EDP Sciences logo
Submit your research paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 16 / No 1 (2020) J. Eur. Opt. Soc.-Rapid Publ., 16 1 (2020) 2 References
Open Access
Issue
J. Eur. Opt. Soc.-Rapid Publ.
Volume 16, Number 1, 2020
Article Number 2
Number of page(s) 15
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/s41476-019-0124-1
Published online 08 January 2020
  1. Pfeffer M.M., Aspheric optics: from design to manufacturing and aspheric metrology. Adv. Opt. Technol. (2016) 5, 3199–200. [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  2. Lee, W.B., Cheung, B.C.F.: Surface Generation in Ultra-precision Diamond Turning: Modelling and Practices. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (2003). [Google Scholar]
  3. Saraswathamma K., Magnetorheological Finishing: A Review. International Journal of Current Engineering and Technology (2010) 2, 2168–173. https://doi.org/10.14741/ijcet/spl.2.2014.30 [Google Scholar]
  4. Schaefer, D.: Basics of ion beam figuring and challenges for real optics treatment. Proc. SPIE. 10829 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2318572. [Google Scholar]
  5. Kelm, A., Boerret, R., Sinzinger, S.: Modeling of the polishing process for aspheric optics. Proc. SPIE. 7102 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.796388. [Google Scholar]
  6. Schachtschneider R, Fortmeier I, Stavridis M, Asfour J, Berger G, Bergmann R B, Beutler A, Blümel T, Klawitter H, Kubo K, Liebl J, Löffler F, Meeß R, Pruss C, Ramm D, Sandner M, Schneider G, Wendel M, Widdershoven I, Schulz M, Elster C, Interlaboratory comparison measurements of aspheres. Measurement Science and Technology (2018) 29, 5055010. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/aaae96 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bergmans R H, Nieuwenkamp H J, Kok G J P, Blobel G, Nouira H, Küng A, Baas M, Tevoert M, Baer G, Stuerwald S, Comparison of asphere measurements by tactile and optical metrological instruments. Measurement Science and Technology (2015) 26, 10105004. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/26/10/105004 [Google Scholar]
  8. Beutler, A.: Comparison of 2D and 3D measurements of aspheres with a tactile and optical sensor on one measuring instrument. In: Classical Optics 2014, p. OTu4A.1. Optical Society of America (2014). http://www.osapublishing.org/abstract.cfm?URI=OFT-2014-OTu4A.1. Accessed 26 June 2019. [Google Scholar]
  9. Beutler, A.: Metrology for the production process of aspheric lenses. Adv. Opt. Technol. 5(3), 211–228 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1515/aot-2016-0011. [Google Scholar]
  10. EMPIR project 15SIB01: FreeFORM (2016). https://www.ptb.de/emrp/freeform-home.html. Accessed 26 June 2019. [Google Scholar]
  11. Fortmeier Ines, Schulz Michael, Meeß Rudolf, Traceability of form measurements of freeform surfaces: metrological reference surfaces. Optical Engineering (2019) 58, 091. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.OE.58.9.092602 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Garbusi E., Pruss C., Osten W., Interferometer for precise and flexible asphere testing. Opt. Lett. (2008) 33, 242973–2975. https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.33.002973 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Baer Goran, Schindler Johannes, Pruss Christof, Siepmann Jens, Osten Wolfgang, Calibration of a non-null test interferometer for the measurement of aspheres and free-form surfaces. Optics Express (2014) 22, 2531200. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.22.031200 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Panasonic (2019). https://www.panasonic.com/global/business/ua3p.html. Accessed 26 June 2019. [Google Scholar]
  15. Schachtschneider R., Stavridis M., Fortmeier I., Schulz M., Elster C., SimOptDevice: a library for virtual optical experiments. J. Sensors Sensor Syst. (2019) 8, 1105–110. https://doi.org/10.5194/jsss-8-105-2019https://doi.org/10.5194/jsss-8-105-2019 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Huber P.J., Lovric M., Robust Statistics. International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science (2011) Berlin, HeidelbergSpringer Berlin Heidelberghttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04898-2_594 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.