Open Access
Issue
J. Eur. Opt. Soc.-Rapid Publ.
Volume 5, 2010
Article Number 10018s
Number of page(s) 5
DOI https://doi.org/10.2971/jeos.2010.10018s
Published online 27 April 2010
  1. T. Dickey, M. Lewis, and G. Chang, “Optical oceanography: Recent advances and future directions using global remote sensing and in situ observations” Rev. Geophys. 44, RG1001 (2006). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. T. Platt, N. Hoepffner, V. Stuart, and C. Brown, Why Ocean Colour? The Societal Benefits of Ocean Colour Technology (Report Number 7, International Ocean Colour Coordinating Group, Dartmouth, Canada, 2008). [Google Scholar]
  3. W. Petersen, H. Wehde, H. Krasemann, F. Colijn, and F. Schroeder, “FerryBox and MERIS Assessment of coastal and shelf sea ecosystems by combining in situ and remotely sensed data” Estuar. Coast Shelf S. 77, 296–307 (2008). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. I. S. Robinson, Remote sensing of shelf sea ecosystems (Position Paper 12, European Science Foundation, Ostend, Belgium, 2008). [Google Scholar]
  5. A. Morel, and L. Prieur, “Analysis of variations in ocean colour” Limnol. Oceanogr. 22, 709–722 (1977). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. J. T. O. Kirk, “The relationship between the inherent and the apparent optical properties of surface waters and its dependence on the shape of the volume scattering function” in Ocean Optics, R. W. Spinrad, K. L. Carder, M. J. Perry, eds., (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1994). [Google Scholar]
  7. C. D. Mobley, Light and Water: Radiative Transfer in Natural Waters (Academic Press, San Diego, 1994). [Google Scholar]
  8. C. D. Mobley, “Estimation of the remote-sensing reflectance from above-surface measurements” Appl. Opt. 38, 7442–7455 (1999). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. J. A. Richards, and X. Jia, Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis: An Introduction (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2005). [Google Scholar]
  10. H. Schiller, and R. Doerffer, “Neural network for emulation of an inverse model - operational derivation of case II water properties from MERIS data” Int. J. Remote Sens. 20, 17351746 (1999). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. T. S. Kostadinov, D. A. Siegel, S. Maritorena, and N. Guillocheau, “Ocean color observations and modeling for an optically complex site: Santa Barbara Channel, California, USA” J. Geophys. Res. 112, C07011 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  12. S. Maritorena, D. A. Siegel, and A. R. Peterson, “Optimization of a semianalytical ocean color model for global-scale applications” Appl. Opt. 41, 2705–2714 (2002). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. D. A. Siegel, S. Maritorena, N. B. Nelson, and M. J. Behrenfeld, “Independence and interdependencies among global ocean color properties : Reassessing the bio-optical assumption” J. Geophys. Res. 110, C07011 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  14. C. D. Mobley, L. K. Sundman, C. O. Davis, T. V. Downes, R. A. Leathers, M. J. Montes, J. H. Bowles, W. P. Bissett, D. D. R. Kohler, R. P. Reid, E. M. Louchard, and A. Gleason, “Interpretation of hyperspectral remote-sensing imagery via spectrum matching and look-up tables” Appl. Opt. 44, 3576–3592 (2005). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. M. P. Lesser, and C. D. Mobley, “Bathymetry, optical properties, and benthic classification of coral reefs using hyperspectral remote sensing imagery” Coral Reefs 26, 819829 (2007). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. M. Defoin-Platel, and M. Chami, “How ambiguous is the inverse problem of ocean color in coastal waters?” J. Geophys. Res. 112, C03004 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  17. M. Babin, D. Stramski, G. M. Ferrari, H. Claustre, A. Bricaud, G. Obolensky, and N. Hoepffner, “Variations in the light absorption coefficients of phytoplankton, nonalgal particles, and dissolved organic matter in coastal waters around Europe” J. Geophys. Res. 108, 3211 (2003). [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  18. D. McKee, and A. Cunningham, “Identification and characterisation of two optical water types in the Irish Sea from in situ inherent optical properties and seawater constituents” Estuar. Coast Shelf S. 68, 305–316 (2006). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. W. W. Gregg, N. W. Casey, J. E. O’Reilly, and W. E. Esias, “An empirical approach to ocean colour data: reducing bias and the need for post-launch radiometric re-calibration” Remote Sens. Environ. 113, 1598–1612 (2009). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.