EDP Sciences logo
Submit your research paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 22 / No 1 (2026) J. Eur. Opt. Society-Rapid Publ., 22 1 (2026) 56 References
EOSAM 2025
Open Access
Issue
J. Eur. Opt. Society-Rapid Publ.
Volume 22, Number 1, 2026
EOSAM 2025
Article Number 56
Number of page(s) 10
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/jeos/2026049
Published online 26 June 2026
  1. Biercuk MJ et al., Ultrasensitive detection of force and displacement using trapped ions, Nature Nanotechnology 5, 646 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2010.165. [Google Scholar]
  2. Harlander M et al., Trapped-ion probing of light-induced charging effects on dielectrics, New Journal of Physics 12, 093035 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/12/9/093035. [Google Scholar]
  3. Maunz P et al., Quantum interference of photon pairs from two remote trapped atomic ions, Nature Physics 3, 538 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys644. [Google Scholar]
  4. Higginbottom DB et al., Pure single photons from a trapped atom source, New Journal of Physics 18, 093038 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/18/9/093038. [Google Scholar]
  5. Hausser HN et al., 115In+–172Yb+ Coulomb crystal clock with 2.5×10^(-18) systematic uncertainty, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 023201 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.023201. [Google Scholar]
  6. Lindvall T et al., Coordinated international comparisons between optical clocks connected via fiber and satellite links, Optica 12, 843 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.561754. [Google Scholar]
  7. Monroe C, Kim J, Scaling the ion trap quantum processor, Science 339, 1164 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1231298. [Google Scholar]
  8. Moses SA et al., A race-track trapped-ion quantum processor, Phys. Rev. X 13, 041052 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.13.041052. [Google Scholar]
  9. Mehta KK et al., Integrated optical addressing of an ion qubit, Nature Nanotechnol. 11, 1066 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2016.139. [Google Scholar]
  10. Mehta KK et al., Integrated optical multi-ion quantum logic, Nature 586, 533 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2823-6. [Google Scholar]
  11. Niffenegger RJ et al., Integrated multi-wavelength control of an ion qubit, Nature 586, 538 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2811-x. [Google Scholar]
  12. Bruzewicz CD et al., Trapped-ion quantum computing: Progress and challenges, Appl. Phys. Rev. 6, 021314 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5088164. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ivory M et al., Integrated optical addressing of a trapped Ytterbium ion, Phys. Rev. X 11, 041033 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.11.041033. [Google Scholar]
  14. Kwon J et al., Multi-site integrated optical addressing of trapped ions, Nature Commun. 15, 1 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-47882-5. [Google Scholar]
  15. Knollmann FW et al., Integrated photonic structures for photon-mediated entanglement of trapped ions, Opt. Quantum 2, 230 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1364/opticaq.522128. [Google Scholar]
  16. Mordini C et al., Multizone trapped-ion qubit control in an integrated photonics QCCD device, Phys. Rev. X 15, 011040 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.15.011040. [Google Scholar]
  17. Zesar A et al., Industrial Ion Trap Chips with Integrated Optics, in Witzens J, Poon J, Zimmermann L, Freude W (eds) The 25th European Conference on Integrated Optics (Springer Nature, Switzerland, Cham, 2024), p. 222. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-63378-2_37. [Google Scholar]
  18. Blumenthal DJ et al., Silicon nitride in silicon photonics, Proc. IEEE 106, 2209 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2018.2861576. [Google Scholar]
  19. Muñoz P et al., Silicon nitride photonic integration platforms for visible, near-infrared and mid-infrared applications, Sensors 17, 2088 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3390/s17092088. [Google Scholar]
  20. Sacher WD et al., Visible-light silicon nitride waveguide devices and implantable neurophotonic probes on thinned 200 mm silicon wafers, Opt. Express 27, 37400 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.27.037400. [Google Scholar]
  21. Leinse A, Zhang S, Heideman R, TriPleX: The versatile silicon nitride waveguide platform, in 2016 Progress in Electromagnetic Research Symposium (PIERS), p. 67 (2016). 10.1109/PIERS.2016.7734240. [Google Scholar]
  22. Chauhan N et al., Ultra-low loss visible light waveguides for integrated atomic, molecular, and quantum photonics, Opt. Express 30, 6960 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.448938. [Google Scholar]
  23. Smith JA et al., SiN foundry platform for high performance visible light integrated photonics, Opt. Mater. Express 13, 458 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1364/OME.479871. [Google Scholar]
  24. Blasco-Solvas M et al., Silicon nitride building blocks in the visible range of the spectrum, J. Lightwave Technol. 42, 6019 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1364/JLT.42.006019. [Google Scholar]
  25. Ji X et al., Efficient mass manufacturing of high-density, ultra-low-loss Si3N4 photonic integrated circuits, Optica 11, 1397 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1364/optica.529673. [Google Scholar]
  26. Isichenko A et al., Multi-laser stabilization with an atomic-disciplined photonic integrated resonator, arXiv:2509.09124 (2025). https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.09124. [Google Scholar]
  27. Corsetti SM et al., Integrated-photonics-based systems for polarization-gradient cooling of trapped ions, Light Sci. Appl. 15, 57 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-025-02094-4. [Google Scholar]
  28. Huntemann N et al., High-accuracy optical clock based on the octupole transition in 171Yb+, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 090801 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.090801. [Google Scholar]
  29. Tofful A et al., 171Yb+ optical clock with 2.2×10−18 systematic uncertainty and absolute frequency measurements, Metrologia 61, 045001 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1088/1681-7575/ad53cd. [Google Scholar]
  30. Olmschenk S et al., Manipulation and detection of a trapped Yb+ hyperfine qubit, Phys. Rev. A 76, 052314 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.76.052314. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Piltz C et al., A trapped-ion-based quantum byte with 10−5 next-neighbour cross-talk, Nature Commun. 5, 4679 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5679. [Google Scholar]
  32. Dreissen LS et al., Improved bounds on Lorentz violation from composite pulse Ramsey spectroscopy in a trapped ion, Nature Commun. 13, 7314 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-34818-0. [Google Scholar]
  33. Hur J et al., Evidence of two-source King plot nonlinearity in spectroscopic search for new boson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 163201 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.163201. [Google Scholar]
  34. Filzinger M et al., Ultralight dark matter search with space-time separated atomic clocks and cavities, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 031001 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.031001. [Google Scholar]
  35. Door M et al., Probing new bosons and nuclear structure with ytterbium isotope shifts, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 063002 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.063002. [Google Scholar]
  36. Du G, Jordan E, Mehlstäubler TE, Electric field distortions in surface ion traps with integrated nanophotonics, Phys. Rev. Appl. 25 (6) (2025) 064001. https://doi.org/10.1103/l1cn-28kv. [Google Scholar]
  37. Sun X, Liu H-C, Yariv A, Adiabaticity criterion and the shortest adiabatic mode transformer in a coupled-waveguide system, Opt. Lett. 34, 280 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.34.000280. [Google Scholar]
  38. Lin Y et al., Low-loss broadband bi-layer edge couplers for visible light, Opt. Express 29, 34565 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.435669. [Google Scholar]
  39. Zhang W et al., Buried 3D silicon photonics spot-size convertors, in 2021 IEEE 17th International Conference on Group IV Photonics (GFP), p. 1 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/GFP51802.2021.9673849. [Google Scholar]
  40. Dai D, He S, Tsang H-K, Bilevel mode converter between a silicon nanowire waveguide and a larger waveguide, J. Lightwave Technol. 24, 2428 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2006.874554. [Google Scholar]
  41. Jia L et al., Efficient suspended coupler with loss less than 1.4 dB between Si-photonic waveguide and cleaved single mode fiber, J. Lightwave Technol. 36, 239 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2017.2779863. [Google Scholar]
  42. Yi X et al., Asymmetric bi-level dual-core mode converter for high-efficiency and polarization-insensitive O-band fiber-chip edge coupling: breaking the critical size limitation, Nanophotonics 13, 4149 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2024-0320. [Google Scholar]
  43. Chen Z et al., Modeling dual-SiOxN thin-film edge coupler with ultra-low loss and large alignment tolerance, Photonics 12, 136 (2025). https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics12020136. [Google Scholar]
  44. He A et al., Low loss, large bandwidth fiber-chip edge couplers based on silicon-on-insulator platform, J. Lightwave Technol. 38, 4780 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2020.2995544. [Google Scholar]
  45. Marchetti R et al., Coupling strategies for silicon photonics integrated chips, Photon. Res. 7, 201 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1364/PRJ.7.000201. [Google Scholar]
  46. Mu J et al., Monolithic integration of Al2O3 and Si3N4 toward double-layer active–passive platform, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 25, 1 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTQE.2019.2908559. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  47. Sakai A, Go H, Baba T, Sharply bent optical waveguide silicon-on-insulator substrate, in Physics and Simulation of Optoelectronic Devices IX (SPIE) 4283, pp. 610–618 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.432614. [Google Scholar]
  48. Soldano LB, Pennings ECM, Optical multi-mode interference devices based on self-imaging: principles and applications, J. Lightwave Technol. 13, 615 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1109/50.372474. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  49. Taillaert D, Bienstman P, Baets R, Compact efficient broadband grating coupler for silicon-on-insulator waveguides, Opt. Lett. 29, 2749 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.29.002749. [Google Scholar]
  50. Beck GJ, Home JP, Mehta KK, Grating design methodology for tailored free-space beam-forming, J. Lightwave Technol. 42, 4939 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2024.3381785. [Google Scholar]
  51. Oton CJ, Long-working-distance grating coupler for integrated optical devices, IEEE Photonics Journal 8, 1 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/JPHOT.2015.2511098. [Google Scholar]
  52. Dietl M et al., Test and characterization of multilayer ion traps on fused silica, Advanced Quantum Technologies 8, e00412 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1002/qute.202500412. [Google Scholar]
  53. Hattori A et al., Integrated visible-light polarization rotators and splitters for atomic quantum systems, Opt. Lett. 49, 1794 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.509747. [Google Scholar]
  54. Gallacher K et al., Silicon nitride waveguide polarization rotator and polarization beam splitter for chip-scale atomic systems, APL Photon. 7, 046101 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0077738. [Google Scholar]
  55. Momenzadeh M et al., Individual trapped-ion addressing with adjoint-optimized multimode photonic circuits, NPJ Nanophoton. 3, 3 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44310-025-00102-4. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.