EDP Sciences logo
Submit your research paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 22 / No 1 (2026) J. Eur. Opt. Society-Rapid Publ., 22 1 (2026) 43 References
Open Access
Issue
J. Eur. Opt. Society-Rapid Publ.
Volume 22, Number 1, 2026
Article Number 43
Number of page(s) 12
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/jeos/2026037
Published online 25 May 2026
  1. Zhang T., Wu H., Liu Y., Li L., Peng J., Infrared small target detection based on local contrast measure and gradient minimization, Infrared Phys. Technol. 105, 103260 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infrared.2020.103260. [Google Scholar]
  2. Dai Y., Wu Y., Zhou F., Barnard K., A survey of infrared small target detection, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 60, 1-15 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2022.3173446. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Jocher G., Chaurasia A., Qiu J., Ultralytics YOLOv8, GitHub Repository (2023). https://github.com/ultralytics/ultralytics [Google Scholar]
  4. Bochkovskiy A., Wang C.-Y., Liao H.-Y.M., YOLOv4: Optimal speed and accuracy of object detection, arXiv:2004.10934 (2020). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2004.10934. [Google Scholar]
  5. Jocher G. et al., YOLOv5: A state-of-the-art real-time object detection system, GitHub Repository (2020). https://github.com/ultralytics/yolov5 [Google Scholar]
  6. Wang C.-Y., Bochkovskiy A., Liao H.-Y.M., YOLOv7: Trainable bag-of-freebies sets new state-of-the-art for real-time object detectors, Proc. IEEE/CVF Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit. 7464–7475 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR52733.2023.00721. [Google Scholar]
  7. Li C. et al., YOLOv6: A single-stage object detection framework for industrial applications, arXiv:2209.02976 (2022). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2209.02976 [Google Scholar]
  8. Terven J., Cordova-Esparza D., A comprehensive review of YOLO: From YOLOv1 to YOLOv8 and beyond, arXiv:2304.00501 (2023). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.00501. [Google Scholar]
  9. Vaswani A. et al., Attention is all you need, Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 30, 5998–6008 (2017). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1706.03762. [Google Scholar]
  10. Woo S., Park J., Lee J.-Y., Kweon I.S., CBAM: Convolutional block attention module, Proc. Eur. Conf. Comput. Vis., 3–19 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01234-2_1. [Google Scholar]
  11. Hu J., Shen L., Sun G., Squeeze-and-excitation networks, Proc. IEEE Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit., 7132–7141 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2018.00745. [Google Scholar]
  12. Howard A.G. et al., MobileNets: Efficient convolutional neural networks for mobile vision applications, arXiv:1704.04861 (2017). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1704.04861. [Google Scholar]
  13. Zhang X., Zhou X., Lin M., Sun J., ShuffleNet: An extremely efficient convolutional neural network for mobile devices, Proc. IEEE Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit., 6848–6856 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2018.00716. [Google Scholar]
  14. Sandler M., Howard A., Zhu M., Zhmoginov A., Chen L.-C., MobileNetV2: Inverted residuals and linear bottlenecks, Proc. IEEE Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit., 4510–4520 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2018.00474. [Google Scholar]
  15. Tan M., Le Q., EfficientNet: Rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks, Proc. Int. Conf. Mach. Learn. 97, 6105–6114 (2019). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1905.11946 [Google Scholar]
  16. Liu S., Qi L., Qin H., Shi J., Jia J., Path aggregation network for instance segmentation, Proc. IEEE Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit., 8759–8768 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2018.00913. [Google Scholar]
  17. Lin T.-Y., Dollár P., Girshick R., He K., Hariharan B., Belongie S., Feature pyramid networks for object detection, Proc. IEEE Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit., 2117–2125 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2017.106. [Google Scholar]
  18. Du D. et al., VisDrone-DET2019: The vision meets drone object detection in image challenge results, Proc. IEEE/CVF Int. Conf. Comput. Vis. Workshops, 0–0 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCVW.2019.00400. [Google Scholar]
  19. Zhu P. et al., Detection and tracking meet drones challenge, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 44, 7380–7399 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2021.3119563 [Google Scholar]
  20. Cao Y., Chen S., Zhang Y., Zhang Q., LWIR vs. MWIR vs. SWIR: A comparative study of infrared imaging for UAV-based object detection, Proc. SPIE 11740, 117400K (2021). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2588235 [Google Scholar]
  21. Everingham M., Van Gool L., Williams C.K.I., Winn J., Zisserman A., The Pascal visual object classes (VOC) challenge, Int. J. Comput. Vis. 88, 303–338 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11263-009-0275-4 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lin T.-Y. et al., Microsoft COCO: Common objects in context, Proc. Eur. Conf. Comput. Vis., 740–755 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10602-1_48. [Google Scholar]
  23. Rezatofighi H. et al., Generalized intersection over union: A metric and a loss for bounding box regression, Proc. IEEE/CVF Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit., 658–666 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2019.00075 [Google Scholar]
  24. Redmon J., Farhadi A., YOLOv3: An incremental improvement arXiv:1804.02767(2018). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1804.02767 [Google Scholar]
  25. Girshick R., Donahue J., Darrell T., Malik J., Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation, Proc. IEEE Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit., 580–587 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2014.81. [Google Scholar]
  26. Ren S., He K., Girshick R., Sun J., Faster R-CNN: Towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks, Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 28 (2015). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1506.01497. [Google Scholar]
  27. Liu W. et al., SSD: Single shot multibox detector, Proc. Eur. Conf. Comput. Vis., 21–37 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46448-0_2. [Google Scholar]
  28. Deng J. et al., ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database, Proc. IEEE Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit., 248–255 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2009.5206848. [Google Scholar]
  29. Jiang C., Ren H., Ye X., Zhu J., Zeng H., Yang N., Sun M., Ren X., Huo H., Object detection from UAV thermal infrared images and videos using YOLO models, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 112, 102912 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JAG.2022.102912. [Google Scholar]
  30. Andraši P., Radišić T., Muštra M., Ivošević J., Night-time detection of UAVs using thermal infrared camera, Transp. Res. Procedia 28, 183 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2017.12.184. [Google Scholar]
  31. Mittal P., A comprehensive survey of deep learning-based lightweight object detection models for edge devices, Artif. Intell. Rev. 57, 242 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/S10462-024-10877-1. [Google Scholar]
  32. Fan Q., Li Y., Deveci M., Zhong K., Kadry S., LUD-YOLO: A novel lightweight object detection network for unmanned aerial vehicle, Inf. Sci. 686, 121366 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.INS.2024.121366. [Google Scholar]
  33. Han B.G., Lee J.G., Lim K.T., Choi D.H., Design of a scalable and fast YOLO for edge-computing devices, Sensors 20, 6779 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/S20236779. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Li J., Ye J., Edge-YOLO: Lightweight infrared object detection method deployed on edge devices, Appl. Sci. 13, 4402 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/APP13074402. [Google Scholar]
  35. Zhang R., Li H., Duan K., You S., Liu K., Wang F., Hu Y., Automatic detection of earthquake-damaged buildings by integrating UAV oblique photography and infrared thermal imaging, Remote Sens. 12, 2621 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12162621. [Google Scholar]
  36. He K., Zhang X., Ren S., Sun J., Deep residual learning for image recognition, Proc. IEEE Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit., 770–778 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2016.90. [Google Scholar]
  37. Wu D., Cao L., Zhou P., Li N., Li Y., Wang D., Infrared small-target detection based on radiation characteristics with a multimodal feature fusion network, Remote Sens. 14, 3570 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/RS14153570. [Google Scholar]
  38. Liu Z., Zou Y., Hu Z., Xue H., Li M., Rao B., Research on multi-modal fusion detection method for low-slow-small uavs based on deep learning, Drones 9, 852 (2025). https://doi.org/10.3390/DRONES9120852. [Google Scholar]
  39. Iandola F.N. et al., SqueezeNet: AlexNet-level accuracy with 50x fewer parameters and <0.5MB model size, arXiv:1602.07360 (2016). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1602.07360. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.