EDP Sciences logo
Submit your research paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 15 / No 1 (2019) J. Eur. Opt. Soc.-Rapid Publ., 15 1 (2019) 16 References
Open Access
Issue
J. Eur. Opt. Soc.-Rapid Publ.
Volume 15, Number 1, 2019
Article Number 16
Number of page(s) 15
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/s41476-019-0105-4
Published online 28 June 2019
  1. Bahnasy Mahmoud, Idoudi Karim, Elbiaze Halima, OpenFlow and GMPLS Unified Control Planes: Testbed Implementation and Comparative Study. Journal of Optical Communications and Networking (2015) 7, 4301. https://doi.org/10.1364/JOCN.7.000301 [Google Scholar]
  2. Pupatwibul P, Banjar A, Sabbagh AAL, Braun R, A comparative review: accurate OpenFlow simulation tools for prototyping. J Netw (2015) 10, 5322–327. [Google Scholar]
  3. Son J, Dastjerdi AV, Calheiros RN, Ji X, Yoon Y, Buyya R, CloudSimSDN: modeling and simulation of software-defined cloud data centers. Cluster, Cloud and Grid Computing (CCGrid), 15th IEEE/ACM International Symposium (2015) first quarter [Google Scholar]
  4. The Open Networking Foundations“The OpenFlow switch specifications” Version 1.3.4 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  5. Nunes Bruno Astuto A., Mendonca Marc, Nguyen Xuan-Nam, Obraczka Katia, Turletti Thierry, A Survey of Software-Defined Networking: Past, Present, and Future of Programmable Networks. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials (2014) 16, 31617–1634. https://doi.org/10.1109/SURV.2014.012214.00180 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bhaumik P, Zhang S, Chowdhury P, Lee S-S, Lee JH, Mukherjee B, Software-defined optical networks (SDONs): a survey Springer Science+Business Media New York. Photon Netw. Commun. (2014) 28, 4_18. [Google Scholar]
  7. Singh Sanjeev, Jha Rakesh Kumar, SDOWN: A Novel Algorithm and Comparative Performance Analysis of Underlying Infrastructure in Software Defined Heterogeneous Network. Fiber and Integrated Optics (2018) 38, 143–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/01468030.2018.1519612 [Google Scholar]
  8. Singh S, Jha R, A survey on software defined networking: architecture for next generation network. J. Netw. Syst. Manag. (2017) 25, 2321–374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10922-016-9393-9 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Singh S, Jha RK, SDOWN: a novel algorithm for better quality of service and experience in software defined optical wireless network. Optik (2019) 176, 662–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2018.08.096 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gupta A, Jha RK, A survey of 5G network: architecture and emerging technologies. IEEE Access (2015) 3, 1206–1232. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2015.2461602 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhao Y, Ji Y, Zhang J, Li H, Xiong Q, Qiu S, Software defined networking (SDN) controlled all optical switching networks with multi-dimensional switching architecture. Opt. Fiber Technol. (2014) 20, 353–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yofte.2014.04.002 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Introductory White Paper: Optical Software Defined Networking. MRV Communications (2014) [Google Scholar]
  13. Introductory White Paper, “Software-Defined Networking: the New Norm for Networks (White Paper)”. https://www.opennetworking.org/sdn-resources/sdn-library/whitepapers. Accessed 2014 [Google Scholar]
  14. Zhao Y, Zhang J, Yang H, Yu Y, Which is more suitable for the control over large scale optical networks, GMPLS or OpenFlow?. Proceedings of OFC/NFOEC (2013) [Google Scholar]
  15. Liu L, Choi HY, Casellas R, Tsuritani T, Morita I, Martínez R, Munoz R, Demonstration of a dynamic transparent WSON employing flexible transmitter/receiver controlled by an open- flow/stateless PCE integrated control plane. Proceedings of OFC/NFOEC (2013) [Google Scholar]
  16. Gringeri Steven, Bitar Nabil, Xia Tiejun J., Extending software defined network principles to include optical transport. IEEE Communications Magazine (2013) 51, 332–40. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2013.6476863 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Casellas R, Munoz R, Martínez R, Path computation elements (PCEs): applications and status. Proceedings of OFC/NFOEC (2013) [Google Scholar]
  18. Martin-Minguez A, Horche PR, Simulation of transmission performance for equalized holographic ROADM designs. Óptica Pura Y Aplicada, section: Optoelectronics (2012) [Google Scholar]
  19. Shirazipour, M., John, W., Kempf, J., Green, H., Tatipamula, M.: Realizing Packet-Optical Integration with SDN and OpenFlow 1.1 Extensions. In: IEEE international conference. Communication (ICC), 6633–6633 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  20. Azodolmolky S, Nejabati R, Escalona E, Jayakumar R, Efstathiou N, Simeonidou D, Integrated OpenFlow-GMPLS Control Plane: An Overlay Model for Software Defined Packet over Optical Networks. IEEE conference and exhibition (2012) Optical Communication (ECOC), 37th European Conference [Google Scholar]
  21. Liu L, Tsuritani T, Morita I, Casellas R, Martinez R, Munoz R, Control plane techniques for elastic optical networks: GMPLS/PCE vs OpenFlow. IEEE GlobecomWorkshops (2012) 352–357. [Google Scholar]
  22. Liu L, Tsuritani T, Morita I, Experimental demonstration of OpenFlow/GMPLs interworking control plane for IP/ DWDM multi-layer optical networks. IEEE 14th Int. Conf. On Transparent Optical Networks (ICTON) (2012) 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  23. Doria A, Hadi Salim J, Haas R, Khosravi H, Wang W, Dong L, Gopal R, Halpern J, “Forwarding and Control Element Separation (ForCES) Protocol Specification”. RFC 5810 (Proposed Standard) (2010) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.