Issue |
J. Eur. Opt. Soc.-Rapid Publ.
Volume 10, 2015
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 15056 | |
Number of page(s) | 6 | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.2971/jeos.2015.15056 | |
Published online | 03 December 2015 |
Regular paper
Accuracy of the subsurface damage parameters calculated by the finite difference algorithm
State Key Laboratory for Manufacturing Systems Engineering Mechanical Engineering School, Xi’an Jiaotong UniversityXi’an, Shaanxi, China 710049
Received:
29
September
2015
Revised:
23
October
2015
An important approach to characterize the full three-dimensional information of subsurface damage is to simulate the etching process of a sample reversely. The simulation starts from the morphology of the sample after the subsurface damage micro cracks being opened totally. During the etching experiment, it is possible for us to get the surface morphology at any moment. This paper presents a finite difference algorithm to simulate the morphology evolution during the etching process and then the surface’s morphology of the sample at a specific time can be obtained. Comparison between the simulated morphology and the measured one provides the clue of improving the precision of the finite difference algorithm. This method is kind of the fast calculation. In addition, the accuracy of this calculation of the corrosion model needs to be ensured. In order to improve the precision of calculation, the time interval should be set as the appropriate value by comparison and analysis. In this paper, the accuracy can be calculated through comparing the simulated result with the experimental result, and the maximum error of this method can be gained.
Key words: Subsurface damage / finite difference algorithm / simulation / accuracy
© The Author(s) 2015. All rights reserved.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.