EDP Sciences logo
Submit your research paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 21 / No 2 (2025) J. Eur. Opt. Society-Rapid Publ., 21 2 (2025) 45 References
Open Access
Issue
J. Eur. Opt. Society-Rapid Publ.
Volume 21, Number 2, 2025
Article Number 45
Number of page(s) 15
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/jeos/2025042
Published online 20 October 2025
  1. Park Y, Depeursinge C, Popescu G, Quantitative phase imaging in biomedicine, Nat. Photon. 12, 578–589 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-018-0253-x. [Google Scholar]
  2. Kleiber A, Kraus D, Henkel T, Fritzsche W, Review: tomographic imaging flow cytometry, Lab on a Chip 21, 3655–3666 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1039/d1lc00533b. [Google Scholar]
  3. Merola F, et al., Tomographic flow cytometry by digital holography, Light Sci. Appl. 6, e16241 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/lsa.2016.241. [Google Scholar]
  4. Balasubramani V, et al., Roadmap on digital holography-based quantitative phase imaging, J. Imaging 7, 252 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging7120252. [Google Scholar]
  5. Běhal J, et al., Developing a reliable holographic flow Cyto-Tomography apparatus by optimizing the experimental layout and computational processing, Cells 11, 2591 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11162591. [Google Scholar]
  6. Kujawińska M, Krauze W, Baczewska M, Kuś A, Ziemczonok M, Comparative study of laboratory and commercial limited-angle holographic tomography setups, Proc. SPIE 2, 7 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2511641. [Google Scholar]
  7. Kim K, Yoon J, Shin S, Lee S-Y, Yang S-A, Park Y, Optical diffraction tomography techniques for the study of cell pathophysiology, J. Biomed. Photonics Eng. 2, 020201 (2016). https://doi.org/10.18287/jbpe16.02.020201. [Google Scholar]
  8. Park C, Shin S, Park Y, Generalized quantification of three-dimensional resolution in optical diffraction tomography using the projection of maximal spatial bandwidths, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 35, 1891 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1364/josaa.35.001891. [Google Scholar]
  9. Lim J, Ayoub AB, Antoine EE, Psaltis D, High-fidelity optical diffraction tomography of multiple scattering samples, Light Sci. Appl. 8, 82 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-019-0195-1. [Google Scholar]
  10. Bertilson M, von Hofsten O, Hertz HM, Vogt U, Numerical model for tomographic image formation in transmission X-ray microscopy, Opt. Express 19, 11578 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.19.011578. [Google Scholar]
  11. Lim J, Ayoub AB, Psaltis D, Three-dimensional tomography of red blood cells using deep learning, Adv. Photonics 2, 026001 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.ap.2.2.026001. [Google Scholar]
  12. Ziemczonok M, Kuś A, Wasylczyk P, Kujawińska M, 3D-printed biological cell phantom for testing 3D quantitative phase imaging systems, Sci. Rep. 9, 18872 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-55330-4. [Google Scholar]
  13. Gonzalez-Hernandez D, et al., Single‐step 3D printing of micro‐optics with adjustable refractive index by ultrafast laser nanolithography, Adv. Opt. Mater. 11, 2300258 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.202300258. [Google Scholar]
  14. Krauze W, Kuś A, Ziemczonok M, Haimowitz M, Chowdhury S, Kujawińska M, 3D scattering microphantom sample to assess quantitative accuracy in tomographic phase microscopy techniques, Sci. Rep. 12, 19586 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-24193-7. [Google Scholar]
  15. Pirone D, et al., Stain-free identification of cell nuclei using tomographic phase microscopy in flow cytometry, Nat Photonics 16, 851–859 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-022-01096-7. [Google Scholar]
  16. Borrelli F, et al., Deep learning for accelerating Radon inversion in single-cells tomographic phase imaging flow cytometry, Opt. Lasers Eng. 172, 107873 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2023.107873. [Google Scholar]
  17. Bianco V, et al., Label‐free intracellular multi‐specificity in yeast cells by phase‐contrast tomographic flow cytometry, Small Methods 7, e2300447 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/smtd.202300447. [Google Scholar]
  18. Pirone D, et al., 3D imaging lipidometry in single cell by in-flow holographic tomography, Opto-Electron. Adv. 6, 220048 (2023). https://doi.org/10.29026/oea.2023.220048. [Google Scholar]
  19. Gul B, Ashraf S, Khan S, Nisar H, Ahmad I, Cell refractive index: Models, insights, applications and future perspectives, Photodiagn. Photodyn. Ther. 33, 102096 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2020.102096. [Google Scholar]
  20. Wilson JD, Cottrell W, Foster TH, Index-of-refraction-dependent subcellular light scattering observed with organelle-specific dyes, J. Biomed. Opt. 12, 014010 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.2437765. [Google Scholar]
  21. Ahmad I, Khaliq A, Iqbal M, Khan S, Mueller matrix polarimetry for characterization of skin tissue samples: A review, Photodiagn. Photodyn. Ther. 30, 101708 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2020.101708. [Google Scholar]
  22. Marques ARA, Saftig P, Lysosomal storage disorders – challenges, concepts and avenues for therapy: beyond rare diseases, J. Cell Sci. 132, jcs221739 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.221739. [Google Scholar]
  23. Singh A, Sood N, Narang V, Goyal A, Morphology of COVID-19–affected cells in peripheral blood film, BMJ Case Rep. 13, e236117 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2020-236117. [Google Scholar]
  24. Shubin AV, et al., Protease 3C of hepatitis A virus induces vacuolization of lysosomal/endosomal organelles and caspase-independent cell death, BMC Cell Biol. 16, 4 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12860-015-0050-z. [Google Scholar]
  25. Satria RD, et al., Increased TNF-α initiates cytoplasmic vacuolization in whole blood coculture with dengue virus, J. Immunol. Res. 2021, 6654617 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6654617. [Google Scholar]
  26. Monel B, et al., Zika virus induces massive cytoplasmic vacuolization and paraptosis‐like death in infected cells, EMBO J. 36, 1653–1668 (2017). https://doi.org/10.15252/embj.201695597. [Google Scholar]
  27. Ambrosio MR, et al., The alteration of lipid metabolism in Burkitt lymphoma identifies a novel marker: adipophilin, PLoS ONE 7, e44315 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0044315. [Google Scholar]
  28. Lynch DT, Foucar K, Discrete vacuoles in lymphocytes as a subtle clue to mantle cell lymphoma, Blood 127, 3292 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2016-03-706101. [Google Scholar]
  29. Ballo O, Stratmann J, Serve H, Steffen B, Finkelmeier F, Brandts C, Blast vacuolization in AML patients indicates adverse-risk AML and is associated with impaired survival after intensive induction chemotherapy, PLoS ONE 14:e0223013 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223013. [Google Scholar]
  30. Song J, et al., A higher percentage of leukemic blasts with vacuoles predicts unfavorable outcomes in patients with acute myeloid leukemia, Leuk. Res. 109, 106638 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leukres.2021.106638. [Google Scholar]
  31. Zhao Y, Wang E, Prominent cytoplasmic vacuolization in a leukemic phase of peripheral T-cell lymphoma, Am. J. Med. Sci. 362, e27–e28 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjms.2021.01.016. [Google Scholar]
  32. Murphy DJ, The dynamic roles of intracellular lipid droplets: from archaea to mammals, Protoplasma 249, 541–585 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-011-0329-7. [Google Scholar]
  33. Olzmann JA, Carvalho P, Dynamics and functions of lipid droplets, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 20, 137–155 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41580-018-0085-z. [Google Scholar]
  34. Tirinato L, et al., An Overview of Lipid Droplets in Cancer and Cancer Stem Cells, Stem Cells Int. 2017, 1656053 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1656053. [Google Scholar]
  35. Imai Y, Cousins RS, Liu S, Phelps BM, Promes JA, Connecting pancreatic islet lipid metabolism with insulin secretion and the development of type 2 diabetes, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1461, 53–72 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14037. [Google Scholar]
  36. Liu L, et al., Glial lipid droplets and ROS induced by mitochondrial defects promote neurodegeneration, Cell 160, 177–190 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.12.019. [Google Scholar]
  37. Monson EA, Trenerry AM, Laws JL, Mackenzie JM, Helbig KJ, Lipid droplets and lipid mediators in viral infection and immunity, FEMS Microbiol Rev 45 4, fuaa066 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1093/femsre/fuaa066. [Google Scholar]
  38. Dias SSG, et al., Lipid droplets fuel SARS-CoV-2 replication and production of inflammatory mediators, PLoS Pathog. 16, e1009127 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1009127. [Google Scholar]
  39. Wen Y, et al., Quantitative analysis and comparison of 3D morphology between viable and apoptotic MCF-7 breast cancer cells and characterization of nuclear fragmentation, PLoS ONE 12, e0184726 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184726. [Google Scholar]
  40. Haseda K, Kanematsu K, Noguchi K, Saito H, Umeda N, Ohta Y, Significant correlation between refractive index and activity of mitochondria: single mitochondrion study, Biomed. Opt. Express 6, 859 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1364/boe.6.000859. [Google Scholar]
  41. MathWorks, linspace (accessed December 2024). https://it.mathworks.com/help/matlab/ref/linspace.html. [Google Scholar]
  42. MathWorks, strel (accessed December 2024). https://it.mathworks.com/help/images/ref/strel.html. [Google Scholar]
  43. Thiemicke F, et al., Fast simulation of the influence of a refractive free-form microstructure on a wave field based on scalar diffraction theory, J. Eur, Opt. Soc. Rapid Publ. 21, 4 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41476-025-00285-8. [Google Scholar]
  44. MathWorks, iradon (accessed December 2024). https://it.mathworks.com/help/images/ref/iradon.html. [Google Scholar]
  45. Müller P, Schürmann M, Guck J, The Theory of Diffraction Tomography, arXiv (Cornell Univ.) (2015). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1507.00466. [Google Scholar]
  46. Kim MK, Principles and techniques of digital holographic microscopy, SPIE Rev. 1(1), 018005 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1117/6.0000006. [Google Scholar]
  47. Kim G, et al., Holotomography, Nat. Rev. Methods Primers 4, 51 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-024-00327-1. [Google Scholar]
  48. Shevkunov I, Ziemczonok M, Kujawińska M, Egiazarian K, Complex-domain SVD- and sparsity-based denoising for optical diffraction tomograph, Opt. Lasers Eng. 157, 107228 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2022.107228. [Google Scholar]
  49. MathWorks, radon (accessed December 2024). https://it.mathworks.com/help/images/ref/radon.html. [Google Scholar]
  50. MathWorks, imnoise (accessed December 2024). https://it.mathworks.com/help/images/ref/imnoise.html. [Google Scholar]
  51. Borrelli F, Behal J, Bianco V, Miccio L, Memmolo P, Ferraro P, Lightweight CNN for 3D refractive index retrieval in holotomographic imaging flow cytometry, Proc SPIE 13571, Optical Methods for Inspection, Characterization, and Imaging of Biomaterials VII 135712P (2025). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3066638. [Google Scholar]
  52. Álvarez-Castaño MI, et al., Holographic tomographic volumetric additive manufacturing, Nat. Commun. 16, 1551 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-56852-4. [Google Scholar]
  53. Nicolet B, Wechsler F, Madrid-Wolff J, Moser C, Jakob W, Inverse rendering for tomographic volumetric additive manufacturing, ACM Trans. Graph. 43, 228 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1145/3687924. [Google Scholar]
  54. Desissaire S, Ziemczonok M, Cantat-Moltrecht T, Kuś A, Godefroy G, Hervé L, Paviolo C, Krauze W, Allier C, Mandula O, Kujawińska M, Bio-inspired 3D-printed phantom: encoding cellular heterogeneity for characterization of quantitative phase imaging, Measurement 247, 116765 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2024.116765. [Google Scholar]
  55. Ziemczonok M, Desissaire S, Neri J, Kuś A, Hervé L, Fiche C, Godefroy G, Fackeure M, Sery D, Krauze W, Padmanabhan K, Paviolo, C, Kujawińska M, Tailored 3D microphantoms: an essential tool for quantitative phase tomography analysis of organoids, Biocybern. Biomed. Eng. 45, 247–257 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbe.2024.102803. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.