EDP Sciences logo
Submit your research paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 8 (2013) J. Eur. Opt. Soc.-Rapid Publ., 8 (2013) 13029 References
Open Access
Issue
J. Eur. Opt. Soc.-Rapid Publ.
Volume 8, 2013
Article Number 13029
Number of page(s) 8
DOI https://doi.org/10.2971/jeos.2013.13029
Published online 23 April 2013
  1. M. R. Arnison, D. P. Morgan-Mar, C. A. Deller, P. A. Fletcher, and K. G. Larkin, “Measurement of the lens optical transfer function using a tartan pattern,” Appl. Opt. 50(15), 2158–2169 (2011). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. C. D. Claxton, and R. C. Staunton, “Measurement of the pointspread function of a noisy imaging system,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 25(1) 159–170 (2008). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. E. Levy, D. Peles, M. Opher-Lipson, and S. G. Lipson, “Modulation transfer function of a lens measured with a random target method,” Appl. Opt. 38(4), 679–683 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  4. P. D. Lin, and W. Wu, “Calculation of the modulation transfer function for object brightness distribution function oriented along any direction in axis-symmetrical optical systems,” Appl. Opt. 50(17), 2759–2772 (2011). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. A. M. Pozo, A. Ferrero, M. Rubiño, J. Campos, and A. Pons, “Improvements for determining the modulation transfer function of charge-coupled devices by the speckle method,” Opt. Soc. Am. Optics Express 14(13), 5928–5936 (2006). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. H. Haim, N. Konforti, and E. Marom, “Performance of imaging systems analyzed with two-dimensional target,” Appl. Opt. 51(25), 5966–5972 (2012). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. P. W. Nugent, J. A. Shaw, M. R. Kehoe, C. W. Smith, T. S. Moon, and R. C. Swanson, “Measuring the modulation transfer function of an imaging spectrometer with rooflines of opportunity,” Optical Engineering 49(10) 103201 (2010). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. J. C. Feltz, and M. A. Karim, “Modulation transfer function of charge-coupled devices,” Appl. Opt. 29(5), 717–722 (1990). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. V. Havránek, “Overview of OTF measurement,” Physica 40-41, 63–86 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  10. S. M. Backman, A. J. Makynen, T. T. Kolehmainen, and K. M. Ojala, “Random target method for fast MTF inspection,” Opt. Soc. Am. 12(12) (2004). [Google Scholar]
  11. P. D. Woolliams, and P. H. Tomlins, “The modulation transfer function of an optical coherence tomography imaging system in turbid media,” Phys. Med. Biol. 56, 2855 (2011). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. G. L. Rogers, “Measurement of the modulation transfer function of paper,” Appl. Opt. 37, 7235–7240 (1998). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. A. Fernández-Oliveras, A. M. Pozo, and M. Rubiño, “Comparison of spectacle-lens optical quality by modulation transfer function measurements based on random-dot patterns,” Opt. Eng. 49(8), 083603 (2010). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. M. Marchywka, and D. G. Socker, “Modulation transfer function measurement technique for small-pixel detectors,” Appl. Opt. 31(34), 7198–7213 (1992). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. A. M. Pozo-Molina, J. J. Castro-Torres, and A. M. Rubiño-López, “Optical-quality evaluation of liquid crystal displays through the modulation transfer function using random-dot patterns,” Opt. Pura Apl. 43(1), 27–30 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  16. J. W. Goodman, Introduction to Fourier Optics (Roberts and Company Publishers, Greenwood Village, 2005). [Google Scholar]
  17. J. D. Eskin, and M. M. Blouke, “Improvements in Modeling of Diffusion-Limited Point Spread Function in Solid-State Detectors,” IEEE T. Electron Dev. 56(11), 2468–2472 (2009). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. N. N. Evtikhiev, S. N. Starikov, P. A. Cheryomkhin, and V. V. Krasnov, “Measurement of noises and modulation transfer function of cameras used in optical-digital correlators,” Proc. SPIE 8301, 830113 (2012). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. A. Mansouri, F. S. Marzani, and P. Gouton, “Development of a protocol for CCD calibration: Application to a multispectral imaging system,” Int. J. Robot. Autom. 20(2), 94–100 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  20. J. C. Mullikin, L. J. van Vliet, H. Netten, F. R. Boddeke, G. van der Feltz, and I. T. Young, “Methods for CCD camera characterization,” Proc. SPIE. 2173 73–84 (1994). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. I. MathWorks, “Matlab, release R2010b, version 7.11.,” Registered trademark of The MathWorks, Inc. (2010). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.