EDP Sciences logo
Submit your research paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 4 (2009) J. Eur. Opt. Soc.-Rapid Publ., 4 (2009) 09002 References
Open Access
Issue
J. Eur. Opt. Soc.-Rapid Publ.
Volume 4, 2009
Article Number 09002
Number of page(s) 7
DOI https://doi.org/10.2971/jeos.2009.09002
Published online 15 January 2009
  1. J. Goodman, Statistical optics (Wiley, 1985). [Google Scholar]
  2. M. Pajuelo, G. Baldwin, H. Rabal, N. Cap, R. Arizaga, and M. Trivi, “Bio-speckle assessment of bruising in fruits” Opt. Laser. Eng. 40, 13–24 (2003). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. J. Garcia, Z. Zalevsky, P. Garcia-Martinez, C. Ferreira, M. Teicher, and Y. Beiderman, “Three-dimensional mapping and range measurement by means of projected speckle patterns” Appl. Optics. 47, 3032–3040 (2008). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. P. Lehmann, “Surface-roughness measurement based on the intensity correlation function of scattered light under speckle-pattern illumination” Appl. Optics. 38, 1144–1152 (1999). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. D. Lim, K. K. Chu, and J. Mertz, “Wide-field fluorescence sectioning with hybrid speckle and uniform-illumination microscopy” Opt. Lett. 33, 1819–1821 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  6. W. Wang, S. G. Hanson, and M. Takeda, “Complex amplitude correlations of dynamic laser speckle in complex ABCD optical systems” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A. 23, 2198–2207 (2006). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. E. N. Leith and J. Upatnieks, “Wavefront reconstruction with diffused illumination and three-dimensional objects” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 54, 1295 (1964). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. U. Schnars and W. Juptner, “Digital recording and numerical reconstruction of holograms” Meas. Sci. Technol. 13, R85–R101 (2002). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. G. Pedrini, S. Schedin, and H. J. Tiziani, “Aberration compensation in digital holographic reconstruction of microscopic objects” J. Mod. Optic. 48, 1035–1041 (2001). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. J. R. Fienup, “Phase retrieval algorithms: a comparison” Appl. Optics. 21, 2758–2769 (1982). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. S. Yang and H. Takajo, “Quantization error reduction in the measurement of Fourier intensity for phase retrieval” Jpn. J.Appl. Phys. 45, 1832–1835 (2006). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. M. R. Teague, “Deterministic phase retrieval: a Green’s function solution” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 73, 1434–1441 (1983). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. J. Goodman, Introduction to Fourier Optics (Roberts and Company, 2005). [Google Scholar]
  14. G. Pedrini, W. Osten, and Y. Zhang, “Wave-front reconstruction from a sequence of interferograms recorded at different planes” Opt. Lett. 30, 833–835 (2005). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. P. Almoro, G. Pedrini, and W. Osten, “Complete wavefront reconstruction using sequential intensity measurements of a volume speckle field” Appl. Optics. 45, 8596–8605 (2006). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. P. Almoro, G. Pedrini, and W. Osten, “Aperture synthesis in phase retrieval using a volume-speckle field” Opt. Lett. 32, 733–735 (2007). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. A. Anand, G. Pedrini, W. Osten, and P. Almoro, “Wavefront sensing with random amplitude mask and phase retrieval” Opt. Lett. 32, 1584–1586 (2007). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. P. F. Almoro and S. G. Hanson, “Random phase plate for wavefront sensing via phase retrieval and a volume speckle field” Appl. Optics. 47, 2979–2987 (2008). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. P. F. Almoro, P. N. Gundu, and S. G. Hanson, “Numerical correction of aberrations via phase retrieval with speckle illumination.” in preparation, (2009). [Google Scholar]
  20. P. F. Almoro and S. G. Hanson, “Wavefront sensing using speckles with fringe compensation” Opt. Express 16, 7608–7618 (2008). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. P. F. Almoro, G. Pedrini, A. Anand, W. Osten, and S. G. Hanson, “Interferometric evaluation of angular displacements using phase retrieval” Opt. Lett. 33, 2041–2043 (2008). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. P. F. Almoro, G. Pedrini, A. Anand, W. Osten, and S.G. Hanson, “Angular displacement and deformation analyses using a speckle-based wavefront sensor” in preparation, (2009). [Google Scholar]
  23. S. van Haver, J.J.M. Braat, P. Dirksen, A.J.E.M. Janssen, “High-NA aberration retrieval with the extended Nijboer-Zernike vector diffraction theory” J. Europ. Opt. Soc. Rap. Public. 1, 06004 (2006). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. C. Saloma, S. Kawata, and S. Minami, “A laser diode microscope that generates weakly speckled images” Opt. Lett. 15, 203–205 (1990). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.