Open Access
Issue
J. Eur. Opt. Soc.-Rapid Publ.
Volume 14, Number 1, 2018
Article Number 25
Number of page(s) 12
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/s41476-018-0092-x
Published online 06 November 2018
  1. Kobayashi T, Akamatsu D, Hosaka K, Inaba H, Okubo S, Tanabe T, Yasuda M, Onae A, Hong FL, Compact iodine-stabilized laser operating at 531 nm with stability at the 10−12 level and using a coin-sized laser module. Opt. Express (2015) 23, 20749–20759. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.23.020749 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bruner A, Mahal V, Kiryuschev I, Arie A, Arbore MA, Fejer MM, Frequency stability at the kilohertz level of a rubidium-locked diode laser at 192.114 THz. Appl. Opt. (1998) 37, 6410–6414. https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.37.006410 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bertinetto F, Cordiale P, Galzerano G, Bava E, Frequency stabilization of DBR diode laser against Cs absorption lines at 852 nm using the modulation transfer method. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. (2001) 50, 490–492. https://doi.org/10.1109/19.918173 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Duong QA, Vu TT, Higuchi M, Wei D, Aketagawa M, Iodine-frequency-stabilized laser diode and displacement-measuring interferometer based on sinusoidal phase modulation. Meas. Sci. Technol. (2018) 29, 6065204. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/aab706 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Vu TT, Maeda Y, Aketagawa M, Sinusoidal frequency modulation on laser diode for frequency stabilization and displacement measurement. Measurement (2015) 94, 927–933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2015.12.021 [Google Scholar]
  6. Vu TT, Higuchi M, Aketagawa M, Accurate displacement-measuring interferometer with wide range using an I2 frequency-stabilized laser diode based on sinusoidal frequency modulation. Meas. Sci. Technol. (2016) 27, 10105201. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/27/10/105201 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Arie A, Schiller S, Gustafson EK, Byer RL, Absolute frequency stabilization of diode-laser-pumped Nd: YAG laser to hyperfine transition in molecular iodine. Opt. Lett. (1992) 17, 1204–1206. https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.17.001204 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Reinhardta S, Saathoff G, Karpuk S, Novotny C, Huber G, Zimmermann M, Holzwarth R, Udem T, Hansch TW, Gwinner G, Iodine hyperfine structure and absolute frequency measurements at 565, 576, and 585 nm. Opt. Commun. (2006) 261, 282–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2005.12.029 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Whittaker EA, Gehrtz M, Bjorklund GC, Residual amplitude modulation in laser electro-optic phase modulation. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B (1985) 2, 1320–1326. https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAB.2.001320 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Wong NC, Hall JL, Servo control of amplitude modulation in frequency-modulation spectroscopy: demonstration of shot-noise-limited detection. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B (1985) 2, 91527–1533. https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAB.2.001527 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Shirley JH, Modulation transfer processes in optical heterodyne saturation spectroscopy. Opt. Lett. (1982) 7, 537–539. https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.7.000537 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. McCarron DJ, King SA, Cornish SL, Modulation transfer spectroscopy in atomic rubidium. Meas. Sci. Technol. (2008) 19, 10105601. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/19/10/105601 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Burck FD, Lopez O, Correction of the distortion in frequency modulation spectroscopy. Meas. Sci. Technol. (2004) 15, 1327–1336. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/15/7/015 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Jaatinen E, Chartier J-M, Possible influence of residual amplitude modulation when using modulation transfer with iodine transitions at 543 nm. Metrologia (1998) 35, 75–81. https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/35/2/2 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Schuldt T, Döringshoff K, Reggentin M, Kovalchuk EV, Gohlke M, Weise D, Johann U, Peters A, Braxmaier C, A high-performance iodine-based frequency reference for space applications. Proc. SPIE (2017) 10564, 105641N-1. [Google Scholar]
  16. Makinouchi S, Watanabe A, Takasaki M, Ohara T, Ong JH, Wakui S, An evaluation of a modulated laser encoder. Precis. Eng. (2011) 35, 302–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2010.11.008 [Google Scholar]
  17. Ohara T, Scanning probe position encoder (SPPE): a new approach for high-precision and high-speed position measurement system. Proc. SPIE (2001) 4344, 52–561. [Google Scholar]
  18. Li L, Liu F, Wang C, Chen L, Measurement and control of residual amplitude modulation in optical phase modulation. Rev. Sci. Instrum. (2012) 83, 043111. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4704084 [Google Scholar]
  19. Cooper DE, Watjen JP, Two-tone optical heterodyne spectroscopy with a tunable lead-salt diode laser. Opt. Lett. (1986) 11, 606–608. https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.11.000606 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Whittaker EA, Shum CM, Grebel H, Lotem H, Reduction of residual amplitude modulation in frequency-modulation spectroscopy by using harmonic frequency modulation. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B (1988) 5, 1253–1256. https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAB.5.001253 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Tai Z, Yan L, Zhang Y, Zhang X, Guo W, Zhang S, Jiang H, Electro-optic modulator with ultra-low residual amplitude modulation for frequency modulation and laser stabilization. Opt. Lett. (2016) 41, 5584–5587. https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.41.005584 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. NEOARK Corp. NEO-92SI-NF iodine stabilized He-Ne laser: User manual. http://neoark.co.jp/en/index.php/laser-product/. Accessed 16 Oct 2018. [Google Scholar]
  23. Gerstenkorn S, Luc P, Atlas du spectre d’absorption de la molecule d’iode 15734–15756 cm−1 (1977) FranceLaboratoire Aim’e Cotton, CNRS II, Orsay [Google Scholar]
  24. Snyder JJ, Raj RK, Bloch D, Ducloy M, High-sensitivity nonlinear spectroscopy using a frequency-offset pump. Opt. Lett. (1980) 5, 163–165. https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.5.000163 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Supplee JM, Whittaker EA, Lenth W, Theoretical description of frequency modulation and wavelength modulation spectroscopy. Appl. Opt. (1994) 33, 6294–6302. https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.33.006294 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kokeyama K, Izumi K, Korth WZ, Lefebvre NS, Arai K, Adhikari RX, Residual amplitude modulation in interferometric gravitational wave detectors. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A (2014) 31, 81–88. https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.31.000081 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Roussey M, Bernala MP, Courjal N, Labeke DV, Baida F, Electro-optic effect exaltation on lithium niobate photonic crystals due to slow photons. Appl. Phys. Lett. (2006) 89, 241110. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2402946 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Ziegler JG, Nichols NB, Optimum settings for automatic controllers. J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control. (1993) 115, 220–222. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2899060 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Bitou Y, Sasaki K, Iwasaki S, Hong FL, Compact I2-stabilized frequency-doubled Nd:YAG laser for long gauge block interferometer. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. (2003) 42, 2867. https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.42.2867 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Ye J, Ma LS, Hall JL, Molecular iodine clock. Phys. Rev. Lett. (2001) 87, 270801–270804. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.270801 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.