Open Access
Issue
J. Eur. Opt. Soc.-Rapid Publ.
Volume 3, 2008
Article Number 08012
Number of page(s) 6
DOI https://doi.org/10.2971/jeos.2008.08012
Published online 18 March 2008
  1. A. Márquez, S. Gallego, D. Méndez, M. L. Álvarez, E. Fernández, M. Ortuño, C. Neipp, A. Beléndez and I. Pascual, “Accurate control of a liquid crystal display to produce a homogenized Fourier transform for holographic memories” Opt. Lett. 32, 2511–2513 (2007). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. R. Tudela, E. Martín-Badosa, I. Labastida, S. Vallmitjana, I. Juvells and A. Carnicer, “Full complex Fresnel holograms displayed on liquid crystal devices” J. Opt. A: Pure Appl. Opt. 5, S189–S194 (2003). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. W. Osten, C. Kohler and J. Liesener, “Evaluation and application of spatial light modulators for optical metrology” Opt. Pura Apl. 38, 71–81 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  4. A. Márquez, C. Iemmi, I. Moreno, J. A. Davis, J. Campos and M. J. Yzuel, “Quantitative prediction of the modulation behavior of twisted nematic liquid crystal displays based on a simple physical model” Opt. Eng. 40, 2558–2564 (2001). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. J. Nicolás, J. Campos and M. J. Yzuel, “Phase and amplitude modulation of elliptic polarization states by nonabsorbing anisotropic elements: application to liquid-crystal devices” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 19, 1013–1020 (2002). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. S. T. Wu and D. K. Yang, Reflective Liquid Crystal Displays (John Wiley & Sons Inc., Chichester, 2005). [Google Scholar]
  7. H. Dai, K. Xu, Y. Liu, X. Wang and J. Liu, “Characteristics of LCoS Phase-only spatial light modulator and its applications” Opt. Commun. 238, 269–276 (2004). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. T. Ito, T. Shimobaba, H. Godo and M. Horiuchi, “Holographic reconstruction with a 10-µm pixel-pitch reflective liquid-crystal display by use of a light-emitting diode reference light” Opt. Lett. 27, 1406–1408 (2002). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. J. Kacperski and M. Kujawinska, “Active, LCoS based laser interferometer for microelements studies” Opt. Express 14, 9664–9678 (2006). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. J. E. Wolfe and R. A. Chipman, “Polarimetric characterization of liquid-crystal-on-silicon panels” Appl. Optics 45, 1688–1703 (2006). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. A. Márquez, I. Moreno, C. Iemmi, A. Lizana, J. Campos and M. J. Yzuel, “Mueller-Stokes characterization and optimization of a liquid crystal on silicon display showing depolarization” Opt. Express (in press). [Google Scholar]
  12. A. Hermerschmidt, S. Osten, S. Krüger and Thomas Blümel, “Wavefront generation using a phase-only modulating liquid-crystalbased micro-display with HDTV resolution” Proc. of SPIE 6584, 65840E (2007). [Google Scholar]
  13. A. Márquez, C. Iemmi, J. Campos and M. J. Yzuel, “Achromatic diffractive lens written onto a liquid crystal display” Opt. Lett. 31, 392–394 (2006). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. A. Márquez, C. Iemmi, J. Campos, J. C. Escalera and M. J. Yzuel, “Programmable apodizer to compensate chromatic aberrations effects using a liquid crystal spatial light modulator” Opt. Express 13, 716–730 (2005). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. D. Goldstein, Polarized Light (Marcel Dekker, 2004). [Google Scholar]
  16. S. Stallinga, “Equivalent retarder approach to reflective liquid crystal displays” J. Appl. Phys. 86, 4756–4766 (1999) [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. A. Márquez, I. Moreno, J. Campos and M. J. Yzuel, “Analysis of Fabry-Perot interference effects on the modulation properties of liquid crystal displays” Opt. Commun. 265, 84–94 (2006). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. S. Y. Lu and R. A. Chipman, “Interpretation of Mueller matrices based on polar decomposition” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 13, 1106–1113 (1996). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.