EDP Sciences logo
Submit your research paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 10 (2015) J. Eur. Opt. Soc.-Rapid Publ., 10 (2015) 15046 References
Open Access
Issue
J. Eur. Opt. Soc.-Rapid Publ.
Volume 10, 2015
Article Number 15046
Number of page(s) 6
DOI https://doi.org/10.2971/jeos.2015.15046
Published online 21 October 2015
  1. W. Cathey, and E. Dowski, “New paradigm for imaging systems,” Appl. Optics 41, 6080–6092 (2002). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. D. Stork, and M. Robinson, “Theoretical foundations for joint digital-optical analysis of electro-optical imaging systems,” Appl. Optics 47, B64–B75 (2008). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. F. Diaz, F. Goudail, B. Loiseaux, and J. Huignard, “Increase in depth of field taking into account deconvolution by optimization of pupil mask,” Opt. Lett. 34, 2970–2972 (2009). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. T. Vettenburg, and A. Harvey, “Holistic optical-digital hybridimaging design: wide-field reflective imaging,” Appl. Optics 52, 3931–3936 (2013). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. E. Dowski, and W. Cathey, “Extended depth of field through wavefront coding,” Appl. Optics 34, 1859–1866 (1995). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. F. Diaz, F. Goudail, B. Loiseaux, and J. Huignard, “Comparison of depth-of-focus-enhancing pupil masks based on a signal-to-noiseratio criterion after deconvolution,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 27, 2123–2131 (2010). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. O. Palillero-Sandoval, J. Félix Aguilar, and L. Berriel-Valdos, “Phase mask coded with the superposition of four Zernike polynomials for extending the depth of field in an imaging system,” Appl. Optics 53, 4033–4038 (2014). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. R. N. Zahreddine, and C. J. Cogswell, “Binary phase modulated partitioned pupils for extended depth of field,” in Proceedings to Imaging and Applied Optics 2015, IT4A.2 (Optical Society of America, Arlington, 2015). [Google Scholar]
  9. V. Le, Z. Fan, and Q. Duong, “To extend the depth of field by using the asymmetrical phase mask and its conjugation phase mask in wavefront coding imaging systems,” Appl. Optics 54, 3630–3634 (2015). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. L. Liu, F. Diaz, L. Wang, B. Loiseaux, J. Huignard, C. Sheppard, and N. Chen, “Superresolution along extended depth of focus with binary-phase filters for the Gaussian beam,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 25, 2095–2101 (2008). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. M. Demenikov, E. Findlay, and A. Harvey, “Miniaturization of zoom lenses with a single moving element,” Opt. Express 17, 6118–6127 (2009). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. G. Muyo, A. Singh, M. Andersson, D. Huckridge, A. Wood, and A. Harvey, “Infrared imaging with a wavefront-coded singlet lens,” Opt. Express 17, 21118–21123 (2009). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. X. Guo, L. Dong, Y. Zhao, W. Jia, L. Kong, Y. Wu, and B. Li, “Imaging and image restoration of an on-axis three-mirror Cassegrain system with wavefront coding technology,” Appl. Optics 54, 2798–2805 (2015). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. F. Diaz, M. Lee, X. Rejeaunier, G. Lehoucq, F. Goudail, B. Loiseaux, S. Bansropun, et al., “Real-time increase in depth of field of an uncooled thermal camera using several phase-mask technologies,” Opt. Lett. 36, 418–420 (2011). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. T. Zhao, T. Mauger, and G. Li, “Optimization of wavefront-coded infinity-corrected microscope systems with extended depth of field,” Biomed. Opt. Express 4, 1464–1471 (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. R. Zahreddine, and C. Cogswell, “Total variation regularized deconvolution for extended depth of field microscopy,” Appl. Optics 54, 2244–2254 (2015). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Y. Q. He, J. Q. Li, J. Pan, and Y. J. Li, “Optimization of phase mask based iris imaging system through the optical characteristics,” Proc. SPIE 8711, 871107 (2013). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.