Issue 
J. Eur. Opt. SocietyRapid Publ.
Volume 20, Number 1, 2024
Plasmonica



Article Number  11  
Number of page(s)  7  
DOI  https://doi.org/10.1051/jeos/2024009  
Published online  16 April 2024 
Research Article
Tailoring second harmonic emission by ZnO nanostructures: Enhancement of directionality
Sapienza University of Rome, SBAI Department, Rome 00161, Italy
^{*} Corresponding author: emilija.petronijevic@uniroma1.it
Received:
28
December
2023
Accepted:
28
February
2024
Tailoring nonlinear optical properties at the nanoscale is a hot topic in nowadays nanophotonics, promising for applications spanning from sensing to ultrafast optical communications. Here we present a numerical approach of designing a simple semiconductor nanostructure able to tailor second harmonic emission in the near and farfield. We start from linear simulations of ZnO nanospheres, which reveal multipolar nature of the scattering. Next, we show how the same nanospheres, with radii in 30–130 nm range, excited at 800 nm, manipulate the directivity of the emitted second harmonic. We observe that the nanospheres which exhibit Kerker condition at 400 nm, emit the second harmonic field in the forward direction. We further investigate how the asymmetry (ellipsoid geometry) tailors the second harmonic directivity. We finally introduce geometry with low chirooptical response, and observe that the second harmonic farfield depends on the handedness of the light exciting the nanostructure at 800 nm.
Key words: Nanostructures / Nanophotonics / Nonlinear / Electromagnetic simulations
© The Author(s), published by EDP Sciences, 2024
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
1 Introduction
Dielectric and semiconductor nanostructures in low refractive index media support both electric and magnetic resonances, thus controlling the scattered field directionality and intensity [1]. Their low ohmic losses in the nearinfrared and visible light spectra offer advantages in novel nanophotonic components, aiming at applications in biosensing, emission control, and alloptical manipulation [2–4]. Furthermore, exploring nonlinear properties of alldielectric nanostructured media offers unique possibilities to enhance harmonic generation and tailor its radiation pattern [4–7].
ZnO is a wide direct bandgap semiconductor already widely applied in industry. With the progress of nanotechnology, micro and nanostructuring of ZnO showed promise in efficient roomtemperature nanophotonic devices based on microcavities [8] and nanowires [9]. Moreover, ZnO is noncentrosymmetric, offering efficient nonlinear optical properties at visible frequencies [10, 11]. Combining welldeveloped colloidal manufacturing of ZnO [12] with electromagnetic tailoring of its nonlinear properties could open fertile field in colloidal nonlinear nanophotonics.
In this numerical work, we investigate linear and nonlinear optical properties of various single ZnO nanostructures, immersed in water. We perform simulations of multipole decomposition and investigate how the supported modes tailor the second harmonic response. Starting from the nanosphere geometry, we further introduce the asymmetry, and, finally, low chirooptical response, showing that the farfield second harmonic distribution strongly depends on the nanoparticle shape and the incident polarization.
2 Results and discussion
We perform fullwave 3D simulations based on the finitedifferencetimedomain (FDTD) method in Lumerical [13]. First, a single nanosphere of radius r is considered for linear scattering in water (FDTD medium refractive index is set to 1.33); complex refractive index of ZnO is taken from ref. [14]. FDTD region is defined by perfectly matched layers (PMLs) in all directions, and the nanosphere is excited by a linearly polarized totalfieldscatteredfield (TFSF) source from the top (negative zdirection, normal incidence). Total scattering crosssection in the 300–1000 nm range is resolved into electric dipole (ED), magnetic dipole (MD), electric quadrupole (EQ) and magnetic quadrupole (MQ) by means of MENP, an opensource MATLABbased solver for multipole expansion [15]. In Figure 1 we plot such decomposition for nanospheres with radiuses from 30 nm to 130 nm (with 20 nm step). While MENP method is in principle not restricted to this radii range, we chose it to bring the ZnO resonances in the visible range which is of interest for the future experimental work in our laboratory (e.g. excitation at 800 nm, and second harmonic measurements at 400 nm). Each panel in Figure 1 is normalized by the maximum total scattering σ_{sc,max}, while the scattering efficiency η is defined as σ_{sc,max} normalized to geometric crosssection of the respective nanosphere. As expected, increasing the nanosphere radius red shifts the spectra and increases σ_{sc,max}, leading to a peak around 400 nm. For radiuses r = 30 – 50 nm, the ED mode is largely responsible for the scattering, while from r = 70 nm, other modes have nonnegligible contribution. From r = 90 nm, the leading mode at 400 nm is MD mode, having its peak in this range. Interestingly, for r = 90 nm, ED and MD overlap around 400 nm, offering the possibility for the first Kerker condition and suppression of backward scattering [2, 16]. We note that the spectral position of the scattering resonances agrees well with the previous experimental results on ZnO nanospheres [17, 18]: in these works, photoacoustic spectroscopy was applied to measure photothermal response of the sample and extract both absorption and scattering coefficientsy.
Figure 1 Multipole decomposition in ZnO nanospheres as a function of radius r; each panel is normalized to the maximum of the total scattering, indicated by σ_{sc,max}, while the scattering efficiency η indicates this maximum, normalized to the geometric crosssection. 
We next investigate the second harmonic farfield distribution if the nanosphere were excited at 800 nm, as in the experimental setup which we used in previous works treating materials synthetized from [19] or containing ZnO [11]. These simulations are performed using a narrow band 800 nm excitation, with the FDTD continuous wave normalization switched off, to remove the excitation pulse influence on the collection of the results at 400 nm. As we are interested in studying the nanostructure shape influence on the farfield pattern, we approximate the ZnO nonlinearities with a nondispersive, isotropic material having χ ^{(2)} = 7.5 pm/V [20]; this material is a userdefined “chi2” material model in Lumerical, which takes the linear optical properties from already defined ZnO complex refractive index, and adds the nonlinearity by importing a nonzero χ ^{(2)}. We underline that this is an approximation which takes into account the shape influences on the second order response, and not the ZnO anisotropy, while highly crystalline ZnO nanoparticles have anisotropic χ ^{(2)} tensor (i.e. caxis grown ZnO has five nonvanishing tensor elements). In Lumerical, it is currently easy to implement the extension of this method to materials with diagonal anisotropy. To excite the second harmonic response, we increase the excitation beam amplitude (TFSF source at 800 nm) to 10^{10} eV/m. The scattered field distribution is monitored by six monitors surrounding the TFSF source; the global monitor properties are set to override the source limits and detect fields at 400 nm instead.
Exciting the different nanospheres at 800 nm, we calculate nearfields in the xzplane, and farfield distributions in the xy and xz planes, emitted by the nanosphere at 400 nm. The nanosphere is excited from the top, and the XZ farfield plane shows fields scattered in the forward and backward directions; the XY farfield plane shows laterally scattered fields, as seen in the inset of Figure 2; this inset also shows the spectrum of a time monitor, clearly showing the excitation spectrum and the nonlinear response generation. We examine dimensions around the Kerker condition; the strongest scattering is in the forward direction, hence we normalize each polar plot with its maximum scattering intensity in the forward direction. From XZ farfield results, we also extract the forwardtobackward ratio, (F/B). For r = 70 nm, there is a strong contribution of ED, and the inplane scattering is nonnegligible, Figure 2a; F/B is 10.2. Increasing the radius to overlap ED and MD, F/B increases to 83.8, and the lateral scattering is much lower, Figure 2b. Finally, at the large radius of r = 110 nm, there is a strong forward and negligible lateral emission, Figure 2c, while F/B ratio drops to 34.7. These results show that even a simple nanosphere radius choice tailors the second harmonic field directivity in relation to the modes supported at this wavelength. While the directivity and F/B ratio depend on the nanosphere radius, the total scattered field at 400 nm is the highest for r = 110 nm in the forward direction of the XZ plane. Compared to this nanosphere, nanospheres with r = 90 nm and r = 70 nm scatter 28% and 5% in the forward direction, respectively.
Figure 2 Second harmonic farfield radiation pattern in XY (blue) and XZ (red) planes, calculated for a nanosphere with radius (a) r = 70 nm, (b) r = 90 nm, and (c) r = 110 nm; each polar plot is normalized to the maximum forward (XZ) scattering. Below each polar plot, we show forward to backward (F/B) ratio, followed by the nearfield distribution of electric field intensity at 400 nm, plotted in the xzplane. Inset shows planes of the scattering geometry, the spectrum response result from a time monitor, and the electric field intensity color scale (equal for all nanospheres). 
2.1 Influence of asymmetry
We next investigate how ellipsoid geometry influences radiated second harmonic fields. We define the ellipsoid with three radi (r_{ x,y,z }), one of which is set to 200 nm, while the other two are set to 50 nm. The electric field is always linearly polarized in the xdirection, as in the inset of Figure 3. Figure 3a plots the ellipsoid oriented along xdirection (r_{ x } = 200 nm); as expected, the strong ED governs the scattering. When electric field is polarized along shorter axis in the xyplane, the multipolar analysis gives completely different response, with lower total scattering, Figure 3b. Finally, when long axis of the ellipsoid is parallel to the light propagation, ED and MQ have peaks close to 400 nm, Figure 3c. We next plot the XY and XZ second harmonic farfield distribution for the previous configurations, Figure 3d. xoriented ellipsoid (long axis oriented in the xdirection) strongly emits in both XY and XZ directions; all polar plots are normalized to its maximum forward emission. yoriented ellipsoid is the least efficient, while zoriented ellipsoid has negligible backward scattering; these two ellipsoids have negligible lateral emission compared to the xoriented one. In Figure 3e, we calculate the average XY and XZ emitted second harmonic for the three orientations. There is nonnegligible backward and lateral scattering, but the overall farfield response is led by the behavior of the xoriented ellipsoid. Understanding the contribution of each orientation to the total scattered field in both linear and nonlinear regime is important if elongated ZnO nanostructures are randomly dispersed in a solution [21].
Figure 3 (a)–(c) Multipole decomposition in ZnO nanoellipsoids as a function of direction: (a) r_{ x } = 200 nm, r_{ y } = r_{ z } = 50 nm, (b) r_{ y } = 200 nm, r_{ x } = r_{ z } = 50 nm, (c) r_{ z } = 200 nm, r_{ x } = r_{ y } = 50 nm. (d) XY and XZ scattering planes of the second harmonic for previous cases; blue, red, and green color define the long axis of the ellipsoid in the x, y and zdirection, respectively. All polar plots are normalized to the maximum forward scattering of the xoriented ellipsoid. (e) Second harmonic emitted in XY and XZ direction, averaged over the three orientations, and normalized to the maximum scattering in the forward direction. 
2.2 Influence of chirality
Chirality is a fundamental property of our world; at the nanoscale, chiral objects differently interact with left and right circular polarizations (LCP and RCP, respectively). In nanostructured media, this property tailors linear [22–27] and nonlinear [28–30] optical response, leading to remarkable results towards applications in medicine and pharmaceuticals [31, 32]. We therefore investigate how transitioning to chiral shape changes the farfield distribution patter, and weather this pattern is able to “sense” chirality. We combine two TFSF sources so that they have polarizations perpendicular to each other, with a phase offset of +90° or −90°, while having all the other properties equal; in the yoriented source, +90° (−90°) corresponds to RCP (LCP) incident polarization. A single helix is defined by material diameter d, helix pitch p, number of turns N, and loop radius r (calculated from the center to the middle of the material. We treat vertically aligned helix, important in many experimental configurations [33–35].
We first investigate how the number of turns influences lateral and forward scattering, Figure 4; constant geometric parameters are p = 200 nm, r = 50 nm, and d = 100 nm, and each polar plot is normalized to its own maximum forward scattering. When the helix does not have a complete turn, i.e. for N = 0.5, difference in the multipolar decomposition is extremely low between RCP and LCP excitations. MD emerges as the only mode with visible difference, and it is stronger for RCP excitation, Figure 4a. At 400 nm, this helix has strong lateral scattering, but, being the Kerker condition close to 400 nm, it has no backward scattering. For N = 1, in Figure 4b, difference for LCP and RCP excitation can be appreciated, especially for mode MD. Therefore, in polar plots at 400 nm, we observe difference in forward scattering, which is stronger for RCP excitation at 800 nm. As the number of turns increases, lateral scattering becomes negligible. Figure 4c shows that MD mode peak red shifts towards 500 nm for N = 1.5, but it still has different scattering efficiency between LCP and RCP at 400 nm. This mode then leads to observed chirality in the forward scattering at 400 nm. This is also confirmed by calculating the nonlinear scattered field dissymmetry factors at second harmonic: g_{SH} = 2 · (I_{RCP,SH} − I_{LCP,SH})/(I_{RCP,SH} + I_{LCP,SH}), where I_{RCP,SH} and I_{LCP,SH} stand for scattered second harmonic intensity for RCP and LCP excitation, respectively; bottom panels of Figure 4 show g_{SH} as a function of polar angle φ.
Figure 4 Multipole decomposition, second harmonic farfield distribution and nonlinear dissymmetry factor as a function of number of turns of a nanohelix. The inset shows the helix geometry, with linear and nonlinear results for (a) N = 0.5, (b) N = 1, and (c) N = 1.5. Geometric parameters of each helix are p = 200 nm, d = 100 nm, and r = 50 nm. All polar plots are normalized to the maximum forward scattering for RCP excitation. 
We next investigate how the scattering efficiency depends on the loop radius, and how it influences radiation patterns at 400 nm. We keep the following parameters constant: p = 200 nm, N = 1, d = 100 nm, and we change the loop radius r. In Figure 4a–4c we plot the scattering efficiencies, as normalized to the geometric crosssection (r + d/2)^{2} π. For r = 20 nm, the nanostructure has the shape almost as a rod, and linear multipole decomposition gives extremely low chirality, Figure 5a. Widening the loop to r = 60 nm, MD mode peaks around 400 nm, and it has different scattering efficiency for RCP and LCP excitations, Figure 5b. This difference remains for r = 100 nm, with the overall scattering efficiency increase, Figure 5c. In Figure 5d we plot the radiation patterns at 400 nm, in XY plane (left) and XZ plane (right); we normalize all graphs to the maximum forward scattering for the most efficient helix, i.e. the one with r = 100 nm. Interestingly, this helix has many modes supported at 400 nm, and it provides strong laterally emitted second harmonic at this wavelength. In all planes, all helices respond better to RCP incident polarization, and provide lateral scattering comparable to the forward scattering. Accordingly, near field generated around the helices depend on the excitation handedness, as shown in Figure 5e for r = 100 nm. Therefore, chirality tailors near fields and the farfield directivity at second harmonic wavelengths.
Figure 5 Multipole decomposition and second harmonic farfield distribution as a function of nanohelix loop radius; other geometric parameters of each helix are p = 200 nm, d = 100 nm, and N = 1, and multipole decomposition is done for (a) r = 20 nm, (b) r = 60 nm, and (c) r = 100 nm. (d) XY (left) and XZ (right) farfield distributions at 400 nm, for LCP and RCP excitations, and r = 20 nm (blue), r = 60 nm (green), and r = 100 nm (red). All polar plots are normalized to the maximum forward scattering for r = 100 nm and RCP excitation. (e) Electric field intensity at 400 nm in the xzplane, when r = 100 nm nanohelix is excited from the top, at 800 nm, with RCP (left) and LCP (right). 
As nanohelices, too, are usually randomly oriented in a liquid, for a complete simulation of chirality, the orientational averaging must be performed, as experimentally shown in reference [36]; this procedure is the subject of future work. Apart from nanohelix geometry [37], a very recent work showed efficient linear chiral response in ZnO crystals synthesized using chiral methionine molecules as symmetrybreaking agents [38]: with chiral response peaking in the blue spectral range, chiral ZnO nanocrystals showed promise for improving surface reactions in photocatalysis. We believe it would be interesting to optimize geometries of such structures according to our simulations, and to measure their nonlinear response. Another interesting field are the cooperative effects in coupled nanostructures; i.e. chiral metamaterials were fabricated from different materials as vertically standing ensembles on substrates [22, 33]. In these cases, the total circular dichroism in the linear range was shown to reach remarkable values as there is no orientational averaging. Therefore, one could study how chirality at fundamental and second harmonic wavelengths tune the chirality at the emitted second harmonic. Moreover, chirality at the nanoscale can be treated even in achiral samples, where specific modes can lead to enhanced nearfield chirality and socalled factor C [2, 39–42]. We predict that the discovered Kerker effect at the second harmonic wavelength can be further combined with the calculations of nearfield chirality in solutions of chiral molecules coupled with achiral nanoparticles.
3 Conclusions
We have studied linear and nonlinear optical properties of nanostructures in water by means of FDTD simulations. Starting from the multipole decomposition in semiconductor nanospheres, we have introduced the nonlinear susceptibility. We then excited the nanostructures with strong electric field at 800 nm, and studied near and farfield distributions emitted at second harmonic wavelength. For ZnO as a test material, nanosphere that supports the first Kerker condition around 400 nm leads to negligible backward scattering of the second harmonic. We further introduced asymmetry and chirality in the nanostructure geometry, and monitored its influence and the second harmonic farfield directivity and dependence on the polarization. We believe that our numerical approach could be a valuable tool for prediction and tailoring of farfield radiation pattern in nonlinear nanophotonics.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the ENSEMBLE3 Project carried within the Teaming for Excellence Horizon 2020 program of the European Commission (GA No. 857543), and the International Research Agendas Program (MAB/2020/14) of the Foundation for Polish Science cofinanced by the European Union under the European Regional Development Fund and Teaming Horizon 2020 program of the European Commission.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Data availability statement
Data obtained in this work are not publicly available at this time but may be obtained from the authors upon reasonable request.
Author contribution statement
Conceptualization, E.P.; methodology, E.P. and C.S.; software, E.P. and C.S.; validation, writing – original draft preparation, E.P.; writing – review and editing, C.S.
References
 Xu J., Wu Y., Zhang P., Wu Y., Vallée R.A.L., Wu S., Liu X. (2021) Resonant scattering manipulation of dielectric nanoparticles, Adv. Opt. Mater. 9, 2100112. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Solomon M.L., Abendroth J.M., Poulikakos L.V., Hu J., Dionne J.A. (2020) Fluorescencedetected circular dichroism of a chiral molecular monolayer with dielectric metasurfaces, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 43, 18304–18309. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Kalinic B., Cesca T., Balasa I.G., Trevisani M., Jacassi A., Maier S.A., Sapienza R., Mattei G. (2023) QuasiBIC modes in alldielectric slotted nanoantennas for enhanced Er^{3+} emission, ACS Photonics 10, 2, 534–543. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
 Shcherbakov M.R., Vabishchevich P.P., Shorokhov A.S., Chong K.E., Choi D., Staude I., Miroshnichenko A.E., Neshev D.N., Fedyanin A.A., Kivshar Y.S. (2015) Ultrafast alloptical switching with magnetic resonances in nonlinear dielectric nanostructures, Nano Lett. 15, 6985–6990. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Carletti L., Locatelli A., Neshev D., De Angelis C. (2016) Shaping the radiation pattern of secondharmonic generation from algaas dielectric nanoantennas, ACS Photonics 3, 8, 1500–1507. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Bahng J.H., Jahani S., Montjoy D.G., Yao T., Kotov N., Marandi A. (2020) Mie resonance engineering in metashell supraparticles for nanoscale nonlinear optics, ACS Nano 14, 17203–17212. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Carletti L., Zilli A., Moia F., Toma A., Finazzi M., De Angelis C., Neshev D.N., Celebrano M. (2021) Steering and encoding the polarization of the second harmonic in the visible with a monolithic LiNbO_{3} metasurface, ACS Photonics 8, 731–737. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
 Lai Y.Y., Lan Y.P., Lu T.C. (2013) Strong light–matter interaction in ZnO microcavities, Light Sci. Appl. 2, e76. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Li H., Tang J., Lin F., Wang D., Fang D., Fang X., Liu W., Chen R., Wei Z. (2019) Improved optical property and lasing of ZnO nanowires by Ar plasma treatment, Nanoscale Res. Lett. 14, 312. [Google Scholar]
 Larciprete M.C., Centini M. (2015) Second harmonic generation from ZnO films and nanostructures, Appl. Phys. Rev. 2, 031302. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Petronijevic E., Tomczyk M., Belardini A., Osewski P., Piotrowski P., Centini M., Leahu G., Li Voti R., Pawlak D.A., Sibilia C., Larciprete M.C. (2022) Surprising eutectics: enhanced properties of ZnO–ZnWO_{4} from visible to MIR, Adv. Mater. 35, 34, 2206005. [Google Scholar]
 van Embden J., Gross S., Kittilstved K.R., Della Gaspera E. (2023) Colloidal approaches to zinc oxide nanocrystals, Chem. Rev. 123, 1, 271–326. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Lumerical Solutions, Inc. Available at: http://www.lumerical.com/tcadproducts/fdtd/. [Google Scholar]
 Aguilar O., de Castro S., Godoy M.P.F., Dias M.R.S. (2019) Optoelectronic characterization of Zn_{1−x}Cd_{x}O thin films as an alternative to photonic crystals in organic solar cells, Opt. Mater. Express 9, 3638–3648. [Google Scholar]
 Hinamoto T., Fujii M. (2021) MENP: An opensource MATLAB implementation of multipole expansion for nanophotonics, OSA Contin. 4, 5, 1640–1648. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Luk’yanchuk B.S., Voshchinnikov N.V., PaniaguaDomínguez R., Kuznetsov A.I. (2015) Optimum forward light scattering by spherical and spheroidal dielectric nanoparticles with high refractive index, ACS Photonics 2, 7, 993–999. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Lamastra F.R., Grilli M.L., Leahu G., Belardini A., Li Voti R., Sibilia C., Salvatori D., Cacciotti I., Nanni F. (2017) Diatom frustules decorated with zinc oxide nanoparticles for enhanced optical properties, Nanotechnology 28, 375704. [Google Scholar]
 Lamastra F.R., Grilli M.L., Leahu G., Belardini A., Li Voti R., Sibilia C., Salvatori D., Cacciotti I., Nanni F. (2018) Photoacoustic spectroscopy investigation of zinc oxide/diatom frustules hybrid powders, Int. J. Thermophys. 39, 110. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Osewski P., Belardini A., Petronijevic E., Centini M., Leahu G., Diduszko R., Pawlak D.A., Sibilia C. (2017) Selfphasematched secondharmonic and whitelight generation in a biaxial zinc tungstate single crystal, Sci. Rep. 7, 45247. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Das S.K., Bock M., O’Neill C., Grunwald R., Lee K.M., Lee H.W., Lee S., Rotermund F. (2008) Efficient second harmonic generation in ZnO nanorod arrays with broadband ultrashort pulses, Appl. Phys. Lett. 93, 181112. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Lee W., Yeop J., Heo J., Jin Yoon Y., Yi Park S., Jeong J., Seop Shin Y., Won Kim J., Gyeong An N., Suk Kim D., Park J., Young Kim J. (2020) High colloidal stability ZnO nanoparticles independent on solvent polarity and their application in polymer solar cells, Sci. Rep. 10, 18055. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Kilic U., Hilfiker M., Ruder A., Feder R., Schubert E., Schubert M., Argyropoulos C. (2021) Broadband enhanced chirality with tunable response in hybrid plasmonic helical metamaterials, Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, 2010329. [Google Scholar]
 GonzálezRubio G., Mosquera J., Kumar V., PedrazoTardajos A., Llombart P., Solís D.M., Lobato I., Noya E.G., GuerreroMartínez A., Taboada J.M., Obelleiro F., MacDowell L.G., Bals S., LizMarzán L.M. (2020) Micelledirected chiral seeded growth on anisotropic gold nanocrystals, Science 368, 1472–1477. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Zhuo X., Mychinko M., Heyvaert W., Larios D., ObelleiroLiz M., Taboada J.M., Bals S., LizMarzán L.M. (2022) Morphological and optical transitions during micelleseeded chiral growth on gold nanorods, ACS Nano 16, 19281–19292. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Leahu G., Petronijevic E., Li Voti R., Belardini A., Cesca T., Mattei G., Sibilia C. (2021) Diffracted beams from metasurfaces: high chiral detectivity by photothermal deflection technique, Adv. Opt. Mater. 9, 21, 2100670. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Petronijevic E., Belardini A., Cesca T., Scian C., Mattei G., Sibilia C. (2021) Rich nearinfrared chiral behavior in diffractive metasurfaces, Phys. Rev. Appl. 16, 1, 014003. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Ali H., Petronijevic E., Pellegrini G., Sibilia C., Andreani L.C. (2023) Circular dichroism in a plasmonic array of elliptical nanoholes with square lattice, Opt. Express 31, 9, 14196–14211. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Collins J.T., Rusimova K.R., Hooper D.C., Jeong H.H., Ohnoutek L., PradeuxCaggiano F., Verbiest T., Carberry D.R., Fisher P., Valev V.K. (2019) First observation of optical activity in hyperRayleigh scattering, Phys. Rev. X 9, 1, 011024. [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
 Ohnoutek L., Kim J.Y., Lu J., Olohan B.J., Răsădean D.M., Pantoş G.D., Kotov N.A., Valev V.K. (2022) Third harmonic hypermie scattering from semiconductor nanohelices, Nat. Photon. 16, 126–133. [Google Scholar]
 Ohnoutek L., Jeong H.H., Jones R.R., Sachs J., Olohan B.J., Răsădean D.M., Pantoş G.D., Andrews D.L., Valev V.K. (2021) Optical activity in thirdharmonic Rayleigh scattering: a new route for measuring chirality, Laser Photonic Rev. 15, 11, 2100235. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Hou K., Zhao J., Wang H., Li B., Li K., Shi X., Wan K., Ai J., Lv J., Wang D., Huang Q., Wang H., Cao Q., Liu S., Tang Z. (2020) Chiral gold nanoparticles enantioselectively rescue memory deficits in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease, Nat. Commun. 11, 4790. [Google Scholar]
 Xu L., Wang X., Wang W., Sun M., Choi W.J., Kim J.Y., Hao C., Li S., Qu A., Lu M., Wu X. (2022) Enantiomerdependent immunological response to chiral nanoparticles, Nature 601, 366–373. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Passaseo A., Esposito M., Cuscunà M., Tasco V. (2017) Materials and 3D designs of helix nanostructures for chirality at optical frequencies, Adv. Opt. Mater. 5, 1601079. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Petronijevic E., Belardini A., Leahu G., Li Voti R., Sibilia C. (2022) Nanostructured materials for circular dichroism and chirality at the nanoscale: towards unconventional characterization [Invited], Opt. Mater. Express 12, 7, 2426–2937. [Google Scholar]
 Jones R.R., Miksch C., Kwon H., Pothoven C., Rusimova K.R., Kamp M., Gong K., Zhang L., Batten T., Smith B., Silhanek A.V., Fischer P., Wolverson D., Valev V.K. (2023) Dense arrays of nanohelices: Raman scattering from achiral molecules reveals the nearfield enhancements at chiral metasurfaces, Adv. Mater. 35, 2209282. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Sachs J., Günther J., Mark A.G., Fischer P. (2020) Chiroptical spectroscopy of a freely diffusing single nanoparticle, Nat. Commun. 11, 4513. [Google Scholar]
 Gao P.X., Ding Y., Mai W., Hughes W.L., Lao C., Wang Z.L. (2005) Conversion of zinc oxide nanobelts into superlatticestructured nanohelices, Science 309, 5741. [Google Scholar]
 Ai M., Pan L., Shi C., Huang Z.F., Zhang X., Mi W., Zou J.J. (2023) Spin selection in atomiclevel chiral metal oxide for photocatalysis, Nat. Commun. 14, 4562. [Google Scholar]
 Petronijevic E., Sibilia C. (2019) Enhanced nearfield chirality in periodic arrays of Si nanowires for chiral sensing, Molecules 24, 5, 853. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Petronijevic E., Sandoval E.M., Ramezani M., OrdóňezRomero C.L., Noguez C., Bovino F.A., Sibilia C., Pirruccio G. (2019) Extended chirooptical nearfield response of achiral plasmonic lattices, J. Phys. Chem. C 123, 38, 23620–23627. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Ye L., Li J., Richter F.U., Jahani Y., Lu R., Lee B.R., Tseng M.L., Altug H. (2023) Dielectric tetramer nanoresonators supporting strong superchiral fields for vibrational circular dichroism spectroscopy, ACS Photonics 10, 12, 4377–4384. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Goerlitzer E.S.A., ZapataHerrera M., Ponomareva E., Feller D., GarciaEtxarri A., Karg M., Aizpurua J., Vogel N. (2023) Molecularinduced chirality transfer to plasmonic lattice modes, ACS Photonics 10, 6, 1821–1831. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
All Figures
Figure 1 Multipole decomposition in ZnO nanospheres as a function of radius r; each panel is normalized to the maximum of the total scattering, indicated by σ_{sc,max}, while the scattering efficiency η indicates this maximum, normalized to the geometric crosssection. 

In the text 
Figure 2 Second harmonic farfield radiation pattern in XY (blue) and XZ (red) planes, calculated for a nanosphere with radius (a) r = 70 nm, (b) r = 90 nm, and (c) r = 110 nm; each polar plot is normalized to the maximum forward (XZ) scattering. Below each polar plot, we show forward to backward (F/B) ratio, followed by the nearfield distribution of electric field intensity at 400 nm, plotted in the xzplane. Inset shows planes of the scattering geometry, the spectrum response result from a time monitor, and the electric field intensity color scale (equal for all nanospheres). 

In the text 
Figure 3 (a)–(c) Multipole decomposition in ZnO nanoellipsoids as a function of direction: (a) r_{ x } = 200 nm, r_{ y } = r_{ z } = 50 nm, (b) r_{ y } = 200 nm, r_{ x } = r_{ z } = 50 nm, (c) r_{ z } = 200 nm, r_{ x } = r_{ y } = 50 nm. (d) XY and XZ scattering planes of the second harmonic for previous cases; blue, red, and green color define the long axis of the ellipsoid in the x, y and zdirection, respectively. All polar plots are normalized to the maximum forward scattering of the xoriented ellipsoid. (e) Second harmonic emitted in XY and XZ direction, averaged over the three orientations, and normalized to the maximum scattering in the forward direction. 

In the text 
Figure 4 Multipole decomposition, second harmonic farfield distribution and nonlinear dissymmetry factor as a function of number of turns of a nanohelix. The inset shows the helix geometry, with linear and nonlinear results for (a) N = 0.5, (b) N = 1, and (c) N = 1.5. Geometric parameters of each helix are p = 200 nm, d = 100 nm, and r = 50 nm. All polar plots are normalized to the maximum forward scattering for RCP excitation. 

In the text 
Figure 5 Multipole decomposition and second harmonic farfield distribution as a function of nanohelix loop radius; other geometric parameters of each helix are p = 200 nm, d = 100 nm, and N = 1, and multipole decomposition is done for (a) r = 20 nm, (b) r = 60 nm, and (c) r = 100 nm. (d) XY (left) and XZ (right) farfield distributions at 400 nm, for LCP and RCP excitations, and r = 20 nm (blue), r = 60 nm (green), and r = 100 nm (red). All polar plots are normalized to the maximum forward scattering for r = 100 nm and RCP excitation. (e) Electric field intensity at 400 nm in the xzplane, when r = 100 nm nanohelix is excited from the top, at 800 nm, with RCP (left) and LCP (right). 

In the text 
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (fulltext article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 4896 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.