Issue |
J. Eur. Opt. Soc.-Rapid Publ.
Volume 1, 2006
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 06020 | |
Number of page(s) | 8 | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.2971/jeos.2006.06020 | |
Published online | 02 November 2006 |
Regular papers
Comparison of beam combiners for a synthetic aperture imaging telescope
1
Delft University of Technology, Optics Research Group, Lorentzweg 1, NL-2628, CJ Delft, The Netherlands
2
SRON, Netherlands Institute for Space Research, Sorbonnelaan 2, NL-3584, CA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Received:
22
August
2006
Future astronomical space missions will comprise a constellation of several optical telescopes to detect exo-planets by interferometric nulling of starlight. The Darwin mission of the European Space Agency (ESA) and NASAs Terrestrial Planet Finder Interferometer both consist of a free-flying collection of telescopes and a beam combiner. As such, the constellation provides a co-phased array of telescopes that can also be used for aperture synthesis imaging. This imaging technique relies on recording intensity interference patterns, in which the layout of the beam combination optics and the detector play a key role. Several designs for beam combination have been proposed in the literature. In this article, we compare these beam combiners by rigorously simulating the imaging process of a weak stellar source, taking into account the photon arrival statistics, an imperfect detection process and the image reconstruction from the recorded data. The results are presented as the to be expected reconstruction error in the luminous intensity distribution function of a wide-field stellar source versus the provided amount of photons. Using these results, the optimum design of the combination beam combiner and detector array can be identified.
Key words: Coherence imaging / partial coherence in imaging / phased-array imaging systems / telescopes / astronomical optics / space optics
© The Author(s) 2006. All rights reserved.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.