EDP Sciences logo
Submit your research paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 21 / No 2 (2025) J. Eur. Opt. Society-Rapid Publ., 21 2 (2025) 39 References
Open Access
Issue
J. Eur. Opt. Society-Rapid Publ.
Volume 21, Number 2, 2025
Article Number 39
Number of page(s) 6
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/jeos/2025034
Published online 03 September 2025
  1. ISO 29821:2018, Condition monitoring and diagnostics of machines – Ultrasound – General guidelines, procedures and validation. Available at https://www.iso.org/standard/71196.html. [Google Scholar]
  2. Moll J, et al., Open guided waves: online platform for ultrasonic guided wave measurements, Struct. Health Monit. 18, 1903 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  3. Niese F, Roelfes T, Koerdt M, Maack B, Entwicklung eines elektromagnetischen Ultraschall-Prüfsystems auf Basis von geführten Wellen für Composite-Flugzeugstrukturen, in DGZfP Jahrestagung 2022, Kassel, Germany (2022). Available at https://www.ndt.net/?id=27075. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bergmann RB, Huke P, Advanced methods for optical non-destructive testing, in Optical imaging and metrology – Advanced technologies, edited by Osten W, Reingand N (Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany, 2012), p. 393–412. [Google Scholar]
  5. Huke P, Schröder M, Hellmers S, Kalms M, Bergmann RB, Efficient laser generation of lamb waves, Opt. Lett. 39, 5795 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  6. Maack B, In-line monitoring of cryogenic three-point bending test of fiber reinforced composites using acoustic emission, J. Compos. Mater. 58, 1461 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  7. Huber A, Sause MG, Classification of solutions for guided waves in anisotropic composites with large numbers of layers, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 144, 3236 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  8. Silitonga DJ, et al., A comprehensive study of non-destructive localization of structural features in metal plates using single and multimodal Lamb wave excitations, Acta Acust. 8, 66 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  9. Sarens B, Kalogiannakis G, Glorieux C, Van Hemelrijck D, Full-field imaging of nonclassical acoustic nonlinearity, Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 264102 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  10. Taillade F, Krapez J-C, Lepoutre F, Balageas D, Shearographic visualization of lamb waves in carbon epoxy plates interaction with delaminations, Eur. Phys. J. Appl. Phys. 9, 69 (2000). [Google Scholar]
  11. Prager J, et al. Geführte Wellen für die Ultraschallprüfung von Klebeverbindungen. Fortschritte der Akustik - DAGA 2014, Oldenburg (2014). [Google Scholar]
  12. Trushkevych O, et al. Acoustic field visualisation using local absorption of ultrasound and thermochromic liquid crystals, Ultrasonics 140, 107300 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  13. Krohn N, Busse G, Defect selective imaging by scanning laser vibrometry, AIP Conf. Proc. 615, 772 (2002). [Google Scholar]
  14. Seresini T, Sunetchiieva S, Pfeiffer H, Wevers M, Glorieux C, Defect detection in carbon fiber-reinforced plate by imaging of mechanical nonlinearity-induced sideband vibrations, Vibration 6, 796 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  15. Fernández JL, Doval ÁF, Trillo C, Deán JL, López JC, Video ultrasonics by pulsed TV holography: a new capability for non-destructive testing of shell structures, Int. J. Optomechatronics 1, 122 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  16. Focke O, Hildebrand A, Von Kopylow C, Calomfirescu M, Inspection of lamb waves in carbon fiber composites using shearographic interferometry, in Nondestructive Characterization for Composite Materials, Aerospace Engineering, Civil Infrastructure, and Homeland Security 2008, vol. 6934, 20 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  17. Asemani H, Park J, Lee J-R, Soltani N, Development of PZT-excited stroboscopic shearography for full-field nondestructive evaluation, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 88, 053301 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  18. Koenig CR, Mueller D, Focke O, Calomfirescu M, Reconstruction of impact loads within fibre reinforced polymers, Appl. Mech. Mater. 7, 209 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  19. Kolmogorov AN, Dissipation of energy in locally isotropic turbulence, Akad. Nauk SSSR Dokl. 32, 16 (1941). [Google Scholar]
  20. Takeda M, Ina H, Kobayashi S, Fourier-transform method of fringepattern analysis for computer-based topography and interferometry, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 72, 156 (1982). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Schnars U, et al., Computational wavefield sensing, in Digital holography and wavefront sensing: principles, techniques and applications, edited by Schanars U, Falldorf C, Watson J, Jueptner W (Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 2015), p. 141. [Google Scholar]
  22. Kalms M, Bergmann RB, Structure function analysis of powder beds in additive manufacturing by laser beam melting, Addit. Manuf. 36, 101396 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  23. Gutiérrez-Cañas Pazos B, Falldorf C, Bergmann RB, Characterization of form deviations on technical surfaces through structure function analysis, in Proceeddings of the 125 (Jahrestagung der DGaO, Aachen, 2024). [Google Scholar]
  24. Huber AMA, Sause MGR, Dispersion calculator rev 3.0, Available at https://github.com/ArminHuber/Dispersion-Calculator/releases/tag/v3.0 (Last viewed 14 March 2025). [Google Scholar]
  25. Ono K, Dynamic viscosity and transverse ultrasonic attenuation of engineering materials, Appl. Sci. 10, 5265 (2020). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.