EDP Sciences logo
Submit your research paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 22 / No 1 (2026) J. Eur. Opt. Society-Rapid Publ., 22 1 (2026) 9 References
Open Access
Issue
J. Eur. Opt. Society-Rapid Publ.
Volume 22, Number 1, 2026
Article Number 9
Number of page(s) 11
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/jeos/2026002
Published online 20 February 2026
  1. Kneubühl F, Diffraction grating spectroscopy, Appl. Opt. 8(3), 505–519 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.8.000505. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ronchi V, Forty years of history of a grating interferometer, Appl. Opt. 3, 437–451 (1964). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.3.000437. [Google Scholar]
  3. Martz DH, Nguyen HT, Patel D et al., Large area high efficiency broad bandwidth 800 nm dielectric gratings for high energy laser pulse compression, Opt. Express 17(26), 23809–23816 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.17.023809. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ahmed MA, Beirow F, Loescher A et al., High-power thin-disk lasers emitting beams with axially-symmetric polarizations, Nanophotonics 11, 835–846 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2021-0606. [Google Scholar]
  5. Peeters R, Lok S, Mallman J, et al., EUV lithography: NXE platform performance overview, Proc. SPIE 9048, Extreme Ultraviolet (EUV) Lithography V (2014). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2046909. [Google Scholar]
  6. Guoguang Y, Yibing S, Research on laser direct writing system and its lithography properties, SPIE Vol. 3550 (1998). [Google Scholar]
  7. Poleshchuk AG, Churin EG, Koronkevich VP, et al., Polar coordinate laser pattern generator for fabrication of diffractive optical elements with arbitrary structure, Appl. Opt. 38(8), 1295–1301 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.38.001295. [Google Scholar]
  8. Schattenburg M, Chen C, Everett P, Ferrera J, Konkola P, Smith H, Sub-100 nm metrology using interferometrically produced fiducials, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 17, 2692–2697 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1116/1.591047. [Google Scholar]
  9. Bienert F, Graf T, Ahmed MA, Comprehensive theoretical analysis of the period chirp in laser interference lithography, Appl. Opt. 61(9), 2313–2326 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.451873. [Google Scholar]
  10. Chen CG, Konkola PT, Heilmann RK, Joo C, Schattenburg ML, Nanometer-accurate Grating Fabrication with Scanning Beam Interference Lithography, Proc. SPIE 4936 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.469431. [Google Scholar]
  11. Chen C, Konkola P, Heilmann R, Pati G, Schattenburg M, Image metrology and system controls for scanning beam interference lithography, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 19, 2335–2341 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1116/1.1409379. [Google Scholar]
  12. Young P, Priambodo P, Maldonado T, Magnusson R, Simple interferometric fringe stabilization by CCD-based feedback control (Optical Society of America, 2005). https://doi.org/10.1364/FIO.2003.WJ6. [Google Scholar]
  13. Häfner M, Pruss C, Osten W, et al., Fabrication of rotational symmetric sub wavelength grating structures, DGaO Proceedings (2008). [Google Scholar]
  14. Lu S, Yang K, Zhu Y, Wang L, Zhanga M, Analysis and design of fringe phase control system for scanning beam interference lithography, Opt. Eng. 60(6), 064107 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.OE.60.6.064107. [Google Scholar]
  15. Chen CG, Heilmann RK, Joo C, Konkola PT, Pati GS, Schattenburg ML, Beam alignment for scanning beam interference lithography, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 20, 3071–3074 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.OE.60.6.064107. [Google Scholar]
  16. Chen X, Jiang S, Li Y, Jiang Y, Wang W, Bayanheshig, Fabrication of ultra-high aspect ratio silicon grating using an alignment method based on a scanning beam interference lithography system, Opt. Express 30, 40842–40853 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.469374. [Google Scholar]
  17. Li M, Xiang X, Zhou C, Wei C, Scan angle error measurement based on phase-stepping algorithms in scanning beam interference lithography, Appl. Opt. 58, 2641–2649 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.58.002641. [Google Scholar]
  18. Li Y, Jiang S, Chen X, Liu Z, Wang W, Song Y, Bayanheshig, Accurate measurement and adjustment method for interference fringe direction in a scanning beam interference lithography system, Opt. Express 31, 28145–28160 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.485488. [Google Scholar]
  19. Takeda M, Ina H, Kobayashi S, Fourier-transform method of fringe-pattern analysis for computer-based topography and interferometry, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 72, 156–160 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSA.72.000156. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Jäger G, Manske E, Hausotte T, Müller A, Balzer F, Nanopositioning and nanomeasuring machine NPMM-200 – a new powerful tool for large-range micro- and nanotechnology, Surf. Topogr.: Metrol. Prop. 4(3), 034004 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1088/2051-672X/4/3/034004. [Google Scholar]
  21. Schober C, Pruss C, Herkommer A, Osten W, The NPMM-200: large area high resolution for freeform surface measurement (Proc. SPIE, 2020). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2564918. [Google Scholar]
  22. Quadoa Optical CAD (2024). https://www.quadoa.com/index. [Google Scholar]
  23. Sony Semicon (2024), IMX250/264/253MZR/MYR Sensor Flyer. https://www.sony-semicon.com/files/62/flyer_industry/IMX250_264_253MZR_MYR_Flyer_en.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  24. Millerd JE, Brock NJ, Hayes JB, North-Morris MB, Novak M, Wyant JC, Pixelated Phase-Mask Dynamic Interferometer, Proc. SPIE 5531 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.560807. [Google Scholar]
  25. Rühle J, Treptow K, Schober C, et al., Polarization camera based fringe locking control of a writing head for scanning beam interference lithography, Proc. American Control Conference (ACC) (2025). https://doi.org/10.23919/ACC63710.2025.11107550. [Google Scholar]
  26. ITOM (2024). https://itom-project.github.io/documentation.html. [Google Scholar]
  27. Sedgwick P., Pearson’s correlation coefficient, BMJ 345, e4483 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e4483. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.