Open Access
Issue
J. Eur. Opt. Soc.-Rapid Publ.
Volume 10, 2015
Article Number 15045
Number of page(s) 5
DOI https://doi.org/10.2971/jeos.2015.15045
Published online 04 October 2015
  1. V. I. Man’kovsky, “Spectral contributions of the components of seawater to the beam attenuation coefficient in surface waters of the Mediterranean Sea,” Physical Oceanography 21, 305–319 (2012). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. F. Hanson, and M. Lasher, “Effects of underwater turbulence on laser beam propagation and coupling into single-mode optical fiber,” Appl. Optics 49, 3224–3230 (2010). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. H. T. Yura, “Propagation of finite cross-section laser beams in sea water,” Appl. Optics 12, 108–115 (1973). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. E. Y. S. Young, and A. M. Bullock, “Underwater-airborne laser communication system: characterization of the channel,” Proc. SPIE 4975, 146–157 (2003). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. A. N. Z. Rashed, and H. A. Sharshar, “Performance evaluation of short range underwater optical wireless communications for different ocean water types,” Wireless Pers. Commun. 72, 693–708 (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. E. Kazemian, and F. D. Kashani, “Reliability analysis of underwater optical communication links in different locations through Caspian Sea,” Optik 124, 5184–5188 (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. A. T. Reghunath, V. Venkataramanan, D. V. Suviseshamuthu, R. Krishnamohan, and B. R. Prasad, “The origin of blue-green window and the propagation of radiation in ocean waters,” Defence Sci. J. 41, 1–20 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  8. A. Morel, “Etude expérimentale de la diffusion de la lumiére par l’eau, les solutions de chlorure de sodium, et l’eau de mer optiquement pures,” J. Chim. Phys. 10, 1359–1366 (1966). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  9. A. Morel, D. Antoine, and B. Gentili, “Bidirectional reflectance of oceanic waters: accounting for Raman emission and varying particle scattering phase function,” Appl. Optics 41, 6289–6306 (2002). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. M. Ravisankar, and A. T. Reghunath, “Effect of dissolved NaCl, MgCl2, and Na2So4 in sea water on the optical attenuation in the region from 430 to 630 nm,” Appl. Optics 27, 3887–3894 (1988). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. W. S. Pegau, D. Gray, and J. R. V. Zaneveld, “Absorption and attenuation of visible and near-infrared light in water: dependence on temperature and salinity,” Appl. Optics 36, 6035–6046 (1997). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. D. H. Gadani, V. A. Rana, S. P. Bhatnagar, A. N. Prajapati, and A. D. Vyas, “Effect of salinity on the dielectric properties of water,” Indian J. Pure Ap. Phys. 50, 405–410 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  13. X. Zhang, and L. Hu, “Scattering by pure seawater at high salinity,” Opt. Express 17, 12685–12691 (2009). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. D. Stramski, E. Boss, D. Bogucki, and K. J. Voss, “The role of seawater constituents in light back scattering in the ocean,” Prog. Oceanogr. 61, 27–56 (2004). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. A. H. Hakim, and N. J. McCormick, “Ocean optics estimation for absorption, backscattering, and phase function parameters,” Appl. Optics 42, 931–938 (2003). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. M. Stramska, and M. ´Swirgo´n, “Influence of atmospheric forcing and freshwater discharge on interannual variability of the vertical diffuse attenuation coefficient at 490 nm in the Baltic Sea,” Remote Sens. Environ. 140, 155–164 (2014). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. J. M. Sullivan, M. S. Twardowski, J. R. V. Zaneveld, C. M. Moore, A. H. Barnard, P. L. Donaghay, and B. Rhoades, “Hyperspectral temperature and salt dependencies of absorption by water and heavy water in the 400–750 nm spectral range,” Appl. Optics 45, 5294–5309 (2006). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Y. Marcus, “A simple empirical model describing the thermodynamics of hydration of ions of widely varying charges, sizes, and shapes,” Biophys. Chem. 51, 111–127 (1994). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.