EDP Sciences logo
Submit your research paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 11 (2016) J. Eur. Opt. Soc.-Rapid Publ., 11 (2016) 16015 References
Open Access
Issue
J. Eur. Opt. Soc.-Rapid Publ.
Volume 11, 2016
Article Number 16015
Number of page(s) 6
DOI https://doi.org/10.2971/jeos.2016.16015
Published online 17 April 2016
  1. P. Huke, R. Klattenhoff, C. von Kopylow, and R. Bergmann “Novel trends in optical non-destructive testing methods,” J. Eur. Opt. Soc.-Rapid 8, (2013). [Google Scholar]
  2. M. Amann, T. Bosch, M. Lescure, R. Myllyla, and M. Rioux “Laser ranging: a critical review of usual techniques for distance measurement,” Opt. Eng. 40, 10–19 (2001). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. E. Pike “Lasers, photon statistics, photon-correlation spectroscopy and subsequent applications,” J. Eur. Opt. Soc.-Rapid 5, (2010). [Google Scholar]
  4. X. Su and Q. Zhang “Dynamic 3-D shape measurement method: a review,” Opt. Laser. Eng. 48, 191–204 (2010). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. A. Velten, T. Willwacher, O. Gupta, A. Veeraraghavan, M. G. Bawendi, and R. Raskar “Recovering three-dimensional shape around a corner using ultrafast time-of-flight imaging,” Nature communications 3, 745 (2012). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. P. Andersson “Long-range three-dimensional imaging using range-gated laser radar images,” Opt. Eng. 45, 034301 (2006). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. D. Monnin, A. L. Schneider, F. Christnacher, and Y. Lutz “A 3D Outdoor Scene Scanner Based on a Night-Vision Range-Gated Active Imaging System,” in Proceedings to Third International Symposium on 3D Data Processing, Visualization, and Transmission (3DPVT’06), 938–945 (IEEE, Chapel Hill, 2006). [Google Scholar]
  8. X.-W. Wang, Y. Zhou, S.-T. Fan, J. He, and Y.-L. Liu “Range-Gated Laser Stroboscopic Imaging for Night Remote Surveillance,” Chinese Phys. Lett. 27, 094203 (2010). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. J. Busck “Underwater 3-D optical imaging with a gated viewing laser radar,” Opt. Eng. 44, 116001 (2005). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. F. Caimi and F. Dalgleish “Performance considerations for continuous-wave and pulsed laser line scan (LLS) imaging systems,” J. Eur. Opt. Soc.-Rapid 5, (2010). [Google Scholar]
  11. X. Zhang and H. Yan “Three-dimensional active imaging with maximum depth range,” Appl. Optics 50, 1682–1686 (2011). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. X. Wang, Y. Li, and Y. Zhou “Triangular-range-intensity profile spatial-correlation method for 3D super-resolution range-gated imaging,” Appl. Optics 52, 7399–7406 (2013). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. R. Olsson, I. Eriksson, J. Powell, and A. Kaplan “Advances in pulsed laser weld monitoring by the statistical analysis of reflected light,” Opt. Laser. Eng. 49, 1352–1359 (2011). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Y. Zhao, A. MR, and X. Wang “Influence Factor Analysis for 3D Imaging Laser Radar Range Profile,” Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research 17, 142–147 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  15. S. Kruapech and J. Widjaja “Laser range finder using Gaussian beam range equation,” Opt. Laser Technol. 42, 749–754 (2010). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. R. Filter, T. Scharf, and H. P. Herzig “High resolution displacement detection with speckles: accuracy limits in linear displacement speckle metrology,” J. Eur. Opt. Soc.-Rapid 5, (2010). [Google Scholar]
  17. J. Wang, S. Zhao, G. Li, K. Yang, D. Li, J. An, and M. Li “Analysis of output characteristics of the actively Q-switched intracavity optical parametric oscillator considering Gaussian distribution of intracavity photon densities,” J. Mod. Opt. 55, 1267–1277 (2008). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. J. Alda “Laser and Gaussian beam propagation and transformation,” in Encyclopedia of optical engineering R. G. Driggers, C. Hoffman, and R. Driggers, eds., 999–1013 (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2003). [Google Scholar]
  19. W. Wagner, A. Ullrich, V. Ducic, T. Melzer, and N. Studnicka “Gaussian decomposition and calibration of a novel small-footprint fullwaveform digitising airborne laser scanner,” ISPRS J. Photogramm. 60, 100–112 (2006). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. C. Mallet and F. Bretar “Full-waveform topographic lidar: State-ofthe- art,” ISPRS J. Photogramm. 64, 1–16 (2009). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. A. Chauve, C. Mallet, F. Bretar, S. Durrieu, M. P. Deseilligny, and W. Puech “Processing full-waveform lidar data: modelling raw signals,” Int. Soc. Photogramme. 2007, 102–107 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  22. G. Tsagkatakis, A. Woiselle, G. Tzagkarakis, M. Bousquet, J.-L. Starck, and P. Tsakalides “Active range imaging via random gating,” Proc. SPIE 8542, 85420P–85420P (2012). [Google Scholar]
  23. R. L. Espinola, B. Teaney, Q. Nguyen, E. L. Jacobs, C. E. Halford, and D. H. Tofsted “Active imaging system performance model for target acquisition,” Proc. SPIE 6543, 65430T–65430T (2007) [Google Scholar]
  24. O. Steinvall, H. Olsson, G. Bolander, C. A. Groenwall, and D. Letalick “Gated viewing for target detection and target recognition,” Proc. SPIE 3707, 432–448 (1999). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. O. Steinvall, T. Chevalier, P. Andersson, and M. Elmqvist “Performance modeling and simulation of range-gated imaging systems,” Proc. SPIE 6542, 654218–654218 (2007). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. J. Busck and H. Heiselberg “Gated viewing and high-accuracy three-dimensional laser radar,” Appl. Optics 43, 4705–4710 (2004). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. L. Li, L. Wu, X. Wang, and E. Dang “Gated viewing laser imaging with compressive sensing,” Appl. Optics 51, 2706–2712 (2012). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.