EDP Sciences logo
Submit your research paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 13 / No 1 (2017) J. Eur. Opt. Soc.-Rapid Publ., 13 1 (2017) 18 References
Open Access
Issue
J. Eur. Opt. Soc.-Rapid Publ.
Volume 13, Number 1, 2017
Article Number 18
Number of page(s) 7
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/s41476-017-0046-8
Published online 15 June 2017
  1. Healy AM, Corrigan OI, Allan JEM, The effect of dissolution on the surface texture of model solid-dosage forms as assessed by non-contact laser profilometry. Pharm Technol Eur (1995) 9, 14–22. [Google Scholar]
  2. May RK, Evans MJ, Zhong S, Warr I, Gladden LF, Shen V, Zeitler JA, Terahertz in-line sensor for direct coating thickness of individual tablets during film coating in real-time. J Pharm Sci (2011) 100, 1535–1544. https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.22359 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Storme-Paris I, Rebiere H, Matoga M, Civade C, Bonnet P-A, Tissimer MH, Chaminade P, Challenging near infrared spectroscopy discriminating ability of counterfeit pharmaceutical detection. Anal Chim Acta (2010) 658, 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2009.11.005 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Roggo Y, Dgardin K, Margot P, Identification of pharmaceutical tablets by Raman spectroscopy and chemometrics. Talanta (2010) 81, 988–995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2010.01.046 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Rowe RC, Gloss measurement on film coated tablets. J Pharm Pharmacol (1985) 37, 761–765. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-7158.1985.tb04964.x [Google Scholar]
  6. Martino R, Malet-Martino M, Gilard V, Balayssac S, Counterfeit drugs: analytical techniques for their identification. Anal Bioanal Chem (2010) 398, 77–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-010-3748-y [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Silvennoinen R, Peiponen K-E, Laakkonen P, Ketolainen J, Suihko E, Paronen P, Räsänen J, Matsuda K, On the optical inspection of the surface quality of pharmaceutical tablets. Meas Sci Technol (1997) 8, 550–554. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/8/5/014 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Peiponen K-E, Silvennoinen R, Räsänen J, Matsuda K, Tanninen VP, Optical coating inspection of pharmaceutical tablets by diffractive element. Meas Sci Technol (1997) 8, 815–818. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/8/7/018 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Juuti M, van Veen B, Peiponen K-E, Ketolainen J, Kalima V, Silvennoinen R, Pakkanen T, Local and average gloss from flat-faced sodium chloride tablets. AAPS PharmSciTech (2006) 7, E1–E6. https://doi.org/10.1208/pt070107 [Google Scholar]
  10. Bawuah P, Pierotic Mendia A, Silfsten P, Pääkkönen P, Ervasti T, Ketolainen J, Zeitler JA, Peiponen K-E, Detection of porosity of pharmaceutical compacts by terahertz radiation transmission and light reflection measurement techniques. Int J Pharm (2014) 465, 70–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2014.02.011 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Silvennoinen R, Peiponen K-E, Myller K, Specular Gloss (2008) OxfordElsevier [Google Scholar]
  12. Kuivalainen K, Oksman A, Juuti M, Myller K, Peiponen K-E, Advanced glossmeters for industrial applications. Opt Rev (2010) 17, 248–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10043-010-0043-2 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Oksman A, Kuivalainen K, Tåg C-M, Juuti M, Mattila R, Hietala E, Gane PAC, Peiponen K-E, Diffractive optical element-based glossmeter for the on-line measurement of normal reflectance of printed porous coated paper. Opt Eng (2011) 50, 043606. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.3567057 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kuivalainen K, Peiponen K-E, Myller K, Application of a diffractive element-based sensor for detection of latent fingerprints from a curved smooth surface. Meas Sci Technol (2009) 20, 077002. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/20/7/077002 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kuivalainen K, Oksman A, Peiponen K-E, Definition and measurement of statistical gloss parameters from curved objects. Appl Opt (2010) 49, 5081–5086. https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.49.005081 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.