EDP Sciences logo
Submit your research paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 14 / No 1 (2018) J. Eur. Opt. Soc.-Rapid Publ., 14 1 (2018) 22 References
Open Access
Issue
J. Eur. Opt. Soc.-Rapid Publ.
Volume 14, Number 1, 2018
Article Number 22
Number of page(s) 11
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/s41476-018-0090-z
Published online 03 October 2018
  1. Lin H, Gao J, Mei Q, et al.Three-dimensional shape measurement technique for shiny surfaces by adaptive pixel-wise projection intensity adjustment[J]. Opt. Lasers Eng. (2017) 91, 206–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2016.11.015 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Kaura SK, Chhachhia DP, Aggarwal AK, Interferometric moiré pattern encoded security holograms[J]. J. Opt. A Pure Appl. Opt. (2006) 8, 167. https://doi.org/10.1088/1464-4258/8/1/010 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Peng J, Liu X, Deng D, et al.Suppression of projector distortion in phase-measuring profilometry by projecting adaptive fringe patterns[J]. Opt. Express (2016) 24, 1921846. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.24.021846 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Zhou P, Liu X, He Y, et al.Phase error analysis and compensation considering ambient light for phase measuring profilometry[J]. Opt. Lasers Eng. (2014) 55, 799–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2013.10.027 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Zhang Z, Wang Y, Huang S, et al.Three-dimensional shape measurements of specular objects using phase-measuring Deflectometry:[J]. Sensors (2017) 17, 122835. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17122835 [Google Scholar]
  6. Lee H, Min YK, Moon JI, Three-dimensional sensing methodology combining stereo vision and phase-measuring profilometry based on dynamic programming[J]. Opt. Eng. (2017) 56, 121. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.OE.56.12.124107 [Google Scholar]
  7. Yun H, Li B, Zhang S, Pixel-by-pixel absolute three-dimensional shape measurement with modified Fourier transform profilometry[J]. Appl. Opt. (2017) 56, 51472. https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.56.001472 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Li H, Hu Y, Tao T, et al.Optimal wavelength selection strategy in temporal phase unwrapping with projection distance minimization[J]. Appl. Opt. (2018) 57, 102352. https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.57.002352 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Sun W, Wang T, Zhao Y, et al.Advanced method of global phase shift estimation from two linear carrier interferograms[J]. J. Eur. Opt. Soc. Rapid Publ. (2018) 14, 110. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41476-018-0076-x [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hu Y, Chen Q, Zhang Y, et al.Dynamic microscopic 3D shape measurement based on marker-embedded Fourier transform profilometry[J]. Appl. Opt. (2018) 57, 4772. https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.57.000772 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhou Y, Tang Y, Yang Y, et al.Topography measurement of large-range microstructures through advanced Fourier-transform method and phase stitching in scanning broadband light interferometry[J]. Micromachines (2017) 8, 11319. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi8110319 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Su X, Zhang Q, Dynamic 3-D shape measurement method: a review[J]. Opt. Lasers Eng. (2010) 48, 2191–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2009.03.012 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Li, B., Zhang, S.: High-resolution, real-time to superfast 3D imaging techniques[C]// IEEE international conference on advanced intelligent mechatronics. IEEE. 1252–1257 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  14. Jeught SVD, Dirckx JJJ, Real-time structured light profilometry: a review[J]. Opt. Lasers Eng. (2016) 87, 18–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2016.01.011 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Zhang ZH, Review of single-shot 3D shape measurement by phase calculation-based fringe projection techniques[J]. Opt. Lasers Eng. (2012) 50, 81097–1106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2012.01.007 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Xiao Y, Li Y, High-quality binary fringe generation via joint optimization on intensity and phase[J]. Opt. Lasers Eng. (2017) 97, 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2017.05.006 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Zhang S, Comparative study on passive and active projector nonlinear gamma calibration[J]. Appl. Opt. (2015) 54, 133834–3841. https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.54.003834 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lu, F., Wu, C.: Three-dimensional measurement of object surface by using ellipse binary defocusing projection. Journal of the European Optical Society-Rapid Publications. 13(1), 29 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  19. Dai J, An Y, Zhang S, Absolute three-dimensional shape measurement with a known object[J]. Opt. Express (2017) 25, 910384. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.25.010384 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Geiger A, Roser M, Urtasun R, Efficient large-scale stereo matching. Comput. Vision – Accv (2011) 6492, 25–38. [Google Scholar]
  21. Li ZW, Shi YS, Wang CJ, Wang YY, et al.Accurate calibration method for a structured light system. Opt. Eng. (2008) 47, 053604. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.2931517 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.