EDP Sciences logo
Submit your research paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 6 (2011) J. Eur. Opt. Soc.-Rapid Publ., 6 (2011) 11008 References
Open Access
Issue
J. Eur. Opt. Soc.-Rapid Publ.
Volume 6, 2011
Article Number 11008
Number of page(s) 5
DOI https://doi.org/10.2971/jeos.2011.11008
Published online 22 March 2011
  1. V. M. Shalaev, “Optical negative-index metamaterials” Nat. Photonics 1, 41–48 (2007). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. E. Plum, V. A. Fedotov, P. Kuo, D. P. Tsai, and N. I. Zheludev, “Towards the lasing spaser: controlling metamaterial optical response with semiconductor quantum dots” Opt. Express 17, 8548–8551 (2009). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. S. Xiao, V. P. Drachev, A. V. Kildishev, X. Ni, U. K. Chettiar, H.-K. Yuan and V. M. Shalaev, “Loss-free and active optical negative-index metamaterials” Nature 466, 735 (2010). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. J. Valentine, S. Zhang, T. Zentgraf, E. Ulin-Avila, D. A. Genov, G. Bartal, and X. Zhang, “Three-dimensional optical metamaterial with a negative refractive index” Nature 455, 376–380 (2008). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. S. Zhang, W. Fan, N. C. Panoiu, K. J. Malloy, R. M. Osgood, and S. R. Brueck, “Optical negative-index bulk metamaterials consisting of 2D perforated metaldielectric stacks” Opt. Express 14, 6778–6787 (2006). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. G. Dolling, C. Enkrich, M. Wegener, C. M. Soukoulis, and S. Linden, “Low-loss negative-index metamaterial at telecommunication wavelengths” Opt. Lett. 31, 1800–1802 (2006). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. G. Dolling, M. Wegener, C. M. Soukoulis, and S. Linden, “Design-related losses of double-fishnet negative-index photonic metamaterials” Opt. Express 15, 11536–11541 (2007). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. S. Zhang, W. Fan, K. J. Malloy, S. R. J. Brueck, N. C. Panoiu, and R. M. Osgood, “Demonstration of metal-dielectric negative-index metamaterials with improved performance at optical frequencies” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 23, 434–438 (2006). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. P. Ding, E. J. Liang, Q. Zhou, L. Zhang, Y. X. Yuan, and Q. Z. Xue, “Influence of metal-layer thickness on the losses in fishnet meta-material” in Proceedings to the International Workshop on Meta-materials, 191–193 (IEEE, Nanjing, 2008). [Google Scholar]
  10. J. B. Pendry, A. J. Holden, D. J. Robbins, and W. J. Stewart, “Low frequency plasmons in thin wire structures” J. Phys.-Condens. Mat. 10 (22), 4785–4809 (1998). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. V. A. Podolskiy, A. K. Sarychev, and V. M. Shalaev, “Plasmon modes in metal nanowires and left-handed materials” J. Nonlinear Opt. Phys. 11, 65–74 (2002). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. S. Zhang, W. Fan, K. J. Malloy, S. R. Brueck, N. C. Panoiu, and R. M. Osgood, “Near-infrared double negative metamaterials” Opt. Express 13, 4922–4930 (2005). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. J. Zhou, T. Koschny, and C. M. Soukoulis, “An efficient way to reduce losses of left-handed metamaterials” Opt. Express 16, 11147–11152 (2008). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. D. R. Smith, S. Schultz, P. Markos, and C. M. Soukoulis, “Determination of effective permittivity and permeability of metamaterials from reflection and transmission coefficients” Phys. Rev. B 65, 195104 (2002). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. X. Chen, T. M. Grzegorczyk, B. I. Wu, J. Pacheco, and J. A. Kong, “Robust method to retrieve the constitutive effective parameters of metamaterials” Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter Phys. 70, 016608 (2004). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. A. Mary, S. G. Rodrigo, F. J. Garcia-Vidal, and L. Martin-Moreno, “Theory of Negative-Refractive-Index Response of Double-Fishnet Structures” Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 1114–1117 (2008). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.