EDP Sciences logo
Submit your research paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 10 (2015) J. Eur. Opt. Soc.-Rapid Publ., 10 (2015) 15052 References
Open Access
Issue
J. Eur. Opt. Soc.-Rapid Publ.
Volume 10, 2015
Article Number 15052
Number of page(s) 7
DOI https://doi.org/10.2971/jeos.2015.15052
Published online 20 November 2015
  1. Z. Lee, K. Du, R. Arnone, S. Liew, and B. Penta, “Penetration of solar radiation in the upper ocean: a numerical model for oceanic and coastal waters,” J. Geophys. Res. 110, C002780 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  2. J. R. V. Zaneveld, J. C. Kitchen, and J. L. Mueller, “Vertical structure of productivity and its vertical integration as derived from remotely sensed observations,” Limnol. Oceanogr. 38, 1384–1393 (1993). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. G. C. Chang, and T. D. Dickey, “Coastal ocean optical influences on solar transmission and radiant heating rate,” J. Geophys. Res. 109, C001821 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  4. M. R. Lewis, M. Carr, G. Feldman, W. Esaias, and C. McMclain, “Influence of penetrating solar radiation on the heat budget of the equatorial Pacific Ocean,” Nature 347, 543–545 (1990). [Google Scholar]
  5. J. T. O. Kirk, “Solar heating of water bodies as influenced by their inherent optical properties,” J. Geophys. Res. 93, 10897–10908 (1988). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. H. G. Stefan, J. J. Cardoni, F. R. Schiebe, and C. M. Cooper, “Model of light penetration in a turbid lake,” Water Resour. Res. 19, 109–120 (1983). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. N. G. Jerlov, Marine Optics (Elsevier, New York, 1976). [Google Scholar]
  8. C.-C. Liu, K. L. Carder, R. L. Miller, and J. E. Ivey, “Fast and accurate model of underwater scalar irradiance,” Appl. Optics 41, 4962–4974 (2002). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Z. Lee, M. Darecki, K. L. Carder, C. O. Davis, D. Stramski, and W. J. Rhea, “Diffuse attenuation coefficient of downwelling irradiance: An evaluation of remote sensing methods,” J. Geophys. Res. 110, (2005). [Google Scholar]
  10. C. D. Mobley, Light and water: radiative transfer in natural waters (Elsevier, New York, 1994). [Google Scholar]
  11. J. T. O. Kirk, Light and Photosynthesis in Aquatic Ecosystems (Cambridge University Press, New York, 1994). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Z. Lee, A. Weidemann, J. Kindle, R. Arnone, K. L. Carder, and C. Davis, “Euphotic zone depth: its derivation and implication to ocean-color remote sensing,” J. Geophys. Res. 112, C003802 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  13. G. D. Baffico, “Optical properties and light penetration in a deep, naturally acidic, iron rich lake: Lago Caviahue (Patagonia, Argentina),” Limnologica 43, 475–481 (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. C. L. Gallegos, and T. E. Jordan, “Impact of the spring 2000 phytoplankton bloom in Chesapeake bay on optical properties and light penetration in the Rhode river, Maryland,” Estuaries 25, 508–518 (2002). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. A. Morel, and S. Maritorena, “Bio-optical properties of oceanic waters: a reappraisal,” J. Geophys. Res. 106, 1763–7180 (2001). [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  16. F. R. Pick, “The abundance and composition of freshwater picocyanobacteria in relation to light penetration,” Limnol. Oceanogr. 36, 1457–1462 (1991). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. A. Bricaud, A. Morel, and L. Prieur, “Absorption by dissolved organic matter of the sea (yellow substance) in the UV and visible domains,” Limnol. Oceanogr. 26, 45–53 (1981). [Google Scholar]
  18. S. B. Wozniak, D. Stramski, “Modeling the optical properties of mineral particles suspended in seawater and their influence on ocean reflectance and chlorophyll estimation from remote sensing algorithms,” Appl. Optics 43, 3489–3503 (2004). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. M. Babin, and D. Stramski, “Variations in the mass-specific absorption coefficient of mineral particles suspended in water,” Limnol. Oceanogr. 49, 756–767 (2004). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. D. Stramski, and J. Tegowski, “Effects of intermittent entrainment of air bubbles by breaking wind waves on ocean reflectance and underwater light field,” J. Geophys. Res. 106, C000461 (2001). [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  21. A. Stelmaszewski, T. Krol, and H. Toczek, “Light scattering in Baltic crude oil-seawater emulsion,” Oceanologia 51, 405–414 (2009). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. National Research Council, Oil in the sea III: inputs, fates, and effects (The National Academies Press, Washington D. C., 2003). [Google Scholar]
  23. M. Fingas, Oil spill science and technology (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2011). [Google Scholar]
  24. Y. Gong, X. Zhao, Z. Cai, S. E. O'Reilly, X. Hao, and D. Zhao, “A review of oil, dispersed oil and sediment interactions in the aquatic environment: Influence on the fate, transport and remediation of oil spills,” Mar. Pol. Bul. 79, 16–33 (2014). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. K. Rudz, M. Darecki, and H. Toczek, “Modelling the influence of oil content on optical properties of seawater in the Baltic Sea,” J. Eur. Opt. Soc.-Rapid. 8, 13063 (2013). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. W. Freda, and J. Piskozub, “Improved method of Fournier- Forand marine phase function parameterization,” Opt. Express 15, 12763–12768 (2007). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. C. D. Mobley, L. K. Sundman, and E. Boss, “Phase function effects on oceanic light fields,” Appl. Optics 41, 1035–1050 (2002). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. W. Freda, “Comparison of the spectral-angular properties of light scattered in the Baltic Sea and oil emulsions,” J. Eur. Opt. Soc.- Rapid. 9, 14017 (2014). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. O. Johansen, P. J. Brandvik, and U. Farooq, “Droplet breakup in subsea oil releases, Part 2: Predictions of droplet size distributions with and without injection of chemical dispersants,” Mar. Pollut. Bull. 73, 327–335 (2013). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Z. Li, K. Lee, T. King, H. Niu, M. C. Boufadel, A. D. Venosa, “Application of entropy analysis of in situ droplet-size spectra in evaluation of oil chemical dispersion efficacy,” Mar. Pollut. Bull. 62, 2129–2136 (2011). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. M. Jonasz, and G. R. Fournier, Light scattering by particles in water: theoretical and experimental foundations (Academic Press, San Diego, 2007). [Google Scholar]
  32. Z. Otremba, “Oil droplets as light absorbents in seawater,” Opt. Express 15, 8592–8597 (2007). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. G. A. L. Delvigne, and C. E. Sweeney, “Natural dispersion of oil,” Oil Chem. Pollut. 4, 281–310 (1988). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Z. Li, K. Lee, T. King, M. C. Boufadel, and A. D. Venosa, “Evaluating crude oil chemical dispersion efficacy in a flow-through wave tank under regular non-breaking wave and breaking wave conditions,” Mar. Pollut. Bull. 58, 735–744 (2009). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. C. F. Bohren, and D. R. Huffman, Absorption and scattering of light by small particles (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1983). [Google Scholar]
  36. V. Drozdowska, W. Freda, E. Baszanowska, K. Rudz, M. Darecki, J. R. Heldt, and H. Toczek, “Spectral properties of natural and oil polluted Baltic seawater - results of measurements and modelling,” Eur. Phys. J.- Spec. Top. 222, 2157–2170 (2013). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. W. Freda, “Spectral dependence of the correlation between the backscattering coefficient and the volume scattering function measured in the southern Baltic Sea,” Oceanologia 54, 355–367 (2012). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. T. J. Petzold, Volume scattering functions for selected ocean waters (Scripps Institute of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, 1972). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. W. Freda, and J. Piskozub, “Revisiting the role of oceanic phase function in remote sensing reflectance,” Oceanologia 54, 29–38 (2012). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.