EDP Sciences logo
Submit your research paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 20 / No 1 (2024) J. Eur. Opt. Society-Rapid Publ., 20 1 (2024) 17 References
Open Access
Issue
J. Eur. Opt. Society-Rapid Publ.
Volume 20, Number 1, 2024
Article Number 17
Number of page(s) 9
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/jeos/2024014
Published online 03 May 2024
  1. Tan X., Gu B.-Y., Yang G.-Z., Dong B.-Z. (1995) Diffractive phase elements for beam shaping: a new design method, Appl. Opt. 34, 1314–1320. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Li Y., Kreske K., Rosen J. (2000) Security and encryption optical systems based on a correlator with significant output images, Appl. Opt. 39, 5295–5301. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Sacconi L., Froner E., Antolini R., Taghizadeh M.R., Choudhury A., Pavone F.S. (2003) Multiphoton multifocal microscopy exploiting a diffractive optical element, Opt. Lett. 28, 1918–1920. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Wu J., Wang J., Nie Y., Hu L. (2019) Multiple-image optical encryption based on phase retrieval algorithm and fractional Talbot effect, Opt. Express 27, 35096–35107. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dai S., Zheng X., Zhao S. (2023) Designing diffractive optical elements for shaping partially coherent beams by proximity correction, Opt. Express 31, 14464–14472. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gerchberg R.W., Saxton W. (1971) A practical algorithm for the determination of phase from image and diffraction plane pictures, Optik 35, 237–250. [Google Scholar]
  7. Fienup J.R. (1982) Phase retrieval algorithms: a comparison, Appl. Opt. 21, 2758–2769. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dames M.P., Dowling R.J., McKee P., Wood D. (1991) Efficient optical elements to generate intensity weighted spot arrays: design and fabrication, Appl. Opt. 30, 2685–2691. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Yang G., Dong B., Gu B., Zhuang J., Ersoy O.K. (1994) Gerchberg–Saxton and Yang–Gu algorithms for phase retrieval in a nonunitary transform system: a comparison, Appl. Opt. 33, 209–218. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Zhou G., Chen Y., Wang Z., Song H. (1999) Genetic local search algorithm for optimization design of diffractive optical elements, Appl. Opt. 38, 4281–4290. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Laborde V., Loicq J., Hastanin J., Habraken S. (2023) Thickness optimization algorithm to improve multilayer diffractive optical elements performance, Appl. Opt. 62, 836–843. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Aagedal H., Schmid M., Beth T., Teiwes S., Wyrowski F. (1996) Theory of speckles in diffractive optics and its application to beam shaping, J. Mod. Opt. 43, 1409–1421. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Pang H., Liu W., Cao A., Deng Q. (2019) Speckle-reduced holographic beam shaping with modified Gerchberg-Saxton algorithm, Opt. Comm. 433, 44–51. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Fischer D., Sinzinger S. (2020) Evaluation of quadratic phase hologram calculation algorithms in the Fourier regime, Appl. Opt. 59, 1501–1506. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Doskolovich L.L., Mingazov A.A., Byzov E., Skidanov R., Ganchevskaya S., Bykov D.A., Bezus E.A., Podlipnov V.V., Porfirev A.P., Kazanskiy N.L. (2021) Hybrid design of diffractive optical elements for optical beam shaping, Opt. Express 29, 31875–31890. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Wu S.T., Huang S.H., Chen H., Huang Y.P. (2018) Computer generated hologram accelerated by using hybrid iterative fourier transform algorithm (HIFTA) on phase modulator LCOS, SID Symp. Dig. Tech. Pap. 49, 60–63. [Google Scholar]
  17. Chen L., Zhang H., He Z., Wang X., Cao L., Jin G. (2020) Weighted constraint iterative algorithm for phase hologram generation, Appl. Sci. Basel 10, 3652. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Pi D., Liu J. (2022) Optimized iterative method for phase-only hologram generation with speckle suppression based on quadratic phase, in: D. Chu, J. Park, C. Cheng, P. Ferraro (eds), Digital Holography and 3-D Imaging 2022, Technical Digest Series, Optica Publishing Group, paper Th3A.5. [Google Scholar]
  19. Zuo J., Leng J., Fu Y. (2022) Optimized phase-only hologram generation for high-quality holographic display, Appl. Opt. 61, 10519–10527. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Chen L., Zhang H., Cao L., Jin G. (2021) High-quality phase-only holographic projection based on bandwidth constraint optimization, in: H. Hua, B. Javidi, M. Martinez-Corral, O. Matoba, A. Stern, S. Thibault, T. Alieva, J. Ke, F. Willomitzer, F. Okten, P. Silveira, P. Banerjee, E. Stoykova, D. Chu, J. Park, F. Imai, C. Joo, M. Digman, D. Gardner, S. Gladysz, D. LeMaster, S. Basu, O. Korotkova (eds), OSA Imaging and Applied Optics Congress 2021 (3D, COSI, DH, ISA, pcAOP), OSA Technical Digest, Optica Publishing Group, paper DTu7B.2. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Nyquist H. (1924) Certain factors affecting telegraph speed, Trans. AIEE XLIII, 412–422. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.