Open Access

This article has an erratum: [https://doi.org/10.1186/s41476-020-00142-7]


Issue
J. Eur. Opt. Soc.-Rapid Publ.
Volume 16, Number 1, 2020
Article Number 19
Number of page(s) 11
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/s41476-020-00140-9
Published online 03 August 2020
  1. Vogt, C., Deggendorf, D. E., Mazal, J., Lohner, R.-D.: The cause of structures on ground shapes. In: Proceedings of 3rd EOS Conference on Manufacturing of Optical Components 2013 (EOSMOC 2013). EOS Conferences at the World of Photonics Congress 2013 13 - 15 May 2013, International Congress Centre Munich (ICM), Germany. vol. 1, pp. 97. European Optical Society (EOS), Curran Associates, Inc, (2013) [Google Scholar]
  2. Braunecker B, Hentschel R, Tiziani HJ, Advanced Optics Using Aspherical Elements (2008) WashingtonSPIE PressISBN: 9780819467492 [Google Scholar]
  3. Aikens, D.M., DeGroote, J.E., Youngworth, R.N.: Specification and control of mid-spatial frequency wavefront errors in optical systems. In: Frontiers in Optics 2008/Laser Science XXIV/Plasmonics and Metamaterials/Optical Fabrication and Testing. Optical Society of America (2008). https://doi.org/10.1364/OFT.2008.OTuA1 [Google Scholar]
  4. Filhaber J, Mid-spatial-frequency errors: the hidden culprit of poor optical performance. Laser Focus World (2013) 49, 832–3+. [Google Scholar]
  5. Kim DW, Martin HM, Burge JH, Control of mid-spatial-frequency errors for large steep aspheric surfaces. OSA OF&T, Figuring and Finishing Science OM4D, June 24–28 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1364/OFT.2012.OM4D.1 [Google Scholar]
  6. Liao D, Yuan Z, Tang C, Xie R, Chen X, Mid-Spatial Frequency Error (PSD-2) of optics induced during CCOS and full-aperture polishing. J. Eur. Opt. Soc. Rapid Publ. (2013) 8, ISSN 1990-2573. https://doi.org/10.2971/jeos.2013.13031 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. DeGroote J, Light B, Savage B, Wiederhold B, Mandina M, VIBE™ finishing to remove mid-spatial frequency ripple (2010) OntarioOptical Society of America, Optimax Systems Inc.https://doi.org/10.1364/OFT.2010.OWE2 [Google Scholar]
  8. Tamkin JM, Dallas WJ, Milster TD, Theory of point-spread function artifacts due to structured mid-spatial frequency surface errors. Appl. Opt. (2010) 49, 254814–4824. https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.49.004814 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Yu G, Li H, Walker D, Removal of mid spatial-frequency features in mirror segments. J. Eur. Opt. Soc. Rapid Publ. (2011) 6, 11044. https://doi.org/10.2971/jeos.2011.11044 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Pohl M, Börret R, Simulation of mid-spatials from the grinding process. J. Eur. Opt. Soc. Rapid (2016) 11, 16010. https://doi.org/10.2971/jeos.2016.16010 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  11. Yu G, Reynolds C, Walker D, Faehnle O, Study of footprint variations of CCP considering machine kinematics. Eur. Phys. J. Conf. (2019) 215, 2405004. https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201921505004 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  12. Pohl M, Börret R, Kukso O, Rascher R, Simulation of MSF-errors using Fourier transform. Fifth European Seminar on Precision Optics Manufacturing (POM) (2018) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2317484 [Google Scholar]
  13. Pohl, M., Bielke, U., Börret, R., Kukso, O., Rascher, R.: Simulation of MSF-errors using Fourier transform. In: Optical Manufacturing and Testing XII, 09.18; 2018. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2320214 [Google Scholar]
  14. Pohl M, Bielke U, Börret R, Kukso O, Rascher R, MSF-Error Prevention Strategies for the Grinding Process, Sixth European Seminar on Precision Optics Manufacturing (POM) (2019) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2526581 [Google Scholar]
  15. Xiong GL, Yi JM, Zeng C, Guo HK, Li LX, Study of the gyroscopic effect of the spindle on the stability characteristics of the milling system. J. Mater. Process. Technol. (2003) 138, 1–3379–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(03)00102-X [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.