EDP Sciences logo
Submit your research paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 22 / No 1 (2026) J. Eur. Opt. Society-Rapid Publ., 22 1 (2026) 46 References
Open Access
Issue
J. Eur. Opt. Society-Rapid Publ.
Volume 22, Number 1, 2026
Article Number 46
Number of page(s) 10
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/jeos/2026017
Published online 03 June 2026
  1. Zhang Z, Gao Y, Wang X, et al., Selective generation of laser transverse modes by gain regulation with a digital micromirror device. IEEE Phot. Technol. Lett. 34, 420–423 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/LPT.2022.3164417. [Google Scholar]
  2. Sheikh M, Riza NA, Demonstration of pinhole laser beam profiling using a digital micromirror device. IEEE Phot. Technol. Lett. 21, 666–668 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1109/LPT.2009.2016113. [Google Scholar]
  3. Soldevila F, Durán V, Clemente P, et al., Phase imaging by spatial wavefront sampling. Optica 5, 164 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1364/optica.5.000164. [Google Scholar]
  4. Loriot V, Mendoza-Yero O, Pérez-Vizcaíno J, et al., Fresnel phase retrieval method using an annular lens array on an SLM. Appl. Phys. B 117, 67–73 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00340-014-5799-9. [Google Scholar]
  5. Weiner AM, Femtosecond pulse shaping using spatial light modulators. Rev. Sci. Instr. 71, 1929–1960 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1150614. [Google Scholar]
  6. Mendoza-Yero O, Loriot V, Pérez-Vizcaíno J, et al., Programmable quasi-direct space-to-time pulse shaper with active wavefront correction. Opt. Lett. 37, (2012). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.37.005067. [Google Scholar]
  7. Köhler J, Wollenhaupt M, Bayer T, et al., Zeptosecond precision pulse shaping. J. Chem. Phys. 111, 10934–10956 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.19.011638. [Google Scholar]
  8. Salter PS, Booth MJ, Adaptive optics in laser processing. Light Sci. Appl. 8, 1–16 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-019-0215-1. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Torres-Peiró S, González-Ausejo J, Mendoza-Yero O, et al., Parallel laser micromachining based on diffractive optical elements with dispersion compensated femtosecond pulses. Opt. Express 21, 31830 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.21.031830. [Google Scholar]
  10. Tross J, Kolliopoulos G, Trallero-Herrero CA, Self referencing attosecond interferometer with zeptosecond precision. Opt. Express 27, 22960 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.27.022960. [Google Scholar]
  11. Mendoza-Yero O, Carbonell-Leal M, Doñate-Buendía C, et al., Diffractive control of 3D multifilamentation in fused silica with micrometric resolution. Opt. Express 24, 15307 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.24.015307. [Google Scholar]
  12. Villoresi P, Bonora S, Pascolini M, et al., Optimization of high-order harmonic generation by adaptive control of a sub-10-fs pulse wave front. Opt. Lett. 29, (2004). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.29.000207. [Google Scholar]
  13. Krenn M, Handsteiner J, Fink M, et al., Twisted light transmission over 143 km. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, 13648–13653 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1612023113. [Google Scholar]
  14. Zhuang Z, Ho HP, Application of digital micromirror devices (DMD) in biomedical instruments. J. Innov. Opt. Health Sci. 13 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793545820300116. [Google Scholar]
  15. Harrison J, Naidoo D, Forbes A, Dudley A, Progress in high-power and high-intensity structured light. Adv Phys X 9, (2024). https://doi.org/10.1080/23746149.2024.2327453. [Google Scholar]
  16. Yang Y, Forbes A, and Cao L, A review of liquid crystal spatial light modulators: devices and applications, Opt. Electr. Sci. 2, 8, (2023). https://doi.org/10.29026/oes.2023.230026. [Google Scholar]
  17. Toporovsky V, Samarkin V, Sheldakova J, et al., Water-cooled stacked-actuator flexible mirror for high-power laser beam correction. Opt. Laser Technol. 144 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2021.107427. [Google Scholar]
  18. Soloviev A, Kotov A, Martyanov M, et al., Improving focusability of post-compressed PW laser pulses using a deformable mirror. Opt. Express 30, 40584 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.471300. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Furieri T, Bassi A, Bonora S, Large field of view aberrations correction with deformable lenses and multi conjugate adaptive optics. J. Biophotonics 16, (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/jbio.202300104. [Google Scholar]
  20. Turtaev S, Leite IT, Mitchell KJ, et al., Comparison of nematic liquid-crystal and DMD based spatial light modulation in complex photonics. Opt. Express 25, 29874 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.25.029874. [Google Scholar]
  21. Geng Q, Wang D, Chen P, Chen SC, Ultrafast multi-focus 3-D nano-fabrication based on two-photon polymerization. Nat. Commun 10 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10249-2. [Google Scholar]
  22. Wang P, Liang J, Wang LV, Single-shot ultrafast imaging attaining 70 trillion frames per second. Nat. Commun. 11 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15745-4. [Google Scholar]
  23. Cheng J, Gu C, Zhang D, Chen SC, High-speed femtosecond laser beam shaping based on binary holography using a digital micromirror device. Opt. Lett. 40, 4875 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1364/ol.40.004875. [Google Scholar]
  24. Gu C, Chang Y, Zhang D, et al., Femtosecond laser pulse shaping at megahertz rate via a digital micromirror device. Opt. Lett. 40, 4018 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1364/ol.40.004018. [Google Scholar]
  25. Gu C, Zhang D, Chang Y, Chen S-C, Digital micromirror device-based ultrafast pulse shaping for femtosecond laser. Opt. Lett. 40, 2870 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1364/ol.40.002870. [Google Scholar]
  26. Gunnar RMK, Bernd E, Laser-induced damage threshold of camera sensors and microoptoelectromechanical systems. Opt. Eng. 56 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.OE.56.3.034108. [Google Scholar]
  27. Wellershoff SS, Hohlfeld J, Güdde J, Matthias E, The role of electron–phonon coupling in femtosecond laser damage of metals. Appl. Phys. A Mater. Sci. Proc. 69, S99–S107 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/s003399900305. [Google Scholar]
  28. Schwarz B, Ritt G, Eberle B, Impact of threshold assessment methods in laser-induced damage measurements using the examples of CCD, CMOS, and DMD. Appl. Opt. 60, F39 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.423791. [Google Scholar]
  29. Perrie W, Gill M, Robinson G, et al., Femtosecond laser micro-structuring of aluminium under helium. Appl. Surf. Sci. 230, 50–59 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2003.12.035. [Google Scholar]
  30. Bashir S, Rafique MS, Husinsky W, Identification of non-thermal and thermal processes in femtosecond laser-ablated aluminum. Radiat. Effects Def. Solids 168, 902–911 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/10420150.2013.784911. [Google Scholar]
  31. Van Kessel PF, Hornbeck LJ, Meier RE, and Douglass MR, A MEMS-based projection display, Proc. IEEE, 86, 8 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1109/5.704274. [Google Scholar]
  32. Texas Instruments. Digital micromirror device thermal considerations including pulsed optical sources: application note [Internet]. Dallas (TX): Texas Instruments; 2024 Jan. Technical report No. DLPA027B. Revised 2024 Apr [cited 2025 Nov 28]. Available from: https://www.ti.com/lit/an/dlpa027b/dlpa027b.pdf?ts=1764273477795. [Google Scholar]
  33. Stefan Nolte, in Ultrafast Lasers: Technology and Applications, edited by Fermann ME, Galvanauskas A, and Sucha G (Marcel Dekker, New York, 2003), pp. 376–379. [Google Scholar]
  34. Zhang J, Chen Y, Hu M, Chen X, An improved three-dimensional two-temperature model for multi-pulse femtosecond laser ablation of aluminum. J. Appl. Phys. 117, (2015). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4907990. [Google Scholar]
  35. Jm L, Simple technique for measurements of pulsed gaussian-beam spot sizes. Opt. Lett. 7, 196 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1364/ol.7.000196. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Texas Instruments. DLP7000 DLP® 0.7 XGA 2× LVDS Type A DMD: technical datasheet [Internet]. Dallas (TX): Texas Instruments; (2012) Aug. Technical report No. DLPS029B. Updated 2023 Apr. Cited 2025 Nov 28. Available from: https://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/dlp7000.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  37. Dudley D, Duncan WM, Slaughter JW Emerging Digital Micromirror Device (DMD) applications. Proc. SPIE. (2003). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.480761. [Google Scholar]
  38. Edmund Optics. Metallic mirror coatings: application note [Internet]. Barrington (NJ): Edmund Optics; n.d. [cited 2025 Nov 28]. Available from: https://www.edmundoptics.com/knowledge-center/application-notes/optics/metallic-mirror-coatings/. [Google Scholar]
  39. Newport Corporation. The Effect of Dispersion on Ultrashort Pulses: application note [Internet]. Newport (CA): Newport Corporation; n.d. [cited 2025 Nov 28]. Available from: https://www.newport.com/n/the-effect-of-dispersion-on-ultrashort-pulses. [Google Scholar]
  40. Sune S, Wolfgang Demtroder in Springer Handbook of Lasers and Optics, edited by Träger F, 2nd edn. (Springer, Berlin, 2012), pp. 1047–1056. [Google Scholar]
  41. Siegman AE, in Lasers, edited by University Science Books, 1st edn. (University Science Books, Mill Valley, 1986), p. 807. [Google Scholar]
  42. Mínguez-Vega G, Tajahuerce E, Fernández-Alonso M, Climent V, Lancis J, Caraquitena J, and Andrés P, Dispersion-compensated beam-splitting of femtosecond light pulses: wave optics analysis, Opt. Express 15, 278–288 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.15.000278 [Google Scholar]
  43. Martínez-Cuenca R, Martínez-León L, Lancis J, et al., High-visibility interference fringes with femtosecond laser radiation. Opt. Express 17, 23016 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.17.023016. [Google Scholar]
  44. Martínez-León L, Clemente P, Tajahuerce E, Mínguez-Vega G, Mendoza-Yero O, Fernández-Alonso M, Lancis J, Climent V, and Andrés P, Spatial-chirp compensation in dynamical holograms reconstructed with ultrafast lasers, Appl. Phys. Lett, 94, (2009). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3063047. [Google Scholar]
  45. Edgar MP, Gibson GM, and Padgett MJ, Principles and prospects for single-pixel imaging, Nat. Photonics. 13, 13–20 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-018-0300-7. [Google Scholar]
  46. Armin MJL, Single-pixel computational imaging: application to fluorescence and diffuse optical imaging, thesis, Universitat Jaume I (2024). https://doi.org/10.6035/14104.2024.716126. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.