectral imagery, J. Appl. Remote Sens. 8, 083641 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.jrs.8.083641. [Google Scholar]
  16. Kang X, Zhang X, Li S, Li K, Li J, Benediktsson JA, Hyperspectral anomaly detection with attribute and edge-preserving filters, IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Mag. 55, 5600–5611 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2017.2710145. [Google Scholar]
  17. Li W, Wu G, Du Q, Transferred deep learning for anomaly detection in hyperspectral imagery, IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 14, 597–601 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2017.2657818. [Google Scholar]
  18. Batı E, Çalışkan A, Koz A, Alatan AA, Hyperspectral anomaly detection method based on auto-encoder, Image Signal Process. Remote Sens. 9643, 1–7 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2195180. [Google Scholar]
  19. Wang S, Wang X, Zhang L, Zhong Y, Auto-AD: autonomous hyperspectral anomaly detection network based on fully convolutional autoencoder, IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Mag. 60, 5503314 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2021.3057721. [Google Scholar]
  20. Fan G, Ma Y, Mei X, Fan F, Huang J, Ma J, Hyperspectral anomaly detection with robust graph autoencoders, IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Mag. 60, 5511314 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2021.3097097. [Google Scholar]
  21. Liu H, Su X, Shen X, Zhou C, Chen X, Zhou X, BiGSeT: binary mask-guided separation training for dnn-based hyperspectral anomaly detection (2023). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2307.07428. [Google Scholar]
  22. Ma D, Chen M, Yang Y, Li B, Li M, Gao Y, Coarse-to-fine multiview anomaly coupling network for hyperspectral anomaly detection, IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Mag. 62, 5507715 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2024.3362055. [Google Scholar]
  23. Wu ZY, Wang B, Background reconstruction via 3D-transformer network for hyperspectral anomaly detection, Remote Sens. 15, 4592 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15184592. [Google Scholar]
  24. Xiao S, Zhang T, Xu Z, Qu J, Hou S, Dong W, Anomaly detection of hyperspectral images based on transformer with spatial-spectral dual-window mask, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 16, 1414–1426 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2022.3232762. [Google Scholar]
  25. Lian J, Wang L, Sun H, Huang H, GT-HAD: gated transformer for hyperspectral anomaly detection, IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 36, 3631–3645 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2024.3355166. [Google Scholar]
  26. Wang Z, Ma D, Yue G, Li B, Cong R, Wu Z, Self-supervised hyperspectral anomaly detection based on finite spatialwise attention, IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Mag. 62, 5502918 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2023.3347270. [Google Scholar]
  27. Zhang J, Xiang P, Teng X, Zhao D, Li H, Song J, Zhou H, Tan W, Enhancing hyperspectral anomaly detection with a novel differential network approach for precision and robust background suppression, Remote Sens. 16, 434 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16030434. [Google Scholar]
  28. Li K, An W, Wang Y, Zhang T, Qin Y, Gao T, Explicit background endmember learning for hyperspectral anomaly detection, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 73, 5028817 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2024.3446609. [Google Scholar]
  29. He Z, He D, Xiao M, Lou A, Lai G, Convolutional transformer-inspired autoencoder for hyperspectral anomaly detection, IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 20, 5508905 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2023.3312589. [Google Scholar]
  30. Liu S, Peng L, Chang X, Wang Z, Wen G, Zhu C, Adaptive dual-domain learning for hyperspectral anomaly detection with state-space models, IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Mag. 63, 5503719 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2025.3530397. [Google Scholar]
  31. Sun X, Zhang Y, Dong Y, Du B, Contrastive self-supervised learning-based background reconstruction for hyperspectral anomaly detection, IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Mag. 63, 5504312 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2025.3534185. [Google Scholar]
  32. Guo Q, Cen Y, Zhang L, Zhang Y, Huang Y, Hyperspectral anomaly detection based on spatial–spectral cross-guided mask autoencoder, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 17, 9876–9889 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2024.3393995. [Google Scholar]
  33. Liu S, Guo H, Gao S, Zhang W, The spectrum difference enhanced network for hyperspectral anomaly detection, Remote Sens. 16, 4518 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16234518. [Google Scholar]
  34. Wu Z, Wang B, Transformer-based autoencoder framework for nonlinear hyperspectral anomaly detection, IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Mag. 62, 5508015 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2024.3361469. [Google Scholar]
  35. Young SS, Lin CH, Leng ZC, Unsupervised abundance matrix reconstruction transformer-guided fractional attention mechanism for hyperspectral anomaly detection, IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 36, 9150–9164 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2024.3437731. [Google Scholar]
  36. Xu YT, Zhao K, Zhang LG, Zhu MY, Zeng D, Hyperspectral anomaly detection with vision transformer and adversarial refinement, Inter. J. Remote Sens. 44, 4034–4057 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2023.2229495. [Google Scholar]
  37. Li Z, Wang Y, Xiao C, Ling Q, Lin Z, An W, You only train once: learning a general anomaly enhancement network with random masks for hyperspectral anomaly detection, IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Mag. 61, 5506718 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2023.3258067. [Google Scholar]
  38. Wang J, Ouyang T, Duan Y, Cui L, SAOCNN: self-attention and one-class neural networks for hyperspectral anomaly detection, Remote Sens. 14, 5555 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14215555. [Google Scholar]
  39. Wang X, Wang L, Wang Q, Local spatial–spectral information-integrated semisupervised two-stream network for hyperspectral anomaly detection, IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Mag. 60, 5535515 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2022.3196409. [Google Scholar]
  40. Duan Y, Ouyang T, Wang J, CRNN: collaborative representation neural networks for hyperspectral anomaly detection, Remote Sens. 15, 3357 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15133357. [Google Scholar]
  41. Wang X, Hyperspectral anomaly detection using dual-branch network based on frequency domain learning, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 18, 15789–15803 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2025.3580575. [Google Scholar]
  42. Wang J, Sun J, Xia Y, Zhang Y, Dynamic negative sampling autoencoder for hyperspectral anomaly detection, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 15, 9829–9841 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2022.3220514. [Google Scholar]
  43. Vaswani A, Shazeer N, Parmar N, Uszkoreit J, Jones L, Gomez AN, Kaiser L, Polosukhin I, Attention is all you need (2023). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1706.03762. [Google Scholar]
  44. Dosovitskiy A, Beyer L, Kolesnikov A, Weissenborn D, Zhai XH, Unterthiner T, Dehghani M, Minderer M, Heigold G, Gelly S, Uszkoreit J, Houlsby N, An image is worth 16 × 16 words: transformers for image recognition at scale (2021). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2010.11929. [Google Scholar]
  45. Hu X, Li ZX, Karimi HR, Zhang DW, Dictionary trained attention constrained low rank and sparse autoencoder for hyperspectral anomaly detection, Neural Netw. 181, 106797 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2024.106797. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.