Open Access
Issue
J. Eur. Opt. Society-Rapid Publ.
Volume 22, Number 1, 2026
Article Number 49
Number of page(s) 11
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/jeos/2026043
Published online 03 June 2026
  1. Alqudsi Y, Makaraci M, UAV swarms: research, challenges, and future directions, J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 72, 12 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s44147-025-00582-3 [Google Scholar]
  2. Stodola P, Nohel J, Horák L, Dynamic reconnaissance operations with UAV swarms: adapting to environmental changes, Sci. Rep. 15, 15092 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-00201-4 [Google Scholar]
  3. Fan Y, Optimized task allocation for unmanned aerial vehicle swarms in smart agriculture, in Advances in Guidance, Navigation and Control, Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, Vol. 1349 (Springer, Singapore, 2025), pp. 349–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-2248-1_34 [Google Scholar]
  4. Zhang X, Zhang J, Gao J, et al., A sharding blockchain-based UAV system for search and rescue missions, Front Comput. Sci. 19, 193805 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-024-3467-8 [Google Scholar]
  5. Lattimer BY, Huang X, Delichatsios MA, et al., Use of unmanned aerial systems in outdoor firefighting, Fire Technol, 59, 2961–2988 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-023-01437-0 [Google Scholar]
  6. Ding G, Ren Y, Liu Y, Zhao Q, Li S, Vision-based anti-unmanned aerial technology: opportunities and challenges, IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Mag. 13(4), 382–405 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1109/MGRS.2025.3589763 [Google Scholar]
  7. Liu Y, Sun Z, Xi L, et al., MMFW-UAV dataset: multi-sensor and multi-view fixed-wing UAV dataset for air-to-air vision tasks, Sci. Data 12, 185 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-025-04482-2 [Google Scholar]
  8. Xu L, Luo Z, Anti-UAV detection and identification technology: fundamentals, methods and challenges, Phys. Commun. 71, 102676 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phycom.2025.102676 [Google Scholar]
  9. Al-lQubaydhi N, Alenezi A, Alanazi T, et al., Deep learning for unmanned aerial vehicles detection: a review, Comput Sci. Rev. 51, 100614 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosrev.2023.100614 [Google Scholar]
  10. Wang B, Li Q, Mao Q, et al., A survey on vision-based anti unmanned aerial vehicles methods, Drones 8, 518 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/drones8090518 [Google Scholar]
  11. Dong Y, Wu F, Zhang S, et al., Securing the skies: a comprehensive survey on anti-UAV methods, benchmarking, and future directions, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW), Nashville, TN, USA (IEEE, New York, 2025), pp. 6661–6675. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPRW67362.2025.00663 [Google Scholar]
  12. Last M, Early detection of small- and medium-sized drones in complex environments, Drone Syst. Appl. 13, 1–10 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1139/dsa-2025-0018 [Google Scholar]
  13. Cheng Q, Li J, Du J, et al., Anti-UAV detection method based on local-global feature focusing module, in: Proceedings of the 7th IEEE Advanced Information Technology, Electronic and Automation Control Conference (IAEAC), Chongqing, China (IEEE, New York, 2024), pp. 1413–1418. https://doi.org/10.1109/IAEAC59436.2024.10503882 [Google Scholar]
  14. Jiang Y, Jingliang G, Yanqing Z, et al., Detection and tracking method of small-sized UAV based on YOLOv5, in: Proceedings of the 19th International Computer Conference on Wavelet Active Media Technology and Information Processing (ICCWAMTIP), Chengdu, China (IEEE, New York, 2022), pp. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCWAMTIP56608.2022.10016550 [Google Scholar]
  15. Zheng Y, Chen Z, Lv D, Li Z, Lan Z, Zhao S, Air-to-air visual detection of micro-UAVs: an experimental evaluation of deep learning, IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 6, 1020–1027 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2021.3056059 [Google Scholar]
  16. Zhao J, Zhang J, Li D, Wang D, Vision-based anti-UAV detection and tracking, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 23, 25323–25334 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2022.3177627 [Google Scholar]
  17. Shah S, Dey D, Lovett C, Kapoor A, AirSim: high-fidelity visual and physical simulation for autonomous vehicles, in Field and Service Robotics, Springer Proc. Adv. Robot. Vol. 5 (Springer, Cham, 2018), pp. 621–635. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67361-5_40 [Google Scholar]
  18. Qiu W, Yuille A, UnrealCV: connecting computer vision to Unreal Engine, in Computer Vision – ECCV 2016 Workshops, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 9915 (Springer, Cham, 2016), pp. 909–916. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49409-8_75 [Google Scholar]
  19. Nasir FA, Khurshid K, SyntAR: synthetic data generation using multiscale attention generator-discriminator framework (SinGAN-MSA) for improved aircraft recognition in remote sensing images, Multimed. Tools Appl. 84, 42777–42805 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-025-20825-y [Google Scholar]
  20. Patel R, Chandalia D, Nayak A, et al., CGI-based synthetic data generation and detection pipeline for small objects in aerial imagery, IEEE Access 13, 61192–61206 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3553530 [Google Scholar]
  21. Tobin J, Fong R, Ray A, Schneider J, Zaremba W, Abbeel P, Domain randomization for transferring deep neural networks from simulation to the real world, in Proc. IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Intell. Robots Syst. (IROS), Vancouver, Canada (IEEE, New York, 2017), pp. 23–30. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2017.8202133 [Google Scholar]
  22. Zhu JY, Park T, Isola P, Efros AA, Unpaired image-to-image translation using cycle-consistent adversarial networks, in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Comput. Vis. (ICCV), Venice, Italy (2017), pp. 2223–2232. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCV.2017.244 [Google Scholar]
  23. Ganin Y, Ustinova E, Ajakan H, et al., Domain-adversarial training of neural networks, J. Mach. Learn. Res. 17, 1–35 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58347-1_10 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.