EDP Sciences logo
Submit your research paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 9 (2014) J. Eur. Opt. Soc.-Rapid Publ., 9 (2014) 14022 References
Open Access
Issue
J. Eur. Opt. Soc.-Rapid Publ.
Volume 9, 2014
Article Number 14022
Number of page(s) 6
DOI https://doi.org/10.2971/jeos.2014.14022
Published online 11 June 2014
  1. E. Youngdale, J. Meyer, C. Hoffman, F. Bartoli, C. Grein, P. Young, H. Ehrenreich, et al., “Auger lifetime enhancement in InAs-Ga1-xInxSb superlattices,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 64, 3160–3162 (1994). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. E. K.-w. Huang, S. Abdollahi Pour, M.-A. Hoang, A. Haddadi, M. Razeghi, and M. Z. Tidrow, “Low irradiance background limited type-II superlattice MWIR M-barrier imager,” Opt. Lett. 37, 2025–2027 (2012). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. M. Razeghi, S. Abdollahi Pour, E. K. Huang, G. Chen, A. Haddadi, and B. M. Nguyen, “Type-II InAs/GaSb photodiodes and focal plane arrays aimed at high operating temperatures,” Opto-Electron. Rev. 19, 261–269 (2011). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. S. D. Gunapala, D. Z. Ting, C. J. Hill, J. Nguyen, A. Soibel, S. B. Rafol, S. A. Keo, et al., “Demonstration of 1Kx1K long-wave and mid-wave superlattice infrared focal plane arrays,” Proc. SPIE 7808, 780802–780802 (2010). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. J. B. Rodriguez, E. Plis, G. Bishop, Y. D. Sharma, H. Kim, L. Dawson, and S. Krishna, “nBn structure based on InAs/GaSb type-II strained layer superlattices,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 043514 (2007). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. E. H. Aifer, I. Vurgaftman, C. L. Canedy, J. H. Warner, E. M. Jackson, J. G. Tischler, and J. R. Meyer, “Recent progress in W-structured type-II superlattice photodiodes,” Proc. SPIE 6479, 64790Y–64790Y (2007). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. S. Abdollahi Pour, E. K.-w. Huang, G. Chen, A. Haddadi, B.-M. Nguyen, and M. Razeghi, “High operating temperature mid-wave infrared photodiodes and focal plane arrays based on type-II InAs/GaSb superlattices,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 98, 143501 (2011). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. B.-M. Nguyen, G. Chen, A. M. Hoang, S. A. Pour, S. Bogdanov, and M. Razeghi, “Effect of contact doping in superlattice-based minority carrier unipolar detectors,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 99, 033501 (2011). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. J.-B. Rodriguez, C. Cervera, and P. Christol, “A type-II superlattice period with a modified InAs to GaSb thickness ratio for midwavelength infrared photodiode performance improvement,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 251113 (2010). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. R. Taalat, J.-B. Rodriguez, M. Delmas, and P. Christol, “Influence of the period thickness and composition on the electro-optical properties of type-II InAs/GaSb midwave infrared superlattice photodetectors,” J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 47, 015101 (2014). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. R. Rehm, M. Walther, J. Schmitz, J. Fleißner, F. Fuchs, J. Ziegler, and W. Cabanski, “InAs/GaSb superlattice focal plane arrays for high-resolution thermal imaging,” Opto-Electron. Rev. 14, 19–24 (2006). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. E. Plis, J.-B. Rodriguez, G. Balakrishnan, Y. D. Sharma, H. S. Kim, T. Rotter, and S. Krishna, “Mid-infrared InAs/GaSb strained layer superlattice detectors with nBn design grown on a GaAs substrate,” Semicond. Sci. Tech. 25, 085010 (2010). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. J. W. Little, S. P. Svensson, W. A. Beck, A. C. Goldberg, S. W. Kennerly, T. Hongsmatip, M. Winn, and P. Uppal, “Thin active region, type II superlattice photodiode arrays: Single-pixel and focal plane array characterization,” J. Appl. Phys. 101, 044514 (2007). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. I. Ribet-Mohamed, M. Tauvy, R. Taalat, C. Cervera, J.-B. Rodriguez, and P. Christol, “Comparison of the electro-optical performances of symmetrical and asymmetrical MWIR InAs/GaSb superlattice pin photodiodes,” Proc. SPIE 8268, 826833–826833 (2012). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. I. Ribet-Mohamed, J. Le Rouzo, S. Rommeluere, M. Tauvy, and N. Guérineau, “Advanced characterization of the radiometric performances of quantum well infrared photodetectors,” Infrared Phys. Techn. 47, 119–131 (2005). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. I. Vurgaftman, E. H. Aifer, C. L. Canedy, J. G. Tischler, J. R. Meyer, J. H. Warner, E. M. Jackson, et al., “Graded band gap for dark-current suppression in long-wave infrared W-structured type-II superlattice photodiodes,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 121114 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  17. A. Wörl, P. Kleinow, R. Rehm, J. Schmitz, and M. Walther, “Noise characteristics of InAs/GaSb superlattice infrared photodiodes,” Phys. Status Solidi C 10, 744–747 (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. T. Tansel, K. Kutluer, O. Salihoglu, A. Aydinli, B. Aslan, B. Arikan, M. C. Kilinc, et al., “Effect of the passivation layer on the noise characteristics of mid-wave-infrared InAs/GaSb superlattice photodiodes,” IEEE Photonic. Tech. L. 24, 790–792 (2012). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. K. Jaworowicz, I. Ribet-Mohamed, C. Cervera, J.-B. Rodriguez, and P. Christol, “Noise characterization of midwave infrared InAs/GaSb superlattice pin photodiode,” IEEE Photonic. Tech. L. 23, 242–244 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  20. C. Cervera, I. Ribet-Mohamed, R. Taalat, J. Perez, P. Christol, and J. Rodriguez, “Dark current and noise measurements of an InAs/GaSb superlattice photodiode operating in the midwave infrared domain,” J. Electron. Mater. 41, 2714–2718 (2012). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. A. Rogalski, J. Antoszewski, and L. Faraone, “Third-generation infrared photodetector arrays,” J. Appl. Phys. 105, 091101 (2009). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. A. Rogalski, “Infrared detectors: status and trends,” Prog. Quant. Electron. 27, 59–210 (2003). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.